
It's equally appropriate as talking about the risks of oral sex with a child that has never heard of it or expressed any interest in it. How about you just stop talking about oral sex with children for no reason? |
No, dear. But no one should be having oral sex (least of all teens) without knowing all the facts. That is my point. The poster above kept saying there is little to no risk with oral sex which is wildly untrue. |
For no reason, maybe. But there was a reason. A sex ed class at school didn't cover it when they should have since it carries as much risk as intercourse. Do you get it now? |
Please. People have been having sex and will continue to have sex without reading whatever recent garbage studies. |
You are an idiot. People have been spreading STDs, sure. But now we know better so we do better. Why do you think we vaccinate our kids for HPV? |
They didn't cover it for a reason. But mommies here believe they will be managing their daughtes' sex lives. |
What is the reason they would cover intercourse, but not oral? Please do tell. |
So much for a fun thread
Moo 🐮 |
It’s not wildly untrue, not as long as you get Larla the HPV vax. Sorry to burst your sex-negative bubble. |
boy howdy, SOMEONE needs to bone up on their sex ed! |
Another DCUM moron. |
Yes, and that someone is you. |
Probably because the main thrust is pregnancy prevention |
Well, knock me over with a feather. I thought it would be health! |
because unlike you they are not titillated by discussing oral sex with children? |