Lindsey Graham to introduce federal abortion ban

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New Jersey, Vermont, Portland. No restrictions. Shall I go on?

You’re a particularly bad troll. Something not being illegal doesn’t mean something is unrestricted or taking place— why? Because a doctor still has to carry out the procedure. A doctor who has a medical license and a Hippocrates oath. Please find me the data of “convenience” abortions taking place in these states, and to define my terms I mean elective abortions past viability with no maternal or fetal health concern, lack of access, or rape.

I’ll wait.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm male and shocked to read so many posts implying women carry an unwanted pregnancy to third trimester before getting an elective abortion. Where is this folklore even coming from? I've never witnessed a woman's obvious late pregnancy end except in birth or tragedy.

Also, my wife had to have her pregnancy terminated at 18 weeks for health issues. What happened during those last 3 weeks of gestation that would make it illegal if Republicans have their way?

It’s been a standard forced birther lie for years. The point is that they hate women and want them to be punished; what better way to punish women than to take the worst experience of their life - a wanted pregnancy that’s not going to make it - and make it more dangerous, more fraught and just all around worse?

[Anonymous]

This is a nation BAN. 15 weeks would shorten the length for most Blue states and the ban would not supersede the states with total bans. so it's really a ban on any state that doesn't have draconian laws on the books. My daughter was on the fence about whether or not to apply to Clemson, this has sealed the deal with a big fat no. Red state ain't getting our money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s brilliant. It is the point at which most people agree. Prolife won’t agree to anything but I am a Republican woman from a long line of republican women (from the north, all college educated) and I want abortion legal but not unfettered. This will force democrats to own that some of them want unlimited abortion. By 15 weeks you know — that is 3 plus months in— so this means that after 15 weeks it’s off limits. But after that, the baby should have the chance. But this is about flushing out the liars and extremists in the pro abortion lobby. 12 is too soon, 20 is too late. 15 is the sweet spot and it’s going to have an impact.

Abortion has never been "unfettered" in the US. Never. Not even for a day.

People seek out abortions after 20 weeks because of fetal anomalies, because of danger to the mother's health. These are tragedies. And Americans are smart enough to know that. There is no pandemic of women 20+ weeks pregnant, or even 15+ weeks pregnant, deciding willy-nilly to end their pregnancy.

The vast majority of abortions happen in the first trimester.

You'd like to force women to go through 40 weeks of carrying a fetus that is going to die upon birth. Or force a woman to carry a doomed fetus until it is about to kill her, rather than letting her terminate at a much safer point for herself and her future fertility. And Americans who care about women aren't any having any of it.

YOU are the extremist here.

It is unfettered in Colorado. Completely legal for any reason until birth. Do your homework

26 weeks for any reason. Up to 34 weeks for things like genetic disorder.

DO YOUR HOMEWORK BETTER.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New Jersey, Vermont, Portland. No restrictions. Shall I go on?

If there are no legal restrictions on abortion in these states then I am sure there must be many examples of doctors performing late term abortions for convenience in these states, right?

No? Maybe because saying them at something doesn’t have legal restrictions doesn’t translate into unfettered access

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:New Jersey, Vermont, Portland. No restrictions. Shall I go on?

Yes, go on and name for us the actual clinics and doctors in those states that perform non-medically necessary abortions after the point of viability. Hell, tell us the ones that perform any abortions after the 2nd trimester, for any reason, even in the case of a mother's health. Go on. Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Regarding late term abortions, this is not gaslighting at all - it's the mainstream position of the Democrats to protect such a right. They even passed it in the House: Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA). Go read it, as long as the pregnancy is determined as a risk to the mother's health - a standard which is not defined in the act and is therefore wide open - abortion can be performed at any time.

Please cite a single example of a late term (ie third trimester) abortion that was elective with no mitigating circumstances.

Hint, you can't, it is a red herring established by the Evangelicals as a strawman talking point.

The reality is that when a pregnancy gets to a third term, the mother is thinking about names, prepping a nursury etc, No one carries a fetus to 6 months and then decides, eh, screw it, I didn't want the kid.

