What Does FCPS Do with Excess Capacity at Herndon HS

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was there ANY discussion of the new western HS during the School Board meeting last night? Or are they just sticking it in the CIP like their predecessors did and thinking we won't notice that nothing ever happens?


They’ve expanded 4 Western HSs (Centerville, HHS, SLHS and Centerville) since the mythical W. county Hs entered the CIP. It’s never gonna happen. To start with, they sold the only site that made sense (the Carson adjacent land) to Saudis Arabia and now there is a great new private school there. The Hutchinson site makes no sense given where capacity relief is needed and the traffic issues it would cause. But, they have no Plan B as far as I can tell.

Once they sold the Carson site, any hope of a new Hs was over. And with the demographic cliff and expansion of the 4 HSs, it isn’t really needed. The capacity issues can be dealt with my boundary adjustment. It’s just that the SB is too afraid do make them happen. And I believe they will slow walk boundary adjustments here until after the next SB election rather than growing a pair and making it happen.


I wasn't asking about whether the western HS should or will get built. As far as I can tell, it's DOA now for the reasons you mention.

I was asking whether the School Board discussed it since it's again very prominently featured in the CIP. They seem to want to convey the message that they are going to do business differently than their predecessors. A good start would be to have a CIP that reflects reality, and not what's been a false promise for over a decade.



Without having listened to the meeting, I can tell you with 98% certainty they did not discuss it. Money for the W County Hs has already been in a bond that passed. The school has been promisedto the community for at least 15 year— since my 22 year old was in 2nd or 3rd grade. We live very near Carson and I assumed when my kids were in ES that the HS would go to the Carson site and my kids (or at least my then pre-K kid) would attend the new HS (a decade or more in the future). That kid graduates from not the new HS this year.

Also, the Hutchinson site sucks and no one wants the HS there, and the BOS sold the site that would work.

No one on the SB has the spine to stand up after all that and say “nevermind, no new school,”— especially when some schools (certainly Chantilly, but not only Chantilly) are so overcrowded and they have released no plan for W County capacity relief. Plus, announcing they are killing the new HS put a lot more pressure on them. I’ve spent more than a decade hearing “we know there is overcrowding and boundary adjustments are needed, but it makes the most sense to wait for the new HS and do all the boundary changes at one. We know you don’t want your kids Hs changed now, then changed again in a few years when the new HS is build”. Complete BS, but it’s how the SB (and BIS) has avoided dealing with what will be a nasty boundary adjustment— especially if Langley and HHS are involved.

They will kill the W Co HS only if they ever do boundary adjustments (and I have my doubts that they ever will— promising relief with a new HS that in reality will never happen has worked for them for years).

And if they raise the W Co HS, they need to explain why they sold the site, put it in a bind anyway and have promised for well over a decade while making no progress on making the Hs happen (except the bond. But bonding is easy and they will just divert that money elsewhere.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't they take it out of the CIP?


Of course. It should have come out when they sold the Carson site and it became apparent to everyone who had waited for a decade for the new HS to materialize that it was never going to happen. Instead, they doubled down and put it in a bond a couple years ago and said they had chosen the Hutchinson site (under the prior, COVID era SB, most of whose members no one could accuse of being smart, competent, or honest with the community about challenging realities). But no one who understands Western County zoning (which I grant you isn’t a lot of people— the boundaries are a disaster) or who has watched the expansions at all the western county HSs actually believes it will happen.

But, pulling it out of the CIP without a solution for some HSs sitting at 110% capacity— or more (Chantilly)— while expanding HSs that are not over capacity (or not nearly as over capacity) is not a good look. And once they admit it’s not going to be built, they will be locked into readjusting boundaries— now— rather than following the time honored FCPS tradition of pushing messes like a western county Hs with no viable site and western county rezoning down the road for the SB to deal with. Langley and Chantilly parents and the parents of any kids moved to HHs or possibly SLHS (we don’t want IB!) are going to end up furious about any rezoning. Easier to overpromise and never deliver. Eventually, there will be a new SB and it’s no longer the current SB’s problem. Plus, the new SB can ask for “grace” (my least favorite word when spoken by anyone associated with FCPS) and time because they inherited a mess. Then they drag their feet a couple years and the cycle repeats. I’ve even watching this happen for well over a decade.



