Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Geez will you stop already? Such a droning broken record. You said your point. Endlessly. |
Nope. It is what is in the curriculum being discussed here. Adding this in kindergarten. It is not part of existing FLE for kindergarten. I have a kindergartner. I know what they learned in FLE this year and I am happy if FCPS adds basic acknowledgement of kids with gay parents to the basic FLE teaching moving forward. Maybe read what is actually being proposed before just reacting? |
No it is not. |
Did you miss the part where they discuss families and all their different configurations - in kindergarten? The two moms/dads discussion is covered. You really need to relax. That's not what we're talking about here at all. |
It’s their school system, you just pay for it and entrust your children to it. Don’t you dare speak up…or your draw the ire of the “frankly” poster. |
+1 And I have to laugh at the moron who keeps shrieking "astroturf!" Karl Frisch and his minions across the country know allll about astroturfing. |
Wow. I give up.
|
She is a Christian influencer who works with the Family Foyndation. She doesn't even know that the Fairfsx School Board has 12 members (she says it is 16). This is an operation to distract us from the OPSEC violations with Signal. |
"his proposal has children in kindergarten learning about “two parent/guardian families” including “mother and father, two mothers, two fathers, and children.” The draft also states for first grade: “Discussion will include ways people are different including race, cultures and traditions, religions, and dis/ability. Dignity will be defined, and the definition of respect will be reviewed. Ways to treat others with dignity and respect will be presented.” The draft states that for fifth grade: “The terms sex assigned at birth and gender identity will be defined. Identity will include the idea that for some people their sex assigned at birth and gender identity are the same and for some people their sex assigned at birth and gender identity are different.” The draft further states: “Students will define pronouns and recognize why some people may use pronouns that differ from their sex assigned at birth or are gender neutral.”" |
DP - so what are you talking about? Because the beginning of the thread was definitely about kindergarten. And then a bunch of people shouted that down and it's devolved to saying "that's not what we're talking about." |
This what is proposed. Zero objections. |
Fifth grade is absolutely the wring age to introduce that. ALL of the kids at that age are feeling uncomfortable and self conscious with their bodies. The only reason to intriduce it in fifth is to put the idea in their head while they are still impressionable kids but also while they are naturally going through body discomfort and self consciousness. The only thing they should be told is that feeling awkward and not liking your body changes is natural, normal, and will pass in a year or two. |
+1000000!!!!!! |
This is ALREADY in the kindergarten curriculum. Good grief! It's clearly you who needs to read, so let me help you: Kindergarten Instructional Objectives – Emotional and Social Health K.1 Students will recognize that everyone is a member of a family and identify members of their individual families. Descriptive Statement: Students will identify adult and child members of their families. The type of family structures could include any adult caregivers of the child and any children that live in the home with the child. This could include but are not limited to two parent/guardian families (mother/father, two mothers, two fathers, extended family members, or grandparents), single parent/guardian families, adoptive families, foster families, families with stepparents, and blended families. https://www.fcps.edu/academics/elementary/kindergarten/year-at-a-glance/family-life-education |
As noted earlier, she may have been referring to the number of members on the family life advisory committee, not the school board. You sound like you're trafficking in conspiracy theories when you say it's intended to "distract us from the OPSEC violations with Signal." Not that many people really care what happens within FCPS. |