????


Then why do you fight so hard for third trimester abortion????

Because of all the fetal abnormalities and other risks that become evident.

This isn't hard. Google it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Regarding late term abortions, this is not gaslighting at all - it's the mainstream position of the Democrats to protect such a right. They even passed it in the House: Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA). Go read it, as long as the pregnancy is determined as a risk to the mother's health - a standard which is not defined in the act and is therefore wide open - abortion can be performed at any time.

Please cite a single example of a late term (ie third trimester) abortion that was elective with no mitigating circumstances.

Hint, you can't, it is a red herring established by the Evangelicals as a strawman talking point.

The reality is that when a pregnancy gets to a third term, the mother is thinking about names, prepping a nursury etc, No one carries a fetus to 6 months and then decides, eh, screw it, I didn't want the kid.

These misogynists are getting dumber by the day, I swear.


????


Then why do you fight so hard for third trimester abortion????

Because of all the fetal abnormalities and other risks that become evident.

This isn't hard. Google it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Jersey, Vermont, Portland. No restrictions. Shall I go on?

Yes, go on and name for us the actual clinics and doctors in those states that perform non-medically necessary abortions after the point of viability. Hell, tell us the ones that perform any abortions after the 2nd trimester, for any reason, even in the case of a mother's health. Go on. Please.

There are only two doctors in the US who do this since a forced birther murdered the third one.

[Anonymous]

This is just disgusting.

See, you anti-aboritonists. This is what we mean when we say you don't give a damn about a child after it's born. You cry for the pain you believe a 15 week old fetus feels but you could care less about the pain of a newborn bleeding from every single orifice of its body.

Horrific.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s brilliant. It is the point at which most people agree. Prolife won’t agree to anything but I am a Republican woman from a long line of republican women (from the north, all college educated) and I want abortion legal but not unfettered. This will force democrats to own that some of them want unlimited abortion. By 15 weeks you know — that is 3 plus months in— so this means that after 15 weeks it’s off limits. But after that, the baby should have the chance. But this is about flushing out the liars and extremists in the pro abortion lobby. 12 is too soon, 20 is too late. 15 is the sweet spot and it’s going to have an impact.

It's brilliant because it lets ignorant people think they're being reasonable while still unreasonably restricting health care for women. 15 weeks is completely arbitrary, except that the people who picked it know it puts the deadline before the full body scan at 20 weeks, which will prevent women from choosing abortions when they get bad news about the health of the fetus at that checkup. It's quite heartless for republicans to choose a random cut off date that has no basis in science, medicine or religion, only in control and cruelty. I really don't understand why someone would say it's acceptable to allow abortions of nonviable fetuses up to 15 weeks, but it's absolutely unacceptable and should be illegal to abort an unviable fetus with medical problems 5 weeks later. No good will come of laws like this.

Even worse, it allows terminations of viable, healthy fetuses being carried by healthy women at 15 weeks but not by unviable fetuses at 20 weeks. I thought Republicans were against abortions for convenience?

THIS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Jersey, Vermont, Portland. No restrictions. Shall I go on?

Yes, go on and name for us the actual clinics and doctors in those states that perform non-medically necessary abortions after the point of viability. Hell, tell us the ones that perform any abortions after the 2nd trimester, for any reason, even in the case of a mother's health. Go on. Please.

There are only two doctors in the US who do this since a forced birther murdered the third one.

The first part of that sentence is inaccurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And here it is. They’re going to lean into the abortion ban ahead of the midterms. The lesson of Trump: always double down.

This is a gimmick. Republicans have realized that the majority of Americans are opposed to total abortion bans and the Republicans want to paint themselves as the rational ones here by banning them after 15 weeks- and they will then make outlandish claims that all democrats want people to get abortions on demand up until the moment of delivery.

Republicans: let's introduce legislation that has broad popular support
Democrats: that's a gimmick!

