Senator Tuberville self id’s as white nationalist and wants white nationalists in military

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, I haven't read this whole thread - but are there really some people here asking what's wrong with white nationalism?

Yes.

Huh. If you had to guess, how many people are there on this forum making that argument?

Probably one to two Republicans but they spam every thread that excites them so it looks like more.

Regardless, the GOP is openly white supremacist now and the MoDeRaTe VoTeRs (Republicans) are fine with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, I haven't read this whole thread - but are there really some people here asking what's wrong with white nationalism?

Yes.

Huh. If you had to guess, how many people are there on this forum making that argument?

Nobody is making that argument.
Nobody.
The liberals here are attempting to attribute meaning to Tuberville's comments that are not true.
People are simply explaining to the liberals what he said and what he meant because, you know, comprehension is sometimes difficult for some people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, I haven't read this whole thread - but are there really some people here asking what's wrong with white nationalism?

Yes.

Huh. If you had to guess, how many people are there on this forum making that argument?

Nobody is making that argument.
Nobody.
The liberals here are attempting to attribute meaning to Tuberville's comments that are not true.
People are simply explaining to the liberals what he said and what he meant because, you know, comprehension is sometimes difficult for some people.

Are you saying Tuberville is too stupid to know the meaning of “white nationalism”??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:38% of AL residents are people of color. He does realize that he represents the entire state.

Let's not forget that this guy is dumb. Not the brightest bulb.

What is 3/5 of 38%...that is what he thinks he is representing in terms of people of color.

Oh, very, very true, Mr. History Referencer!
Well played, sir.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, I haven't read this whole thread - but are there really some people here asking what's wrong with white nationalism?

Yes.

Huh. If you had to guess, how many people are there on this forum making that argument?

Nobody is making that argument.
Nobody.
The liberals here are attempting to attribute meaning to Tuberville's comments that are not true.
People are simply explaining to the liberals what he said and what he meant because, you know, comprehension is sometimes difficult for some people.

Are you saying Tuberville is too stupid to know the meaning of “white nationalism”??

Oh, he well knows the meaning of that.
He also knows that liberals are prone to label anyone who disagrees with them as "racists," "White Supremacists," and "Nazis."
And, it is evidenced here on this thread and on a variety of other threads on this very site.

[Anonymous]

He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

Take some more English grammar courses, Yuri. You haven't perfected it yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

Take some more English grammar courses, Yuri. You haven't perfected it yet.

I am Chinese.

Please answer the question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

You are equating the bolded with White Nationalists?

Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

This isn't a serious post, is it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait, I haven't read this whole thread - but are there really some people here asking what's wrong with white nationalism?

Yes.

Huh. If you had to guess, how many people are there on this forum making that argument?

Nobody is making that argument.
Nobody.
The liberals here are attempting to attribute meaning to Tuberville's comments that are not true.
People are simply explaining to the liberals what he said and what he meant because, you know, comprehension is sometimes difficult for some people.

Are you saying Tuberville is too stupid to know the meaning of “white nationalism”??

Oh, he well knows the meaning of that.
He also knows that liberals are prone to label anyone who disagrees with them as "racists," "White Supremacists," and "Nazis."
And, it is evidenced here on this thread and on a variety of other threads on this very site.

This is false, no matter how many times you come here to repeat it. The only people being labeled as racists, white supremacists (or white nationalists) or Nazi's are the people, who by their very words, espouse and embrace the world view.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

You are equating the bolded with White Nationalists?

Really?

Each is an advocacy group.

Why is it ok for them to advocate? Why is it bad for white people to advocate?

Either everyone can advocate, or no one can advocate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

Last time I checked none of those groups were, to choose just one example, chanting to soak the ground in the blood of anyone. So if the bar for “bad guys” is set by the behavior of white nationalists, then no, those groups are not bad guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He still hasn’t said white nationalists are bad guys and shouldn’t be in the US military.

Is the ADL bad guys?
Is CAIR bad guys?
Is UnidosUS bad guys?
Is NAACP bad guys?

Can they're members join US military?

What does their advocacy take from other people?

You are equating the bolded with White Nationalists?

Really?

Each is an advocacy group.

Why is it ok for them to advocate? Why is it bad for white people to advocate?

Either everyone can advocate, or no one can advocate.

Because White Nationalists are not just "advocating" - maybe do a little research, hon.