PP you quoted here. I would never ask my child’s doctor their religious beliefs, just like I would never share my religious beliefs in a professional context. But NIH says that you are wrong. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27071796/ |
This study, cited in pubmed, is from February 2017 - almost 9 years ago. You can bet that more doctors are non-believers now and that more doctors are willing to acknowledge their lack of belief in God. |
This is the most accurate answer. But it’s not formless. It’s just not human form. |
No meeting in their afterlife. You can memorialize your lost pregnancies in your life. You get one. Please, please do not throw away your life in hopes of getting a better one later. Make the best of the one you have. |
Here's what AI has to say about God belief among scientists: Key findings from surveys: General Scientists (2009 Pew Survey): 51%: believed in a god or higher power. 33%: believed in God. 18%: believed in a universal spirit or higher power. 41%: did not believe in a god or higher power. Elite Scientists (1998 Larson and Whitham Survey): Only 7% of scientists in the National Academy of Sciences believed in a personal God. Many scientists in elite groups identify as agnostic or non-believers. Reasons for variations: Different Definitions: Surveys may use varying definitions of "God," with some scientists believing in a higher power but not a personal God. Sample Size and Type: Studies focusing on elite or nationally recognized scientists often show lower rates of religious belief compared to broader surveys of the general scientific community. Time of Study: Beliefs can shift over time, and older studies might not reflect current views. In summary, while more than half of scientists surveyed by Pew in 2009 expressed belief in a higher power, this figure is significantly lower among elite scientists, highlighting the difference between general scientific populations and those in highly respected scientific organizations. |
In Islamic faith, parents will be reunited with their miscarried children in the afterlife; a stillborn or miscarried child will wait at the gates of Paradise for its parents, eventually pulling them in. Allah will ensure its parents' entry into Paradise and reunion with the child if they exhibited patience in their grief.
I don't know if it means literal reunion in paradise or used as a metaphor for emotional attainment of peace which feels like being in a paradise with your loved ones. |
That's really sad. |
Not really. Doctors see it all, not just the “miracles” but the tragedies too. At some point, when you see enough, you conclude that either God doesn’t exist, or if God does exist, he’s not worth the bother. |
No, it's not nearly as bad as it looks at first glance. In some parts of the country, especially 10+ years ago, there was cultural pressure to say you were religious. The 50% figure was likely a gross exaggeration back in 2014, and will certainly be far smaller today given that the major of non-elderly people are are openly nonreligious. Don't worry, your doctors probably aren't in any cults. |
And your doctors should be up on all the latest science, which is what you want in a doctor |
The majority of non-elderly people may not be religious, but most of them are not talking openly about it. They tend to be respectful of religious people IRL, which is more than you can say about the way religious people treat people who are openly non-believing. e.g., it's OK to speculate about what happens to unborn babies from a religious point of view, but is considered rude to say that they just die like everyone else. |
It depends on the context, but it is basically like telling an 8 year old there's no Santa. At that age they probably know better, but are trying to delude themselves. |
No it is not "sad" Science is a thing idiot |
+1 |
There are no unborn babies.
Even if there were Republicans want them dead. Anyone bringing a child into the US now is insane and a horrible human. |