I am the PP you are responding to and I am not a Democrat. I am a former R but not a Democrat. I would never personally get an elective abortion and am not particularly fond of the idea of people doing so but don't think legislators should be the ones makes these decisions. I don't care how popular the legislation I- not everything should be subject to popularity contests.

Republicans have completely lost me with this nonsense and gaslighting about late term abortions. Anyone who is getting an abortion past 15 weeks is doing so for reasons that are absolutely none of my business and are likely incredibly hard to deal with.

PP here, I've been a Republican since the second half of college. I don't agree with everything the Republican party has done, but it represents my viewpoints the best so I've stuck with the party. There is undeniably a compelling state interest in protecting human life, including those that are unborn. The difficulty has been in establishing the standard for that interest, not that if such an interest exists at all. Whether we like it or not, everything is up for a popularity contest - even the issues where there is no explicit contest, means there is lack of popular desire to change the issue from the current state of lack of regulation.

Regarding late term abortions, this is not gaslighting at all - it's the mainstream position of the Democrats to protect such a right. They even passed it in the House: Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA). Go read it, as long as the pregnancy is determined as a risk to the mother's health - a standard which is not defined in the act and is therefore wide open - abortion can be performed at any time.

The fact that you believe women are electing abortions at a late stage of pregnancy is not supported by facts, and is a reflection on your character, not on Democrats or women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s brilliant. It is the point at which most people agree. Prolife won’t agree to anything but I am a Republican woman from a long line of republican women (from the north, all college educated) and I want abortion legal but not unfettered. This will force democrats to own that some of them want unlimited abortion. By 15 weeks you know — that is 3 plus months in— so this means that after 15 weeks it’s off limits. But after that, the baby should have the chance. But this is about flushing out the liars and extremists in the pro abortion lobby. 12 is too soon, 20 is too late. 15 is the sweet spot and it’s going to have an impact.

You obviously don’t have very many female friends. You might think you do, but if you did you’d know a few who have had to terminate wanted pregnancies after 15 weeks. As it is, they probably disappeared from your life because you’re an idiot.

+1 million.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And here it is. They’re going to lean into the abortion ban ahead of the midterms. The lesson of Trump: always double down.

This is a gimmick. Republicans have realized that the majority of Americans are opposed to total abortion bans and the Republicans want to paint themselves as the rational ones here by banning them after 15 weeks- and they will then make outlandish claims that all democrats want people to get abortions on demand up until the moment of delivery.

Republicans: let's introduce legislation that has broad popular support
Democrats: that's a gimmick!

I am the PP you are responding to and I am not a Democrat. I am a former R but not a Democrat. I would never personally get an elective abortion and am not particularly fond of the idea of people doing so but don't think legislators should be the ones makes these decisions. I don't care how popular the legislation I- not everything should be subject to popularity contests.

Republicans have completely lost me with this nonsense and gaslighting about late term abortions. Anyone who is getting an abortion past 15 weeks is doing so for reasons that are absolutely none of my business and are likely incredibly hard to deal with.

PP here, I've been a Republican since the second half of college. I don't agree with everything the Republican party has done, but it represents my viewpoints the best so I've stuck with the party. There is undeniably a compelling state interest in protecting human life, including those that are unborn. The difficulty has been in establishing the standard for that interest, not that if such an interest exists at all. Whether we like it or not, everything is up for a popularity contest - even the issues where there is no explicit contest, means there is lack of popular desire to change the issue from the current state of lack of regulation.

Regarding late term abortions, this is not gaslighting at all - it's the mainstream position of the Democrats to protect such a right. They even passed it in the House: Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA). Go read it, as long as the pregnancy is determined as a risk to the mother's health - a standard which is not defined in the act and is therefore wide open - abortion can be performed at any time.

The fact that you believe women are electing abortions at a late stage of pregnancy is not supported by facts, and is a reflection on your character, not on Democrats or women.

+1 Hopelessly brainwashed, thinks she’s rational. Also pribabky thinks she’s a “good woman,” one of the ones who would magically be protected from the GOP’s insatiable misogyny. She’s wrong though. It will come for her, too.