Trump illegally deports 2-year-old US citizen

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It’s not rocket science. Mom wanted and took her baby with her. The end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

They aren’t the ones that started a thread with a misleading title so right back at you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats object to use of term 'anchor babies' and also insist that babies serve as an anchor keeping illegal immigrants from being deported.

This. That's what's really going on here. The dummies whining that a mom and baby weren't separated are actually mad that the child's status didn't allow the mom to stay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

I didn't know it was a Democrat who wrote the unanimous 4th circuit ruling in the Garcia case. Last I checked, it was an ultraconservative Federalist Society justice You might want to read that and get back to us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

I didn't know it was a Democrat who wrote the unanimous 4th circuit ruling in the Garcia case. Last I checked, it was an ultraconservative Federalist Society justice You might want to read that and get back to us.

SCOTUS has overturned the 4th circuit before, as recently as April for this same guy. You act as if it’s over just because the circuit court made an opinion. It’s not over until the high court rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The child wasn’t deported. A US citizen cannot be deported. The illegal alien mother was deported and chose to bring her child back to her country with her. She put in writing that she wished to have the child return with her to her country.

Against the fathers wishes and with no due process. See the problem?

The problem is coming here illegally and having kids.

DP. You may not like it, but the US still has birthright citizenship under the constitution. The Supreme Court is expected to take up the matter, and it may rule against birthright citizenship but, for now, it’s still allowed by our constitution.

Birthright citizenship is one of several factors that make this mass deportation agenda so messy.

I'm convinced a large majority American people would support an agenda that prioritizes securing the border completely, reforming immigration/asylum laws and then focusing solely on the deportation of criminals and proven gang members who don't have legal status to be here.

No. Everyone illegal should be sent out. Criminal or not. This whole American only want criminals deported and wants all other illegals to stay is made up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

So what is your theory for why the Trump- appointed, Trump-supporting judge in this case raised concern and scheduled a hearing in May to revisit the matter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

So what is your theory for why the Trump- appointed, Trump-supporting judge in this case raised concern and scheduled a hearing in May to revisit the matter?

Judges
Aren’t
Infallible

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

I didn't know it was a Democrat who wrote the unanimous 4th circuit ruling in the Garcia case. Last I checked, it was an ultraconservative Federalist Society justice You might want to read that and get back to us.

SCOTUS has overturned the 4th circuit before, as recently as April for this same guy. You act as if it’s over just because the circuit court made an opinion. It’s not over until the high court rules.

It’s over because the government didn’t appeal the fourth circuit decision to SCOTUS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It's easy to see. Whatever Trump does is declared insufficient process by Democrats and contrary to law.

So what is your theory for why the Trump- appointed, Trump-supporting judge in this case raised concern and scheduled a hearing in May to revisit the matter?

Judges
Aren’t
Infallible

But you are? Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how MAGA are all immigration law experts now!

It’s not rocket science. Mom wanted and took her baby with her. The end.

This is very likely what happened. I am a Dem -always have been- but I support immigration policies and actions that enforce existing law. It’s hard to watch but some of this is necessary.

A lot of people don’t know what they are talking about. They live in ivory towers where they don’t see the impacts of some of the last ten to fifteen years. They pick and chose what victims to protect. Some of this is being done for the parent constituents and women who like walking around our own cities without being blocked and diverted by encampments. I am a Dem but I want my Dem leaders to protect me too (and calm down the market). thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The crux of this story is that this particular deportation--like so many others we have already read about--appeared to be rushed and did not follow a "meaningful process" (judge's words). The judge--by all accounts a pro-Trump judge who has come through for Trump in the past--was concerned enough about the lack of a "meaningful process" that he scheduled a hearing for May 16 to follow up on this matter. Sounds like another "oopsie it's too late" removal.

The child can come back since she is a citizen. Why do you all keep repeating lies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The crux of this story is that this particular deportation--like so many others we have already read about--appeared to be rushed and did not follow a "meaningful process" (judge's words). The judge--by all accounts a pro-Trump judge who has come through for Trump in the past--was concerned enough about the lack of a "meaningful process" that he scheduled a hearing for May 16 to follow up on this matter. Sounds like another "oopsie it's too late" removal.

The child can come back since she is a citizen. Why do you all keep repeating lies?

I'm the pp you're responding to. Where's the lie? I just summarized the story that the PP linked. The judge was concerned and scheduled a hearing due to what the judge perceived as a lack of a "meaningful process." Where's the lie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The crux of this story is that this particular deportation--like so many others we have already read about--appeared to be rushed and did not follow a "meaningful process" (judge's words). The judge--by all accounts a pro-Trump judge who has come through for Trump in the past--was concerned enough about the lack of a "meaningful process" that he scheduled a hearing for May 16 to follow up on this matter. Sounds like another "oopsie it's too late" removal.

The child can come back since she is a citizen. Why do you all keep repeating lies?

I'm the pp you're responding to. Where's the lie? I just summarized the story that the PP linked. The judge was concerned and scheduled a hearing due to what the judge perceived as a lack of a "meaningful process." Where's the lie?

The lie is where you said "Sounds like another "oopsie it's too late" removal." The child went with her mother as the mother requested. She is a US citizen and can return to the US the same as any other citizen if her mother allows it. The mother can arrange for a US citizen guardian to escort her and put her on a plane back to the US today if she wanted to. Why wait until the hearing in May?