Ebola patient in Texas has died

[Anonymous]

New suspected ebola case in Dallas being taken to the hospital by ambulance right now. Unnamed person supposedly had contact with Duncan.

On CNN right now.

[Anonymous]

Dallas police officer who entered Duncan's apartment without protective gear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So fleeing to the US did not work as a cure. It just infected others.

+1

Maybe that'll be a lesson for others trying this approach.

What others were infected?

The in your face people thinking they are so educated and progressive is disgusting. This man as sad as it did should never have entered the U.S. Ebola is serious and should not be treated like it's a common cold. That's how some of you are making this to be. And it's not about color.

So far Jesse Jackson seems like the only one who has made this about color, and I doubt he's on this thread. Because I, a progressive, think this man had no right to come here knowingly (and I admit that's just how I see it and it is not yet a proven fact) and infectiously.

Progressive Democrat, Dr. Louis Farrakhan Muhammad, Sr., has also made it about race. Specifically, that whites created Ebola as a bio-weapon to kill Africans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Your reading comprehension is poor. Please try to follow along with this thread, particularly the PP who challenged your logic when she wrote: "And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite."

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

Your reading comprehension is poor. Please try to follow along with this thread, particularly the PP who challenged your logic when she wrote: "And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dallas police officer who entered Duncan's apartment without protective gear.

The dead guy has committed assault on a police officer and his family are accomplices. You can be charged with murder if you are an accomplice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

Your reading comprehension is poor. Please try to follow along with this thread, particularly the PP who challenged your logic when she wrote: "And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite."

That PP didn't challenge my logic, because he/she wasn't responding to me.

My reading comprehension is fine. Your logic is circular.

He knew he was exposed.

How do you know he knew?

I know because he lied on his form.

How do you know he lied on his form?

Because they say he wasn't exposed, and he knew he was?

How do you know he knew?

I know because he lied on his form.

See? It makes no sense. It's quite possible that he knew and lied. It's also possible that there's evidence that proves that he knew he was exposed. However, the fact that he wrote down that he wasn't exposed is not proof that he knew he was exposed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:possible new case in TX: http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/health/2014/10/08/patient-frisco-ebola-suspect/16922477/

This is no bueno. If you are the guy to deliver a quarantine order to the potential ebola case, wouldn't protective gear be a sensible consideration? :/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

I do not know what this guy did wrong.

Now can we please stop maligning a dead man?

What a bunch of bullsh*t

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Progressive Democrat, Dr. Louis Farrakhan Muhammad, Sr., has also made it about race. Specifically, that whites created Ebola as a bio-weapon to kill Africans.

Hahahaha! Thanks, I needed that laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope people remember what this man did that resulted in his infection. He is dead today because he helped try to obtain medical care for a dying pregnant woman who was turned away from the hospital. He may or may not have known she had Ebola, but either way it was a pretty noble thing to do. What a tragedy.

Absolutely. He sounds like he was a good guy. Sad he has died.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:possible new case in TX: http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/health/2014/10/08/patient-frisco-ebola-suspect/16922477/

This is no bueno. If you are the guy to deliver a quarantine order to the potential ebola case, wouldn't protective gear be a sensible consideration? :/

But... they tell us Ebola is hard to get...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

I do not know what this guy did wrong.

Now can we please stop maligning a dead man?

+1. I am sick and tired of listening to a bunch of self-righteous, egotistical, self-absorbed, black-hearted, whiny excuse for human beings malign this man with innuendo and no solid facts of his intention.

There is no doubt in my mind that if you visited Italy or Sweden and was possibly exposed to something, you would climb over your own children to get back into this country. Everyone of you would lie your asses off. You know it and I know it.

Enough of the holier-than-thou bullshit.