They need to hire an outside consultant and make a commitment to following their recommendations unless there is a very good, non-SES, non-DEI, non-parently pressure to avoid ELL and FARMS reason not to. Because yes, they need to aim to spread out FARMS and ELL more fairly among the schools— as long as they can do so without creating ridiculous commutes and moving kids who are a mile or two from one HS to another Hs 10 miles away in the make of equity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Was there ANY discussion of the new western HS during the School Board meeting last night? Or are they just sticking it in the CIP like their predecessors did and thinking we won't notice that nothing ever happens?


They’ve expanded 4 Western HSs (Centerville, HHS, SLHS and Centerville) since the mythical W. county Hs entered the CIP. It’s never gonna happen. To start with, they sold the only site that made sense (the Carson adjacent land) to Saudis Arabia and now there is a great new private school there. The Hutchinson site makes no sense given where capacity relief is needed and the traffic issues it would cause. But, they have no Plan B as far as I can tell.

Once they sold the Carson site, any hope of a new Hs was over. And with the demographic cliff and expansion of the 4 HSs, it isn’t really needed. The capacity issues can be dealt with my boundary adjustment. It’s just that the SB is too afraid do make them happen. And I believe they will slow walk boundary adjustments here until after the next SB election rather than growing a pair and making it happen.


I wasn't asking about whether the western HS should or will get built. As far as I can tell, it's DOA now for the reasons you mention.

I was asking whether the School Board discussed it since it's again very prominently featured in the CIP. They seem to want to convey the message that they are going to do business differently than their predecessors. A good start would be to have a CIP that reflects reality, and not what's been a false promise for over a decade.



I didn't catch any mention of the Western HS during the snippets I listened to as they discussed boundaries, but the overarching idea is that facilities, student-to-teacher ratio, academic program offerings, overcrowding, cost of bus routes, and even teacher salary are all coming to a head and it all boils down to boundary policy that can address the issues.

All that to say, I think the implication is that land acquisition for a Western HS will be decided after having a sensible boundary plan first.


And what land would they be acquiring? The BOS gave the only site that makes any sense and doesn’t create more problems than it solves to the Saudis. There is no appropriate site to be acquired, in a location where it makes things better rather than worse, and with practical things like decent ingress and egress. That’s a big part of the reason a W Co HS won’t happen— it requires a significant parcel of land that doesn’t back up traffic for miles every morning and afternoon and send kids who now live 3 miles for their high school a 45 minute bus ride away.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


First, it’s not a zero-sum game if we spend scarce capital resources expanding schools but don’t use that space because it might offend some entitled Langley mom. It’s a net negative.

Second, if Forestville kids moved back to Langley, it would increase the demand for advanced courses that Herndon is otherwise fully capable of offering. There’s nothing racist in acknowledging this. But I guess you’re fine with a situation where scheduling conflicts are more likely to be an issue at Herndon than at other schools.


DS at HMS, and even I think your Forestville efforts are pretty racist.


This is hilarious. No one on either side wants the equity crusader meddling in their schools. Go back to worrying about your own kids’ education, rather than social engineering.


Efficient use of facilities and reducing transportation costs is not social engineering.


As long as the trains run on time, right? Where have I heard that before?


Yes, moving some kids who live closer to Herndon to that school now that there's space would be just like putting them on a train to Auschwitz, right?


+1 Equating decent management of resources like HS seats so you don’t have a school at 120% capacity three miles from a school at 80% capacity with the Holocaust is just gross. Especially given current world events. No, moving your kid to HHS is not the same as your kid being help hostage in underground tunnels for months. Get over yourself.

I don’t really care if most of the kids they more out of Chantilly are UMC rather than FARMs and Chantilly’s ELL FARMS percentages rises some. My kids don’t melt is Poor sits at their lunchroom table. I do care that my kid, who is athlete at practice at 5pm has to have lunch at 10:30 am. And I do care that half their classes are in trailers. Especially in the age of school shootings.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


GTFOH. There’s no one more racist than the Langley parents always itching to scream “You wouldn’t send your kids to Herndon so why should we?”


DP. What about that is not true? Would you send your kids to Herndon? Nope. So don’t expect others to do so just because you “feel” they should. Also - what school do your kids attend?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


GTFOH. There’s no one more racist than the Langley parents always itching to scream “You wouldn’t send your kids to Herndon so why should we?”


Quite literally, I don’t understand your argument. The least logic statement on this thread, and man, that is saying something.


+1
Just so bizarre.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


GTFOH. There’s no one more racist than the Langley parents always itching to scream “You wouldn’t send your kids to Herndon so why should we?”


Quite literally, I don’t understand your argument. The least logic statement on this thread, and man, that is saying something.


