Democracy Dies in Darkness

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the reporters had any integrity, they’d resign.

If they stay, they’ve made their choice, too.

Most don't earn enough to quit without another job lined up. I can't fault them.

The very, very many that I know all come from extreme wealth or they married a high earner. Like, literally every journalist I know (legit- career-WSJ, NG, NYT...) they all live in 2M+ houses. Their kids attend big OOS universities/colleges schools, predictable NE places or typical southern privates. It's expensive, like 80K a year.

These people are not starving.

[Anonymous]

This. Screw amazon/Whole Foods. Any way you can. Choose any alternative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

Says a guy who flags weery single mention of Emhoff's bastards or Kamala's affairs with married folk.

Huh?

You didn't answer the question

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

I must have missed the Post publishing them.

In hindsight, that makes sense.

Can’t bite the hand.

[Anonymous]

And now I’m remembering that the Post sat on the Alito flag story for 3 years.

Huh.

Wonder why that was?

[Anonymous]

It seems like little Jeff Bezos was scared of getting his tits caught in a wringer.

[Anonymous]

Dodgers will win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

Says a guy who flags weery single mention of Emhoff's bastards or Kamala's affairs with married folk.

Huh?

You didn't answer the question

I did. You just didn't like the answer or couldn't understand my response.

How do you feel about having a man who denies his offspring while at the same time standing on a stage talking about family?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

Says a guy who flags weery single mention of Emhoff's bastards or Kamala's affairs with married folk.

Huh?

You didn't answer the question

I did. You just didn't like the answer or couldn't understand my response.

How do you feel about having a man who denies his offspring while at the same time standing on a stage talking about family?

Is that man running for president? How far should we take this game of random whataboutism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

Says a guy who flags weery single mention of Emhoff's bastards or Kamala's affairs with married folk.

Huh?

You didn't answer the question

I did. You just didn't like the answer or couldn't understand my response.

How do you feel about having a man who denies his offspring while at the same time standing on a stage talking about family?

Is that man running for president? How far should we take this game of random whataboutism?

No, Elon Musk is not running for president. He is just funding the campaign.

(The PP was probably not talking about Elon Musk, though.)

[Anonymous]

This thread is so funny. I cancelled my WaPo subscription years ago because it had become a left-wing echo chamber.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

Says a guy who flags weery single mention of Emhoff's bastards or Kamala's affairs with married folk.

Huh?

You didn't answer the question

I did. You just didn't like the answer or couldn't understand my response.

How do you feel about having a man who denies his offspring while at the same time standing on a stage talking about family?

Is that man running for president? How far should we take this game of random whataboutism?

No, Elon Musk is not running for president. He is just funding the campaign.

(The PP was probably not talking about Elon Musk, though.)

Apparently they are mad about whoever it is as they brought it up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You should all be more concerned about the constant suppresion of speech here than one editorial at Bezos' hobby.

You are children if you don't see this.

So are you mad about Musk suppressing the hacked Trump campaign materials on X? Suddenly the party that was all about wikileaks isn't?

Says a guy who flags weery single mention of Emhoff's bastards or Kamala's affairs with married folk.

Huh?

You didn't answer the question

I did. You just didn't like the answer or couldn't understand my response.

How do you feel about having a man who denies his offspring while at the same time standing on a stage talking about family?

I feel that I don't trust people who engage in conspiracy BS but it is clear you go down some rabbit holes to that end.

Meanwhile one of the people running has actually been convicted of rape and paid hush money to cover up his affair with a stripper and boasted about his daughter's boobs and sex appeal. This is all excusable of course, if one is a cult follower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the reporters had any integrity, they’d resign.

If they stay, they’ve made their choice, too.

Most don't earn enough to quit without another job lined up. I can't fault them.

The very, very many that I know all come from extreme wealth or they married a high earner. Like, literally every journalist I know (legit- career-WSJ, NG, NYT...) they all live in 2M+ houses. Their kids attend big OOS universities/colleges schools, predictable NE places or typical southern privates. It's expensive, like 80K a year.

These people are not starving.

Don't let your social circle blind you to the reality that most journalists are NOT wealthy enough to quit. I despise people like you who have no clue how 99% of America lives.