Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I love this thread, I find it super funny.
Why do people treat MD parents who send kids to DC school different than VA, when most of VA suburbs, think Arlington and Alexadria are closer to the schools than CC, Bethesda, Mont Co? I don't get why Md aren't consider carpetbaggers or climbers or whatever the word of the hour is?
And how many people who live in NW are actually from DC? And when that person who lived in NW, say Georgetown, move to CC for more space what happens to their classification? I would much rather cross a bridge then go outside the Beltway, but that is just me!
You still don't get it.
It's because people who live in VA are choosing to live in a basically conservative state, and are choosing the land of broad lawns and narrow minds over the urban experience of living in DC. It has nothing to do with proximity. It's all about mindset.
I think you are the one with a problematic mindset. You seem to think that Virginians who send their kids to DC for school are "social climbers." What? I do not rely on my children's schools for social advancement. That is insane. Frankly, I loathe "society." And I say that as someone who is a card-carrying descendent of high society whose mother was disappointed that she chose not to make her debut at the St. Cecilia. Yes, in fact - we do exist in Virginia. Some of us even laugh at the ones on the thread calling themselves "old money." Honey, that is nothing to us. We are qualified for the DAR, honoring our ancestors who were officers in the Continental Army. Sure, they also owned plantations and slaves, but no one is perfect. We lost all that to the carpet baggers (and shame on whoever appropriated that term to describe Southerners. Honestly, please keep your history straight). But we never lost our dedication to ensuring our children got the best education available.
I don't pretend to speak for all of the other posters, but I, personally, do not think that VAs who send their kids to DC for school are social climbers. That's not the correct term. I think that they are materialistic, self-absorbed people who basically want it both ways... the elite education, along with the suburban lifestyle. They want the "best" of the city but are not willing to really invest themselves in an urban lifestyle because, god forbid, they might miss something on that giant screen TV. Or not have a place to park their SUV. Or have to live too close to their neighbors, and actually have to speak to them in the morning, rather than tune out on their I-phone.