There’s a nasty Langley parent constantly demanding that other posters identify their kids’ schools.

The only reason she does it is because she wants to claim they wouldn’t move their kid from School X to Herndon, so why should any part of Langley have to move (or move back) to Herndon.

Other areas may get redistricted, but the Langley poster not only expects, but demands, special treatment. She doesn’t even live in the part of Great Falls that might stand to be moved back to Herndon, but she’s always looking for an excuse to tell others their opinions don’t matter.


DP. You really are a piece of work. There are several posters here who have asked - and are still waiting - for those who are obsessed about Langley/Herndon to please identify which schools their kids go to. It absolutely matters. I would never opine on where the kids at any school other than my own should go. It’s the height of arrogance to insist that YOU know best for OTHER people’s kids. So yes - your opinions about other people’s kids and schools are irrelevant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


GTFOH. There’s no one more racist than the Langley parents always itching to scream “You wouldn’t send your kids to Herndon so why should we?”


Quite literally, I don’t understand your argument. The least logic statement on this thread, and man, that is saying something.


There’s a nasty Langley parent constantly demanding that other posters identify their kids’ schools.

The only reason she does it is because she wants to claim they wouldn’t move their kid from School X to Herndon, so why should any part of Langley have to move (or move back) to Herndon.

Other areas may get redistricted, but the Langley poster not only expects, but demands, special treatment. She doesn’t even live in the part of Great Falls that might stand to be moved back to Herndon, but she’s always looking for an excuse to tell others their opinions don’t matter.


Sure. It’s the Langley parent that is nasty, not you and your vitriolic rants.


+1000
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shouldn't they take it out of the CIP?


Of course. It should have come out when they sold the Carson site and it became apparent to everyone who had waited for a decade for the new HS to materialize that it was never going to happen. Instead, they doubled down and put it in a bond a couple years ago and said they had chosen the Hutchinson site (under the prior, COVID era SB, most of whose members no one could accuse of being smart, competent, or honest with the community about challenging realities). But no one who understands Western County zoning (which I grant you isn’t a lot of people— the boundaries are a disaster) or who has watched the expansions at all the western county HSs actually believes it will happen.

But, pulling it out of the CIP without a solution for some HSs sitting at 110% capacity— or more (Chantilly)— while expanding HSs that are not over capacity (or not nearly as over capacity) is not a good look. And once they admit it’s not going to be built, they will be locked into readjusting boundaries— now— rather than following the time honored FCPS tradition of pushing messes like a western county Hs with no viable site and western county rezoning down the road for the SB to deal with. Langley and Chantilly parents and the parents of any kids moved to HHs or possibly SLHS (we don’t want IB!) are going to end up furious about any rezoning. Easier to overpromise and never deliver. Eventually, there will be a new SB and it’s no longer the current SB’s problem. Plus, the new SB can ask for “grace” (my least favorite word when spoken by anyone associated with FCPS) and time because they inherited a mess. Then they drag their feet a couple years and the cycle repeats. I’ve even watching this happen for well over a decade.



They need to hire an outside consultant and make a commitment to following their recommendations unless there is a very good, non-SES, non-DEI, non-parently pressure to avoid ELL and FARMS reason not to. Because yes, they need to aim to spread out FARMS and ELL more fairly among the schools— as long as they can do so without creating ridiculous commutes and moving kids who are a mile or two from one HS to another Hs 10 miles away in the make of equity.


That already happened. Here are their recommendations:

1. Prioritize factors determining boundary policy.
2. Define school and program capacity to ensure consistency across the division.
3. Establish boundary adjustments based on balancing the number of schools and students
for efficient use of buildings.
4. Centralize, regionalize, or duplicate programs with great demand in schools across the
district to ensure equitable access for all families.
5. Limit time students are on busses and create efficient transportation networks.
6. Create an established and well-articulated exemption process.
7. Formally evaluate school boundary policies every five years.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/C9L3KG073D39/%24file/MGT%2520Boundary%2520Policy%2520Best%2520Practices%2520Review%2520Report.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwj8lP2o5p6EAxXLGlkFHUIvBsAQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw31CVtV1-GCn7fLz7PDaGJC
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


First, it’s not a zero-sum game if we spend scarce capital resources expanding schools but don’t use that space because it might offend some entitled Langley mom. It’s a net negative.

Second, if Forestville kids moved back to Langley, it would increase the demand for advanced courses that Herndon is otherwise fully capable of offering. There’s nothing racist in acknowledging this. But I guess you’re fine with a situation where scheduling conflicts are more likely to be an issue at Herndon than at other schools.


