+1. The only person you're hurting is your small business person carrier. Hope you feel good about that. |
They haven’t been viewed as independent for a very, very long time. |
Most people have online subscriptions. |
Correct. And the LA Times can fabricate other excuses, too, but no one is fooled. |
Yeah, but the thumb is now clearly on the scale. It’s clear he’s directly manipulating things, and that can’t help but bleed into the reporting. Reporters and editors will self-censor. Stories will be softened or killed outright. There are obviously many many people who support Trump. Now they have another outlet for their “news”. |
| Our carrier keeps throwing the paper under the car. We were thinking of digital only anyway. |
|
If the reporters had any integrity, they’d resign.
If they stay, they’ve made their choice, too. |
Most don't earn enough to quit without another job lined up. I can't fault them. |
When I feel that the majority of news articles are compromised, I will cancel. I’ve done that with other media. |
I feel like the only person who would say that is someone who wants to destroy decent journalism on this country. Why don’t all the journalists quit, simc all the papers are basically owned by a$$holes? That would show them! I agree with PP that’s it’s probably more meaningful to cut your Amazon subscription if you are able. (I know we are all a little dependent now.). Bezos doesn’t make money from WaPo—it’s a vanity project, and people cutting subscriptions won’t bother him at all. He’ll just do another round of layoffs. In some ways, this is the best result. If WaPo endorsed Harris, everyone would shrug and it would change zero minds. By bezps overplaying his hand, this is getting a lot of attention—the editorial board is starngkng strong and looks good, and everyone is reminded what is at stake—namely, the risk of electing a president that demands loyalty and punishes those who criticize him, with a billionaire class that does his bidding. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, America. |
You're right, Amazon is not a newspaper. As you may have heard, Jeff Bezos owns both Amazon and the Washington Post. |
I can only assume you’re being willfully obtuse. Of course newspapers are owned by rich egomaniacs. Most businesses are. He is directly interfering with the newspaper’s content. He overriding editorial decisions. It’s out in the open. The Post had a great, historic run, but it’s done. Those who stay will be complicit. |
|
You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.
You are children if you don't see this. |
lolololol |
Same PP. Next, for consistency, I finally created an account on a post-X website, and tried to find there all the handles I followed on X. To close out my Saturday, instead of placing a grocery order on Amazon Fresh, I did a huge Trader Joe's run. |