
I didn't ask for government intervention, come on now. I think the problem was best shown in the movie Idiocracy, where humanity becomes significantly less intelligent over generations because intelligent people choose to have fewer children, while those with lower intelligence have more. |
Why do “we” need to reverse this trend? It sounds a lot like natural selection. |
All of these intelliget, attractive, successful women married to men who match them are possibly doing that, you do have a point. |
Honey, when the National Socialist German Workers Party started, they were not part of the government. It is always shocking to me how often people believe that they are blessed members of an elite group based on their intelligence, genetics, attractiveness, etc. Reread your post about how 20% of the population should reproduce while 80% of the population should not, and then come back and tell us you do not believe in a master race. Perhaps it will make more sense to you if you go to your closet and retrieve your Brownshirt, so you can wear it while you do so. |
The 80% of men still get people to swipe on them they just get less swipes. So this “loneliness” epidemic is actually false.
It’s not that the “lonely man” can’t get dates. It’s just that they’re too lazy and too cheap to plan a good date and then. |
Obviously, all kinds of people get married all the time. Just go to the mall or the beach or a school event and look around. But it seems that many of the 80% don't consider their counterparts worth the effort. |
That’s literally not what that says. Did you miss “reading is fundamental” as a kid? |
Lol. Top 20% based on what qualifications? |
Anyone too stupid to meet people in real life doesn’t deserve to procreate anyway. |
Until men can grow children inside of them, a loser man and a loser women are not equals. A woman can claim she brings her body to grow and birth children to the table. What does a loser man bring? It takes 5 minutes to release sperm. And the 20% of men can provide sperm for all women. The same cannot be said of 20% of women having children for all men. So men have to try harder to be counterparts to "undesirable" women. |
It's crazy how true this is. Every liberal or sanely politically moderate guy (ie, Romney Republican) I know has a wife and kids. Straight white guys I know who dislike Trump? Mostly married men with daughters, living in suburbs adjacent to major urban cities. The guys who constantly complain about the dating market? Almost all of them are conservatives in finance or somehow were "red pilled" in recent years. Some former Democrats who hated Hillary and Kamala. It's uncanny. |
Yvery few womena, knowingly get into a relationship with a misogynist, so this makes sense. |
There are many, many men like you describe. And I know you want that to be everyone. But online the sheer numbers are made up of Asian and Indian men. |
I never understood why single men insist on using a medium that overly benefits women. OLD is mainly built for women. I never tried OLD. I got rejected left and right and at times looked desperate, but I eventually found a woman that I would have probably never found had I gone online.
Ironically she was single and swiping for men on OLD. At the time she said I was the first man to approach her in a non creepy way in person. Men just need to try their luck in person. I'll go as far as saying that if a man can't find a woman on OLD and he is not willing to try in person, he is actually better of just single. He will be doing himself a favor. |
This seems to be the real issue. |