DP. What are you even talking about? Doesn’t Herndon offer all the same advanced classes of any other FCPS school? What “scheduling conflicts” are Herndon students experiencing?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


GTFOH. There’s no one more racist than the Langley parents always itching to scream “You wouldn’t send your kids to Herndon so why should we?”


DP. What about that is not true? Would you send your kids to Herndon? Nope. So don’t expect others to do so just because you “feel” they should. Also - what school do your kids attend?


Hilarious. A decent discussion is taking place with some Chantilly and other parents, and now the hideous Langley poster is back. Does her insecurity know no bounds?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


First, it’s not a zero-sum game if we spend scarce capital resources expanding schools but don’t use that space because it might offend some entitled Langley mom. It’s a net negative.

Second, if Forestville kids moved back to Langley, it would increase the demand for advanced courses that Herndon is otherwise fully capable of offering. There’s nothing racist in acknowledging this. But I guess you’re fine with a situation where scheduling conflicts are more likely to be an issue at Herndon than at other schools.


DP. What are you even talking about? Doesn’t Herndon offer all the same advanced classes of any other FCPS school? What “scheduling conflicts” are Herndon students experiencing?


Scheduling conflicts are more likely to occur when one school offers one session of an advanced class and another offers multiple sessions at different times of the day. Are you really that dense?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


First, it’s not a zero-sum game if we spend scarce capital resources expanding schools but don’t use that space because it might offend some entitled Langley mom. It’s a net negative.

Second, if Forestville kids moved back to Langley, it would increase the demand for advanced courses that Herndon is otherwise fully capable of offering. There’s nothing racist in acknowledging this. But I guess you’re fine with a situation where scheduling conflicts are more likely to be an issue at Herndon than at other schools.


DS at HMS, and even I think your Forestville efforts are pretty racist.


This is hilarious. No one on either side wants the equity crusader meddling in their schools. Go back to worrying about your own kids’ education, rather than social engineering.


+1. This just eviscerated the original poster. So embarrassing for her.


It's hilarious that someone thinks attacking someone as a "social engineer" or "equity warrior" eviscerates them.

It's how the GOP attacked all the successful Democratic candidates for school board last year (on their way to losing every seat).

I guess you can take refuge here, while the adults figure out how best to manage a $3B system fairly and efficiently.



You, sir or madam, are not part of the “adults” making any decisions for this school system. And with every post, you’re looking more and more absurd.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


GTFOH. There’s no one more racist than the Langley parents always itching to scream “You wouldn’t send your kids to Herndon so why should we?”


DP. What about that is not true? Would you send your kids to Herndon? Nope. So don’t expect others to do so just because you “feel” they should. Also - what school do your kids attend?


Hilarious. A decent discussion is taking place with some Chantilly and other parents, and now the hideous Langley poster is back. Does her insecurity know no bounds?


What? I’m responding to the above unhinged PP - probably you - who invokes “Langley parents” in every.single.post. But sure, pretend this is just a nice friendly conversation about Chantilly. Hilarious, indeed. You need help.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No offense but it’s not the schools that are good, it’s the kids. If you redistrict Langley kids to another school, the other school will increase by that amount. Schools are such a tiny part of academic achievement (meaning they all teach roughly the same). It’s mostly parents.


Bingo. Thats exactly why considering how to efficiently use available space and minimize transportation costs where possible likely makes sense.


Nah, I don’t but your zero-sum game utopia, and I’m not interested in theory-testing with my kids being your lab rats. Also, it’s a little racist/classist for you to claim that Forestville students would make Herndon High better.


First, it’s not a zero-sum game if we spend scarce capital resources expanding schools but don’t use that space because it might offend some entitled Langley mom. It’s a net negative.

Second, if Forestville kids moved back to Langley, it would increase the demand for advanced courses that Herndon is otherwise fully capable of offering. There’s nothing racist in acknowledging this. But I guess you’re fine with a situation where scheduling conflicts are more likely to be an issue at Herndon than at other schools.


DP. What are you even talking about? Doesn’t Herndon offer all the same advanced classes of any other FCPS school? What “scheduling conflicts” are Herndon students experiencing?


Scheduling conflicts are more likely to occur when one school offers one session of an advanced class and another offers multiple sessions at different times of the day. Are you really that dense?


Speaking of dense - you didn’t even answer the question. What are the SPECIFIC “scheduling conflicts” at HHS? Do tell!
Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Go to: