Congratulations to David Blair!!!

[Anonymous]

My drop box vote hasn't even been counted yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Elrich will be to find just enough votes to squeak it out. They just need to wait a couple more days to get a final number for how many they need to win.

They’ll come up with them. Marc has a very solid operation.

What the hell does this mean? Will he count the votes that have been cast or manufacture them?

Just enough previously uncounted votes will be discovered at the last minute to put Elrich over the top.

Have they scoured the post offices?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My drop box vote hasn't even been counted yet.

That doesn't start until tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Elrich will be to find just enough votes to squeak it out. They just need to wait a couple more days to get a final number for how many they need to win.

They’ll come up with them. Marc has a very solid operation.

What the hell does this mean? Will he count the votes that have been cast or manufacture them?

Just enough previously uncounted votes will be discovered at the last minute to put Elrich over the top.

After he dogged his county employee election workers, and county resident volunteers, do you really think anyone is going to help him do anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My drop box vote hasn't even been counted yet.

That doesn't start until tomorrow.

I thought it was the provisional ballots that start being counted tomorrow. They've already been counting mailed and drop box ballots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My drop box vote hasn't even been counted yet.

That doesn't start until tomorrow.

I thought it was the provisional ballots that start being counted tomorrow. They've already been counting mailed and drop box ballots.

I'm a new pp, not the one you replied to. I literally just checked. Mine drop box ballot hasn't been counted yet either. It's marked as received but not accepted or rejected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

Aren’t they still counting? If so, it’s misleading to post numbers with no explanation, in a thread with a misleading— or at least premature— title.

Yes they’re still counting. That’s the latest update as of tonight. I didn’t write the thread title.

Thank you! I appreciate your clarification.

Sorry, I wasn’t trying to be mysterious! Just lazy. 🙂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Elrich will be to find just enough votes to squeak it out. They just need to wait a couple more days to get a final number for how many they need to win.

They’ll come up with them. Marc has a very solid operation.

What the hell does this mean? Will he count the votes that have been cast or manufacture them?

DP. It means that every vote that has been cast will be accurately counted. That includes the provisional votes. It also means that there might be a recount of the voting tallies are extremely close. It’s hard to make generalizations about who voted and who did not, or about how those who voted might vote. I think it’s fair to say that these are polarizing candidates in many ways. In the end, there probably really are more voters who support Elrich. Or who support Elrich vs the policies and the huge unknowns that would come with voting for someone like Blair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Elrich will be to find just enough votes to squeak it out. They just need to wait a couple more days to get a final number for how many they need to win.

They’ll come up with them. Marc has a very solid operation.

What the hell does this mean? Will he count the votes that have been cast or manufacture them?

DP. It means that every vote that has been cast will be accurately counted. That includes the provisional votes. It also means that there might be a recount of the voting tallies are extremely close. It’s hard to make generalizations about who voted and who did not, or about how those who voted might vote. I think it’s fair to say that these are polarizing candidates in many ways. In the end, there probably really are more voters who support Elrich. Or who support Elrich vs the policies and the huge unknowns that would come with voting for someone like Blair.

Lol I don't think that's what the PP meant, and neither one of you is right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Elrich will be to find just enough votes to squeak it out. They just need to wait a couple more days to get a final number for how many they need to win.

They’ll come up with them. Marc has a very solid operation.

What the hell does this mean? Will he count the votes that have been cast or manufacture them?

DP. It means that every vote that has been cast will be accurately counted. That includes the provisional votes. It also means that there might be a recount of the voting tallies are extremely close. It’s hard to make generalizations about who voted and who did not, or about how those who voted might vote. I think it’s fair to say that these are polarizing candidates in many ways. In the end, there probably really are more voters who support Elrich. Or who support Elrich vs the policies and the huge unknowns that would come with voting for someone like Blair.

Lol I don't think that's what the PP meant, and neither one of you is right.

You might be right about what the PP meant. As to the rest, if you have genuine information, put it out there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

Aren’t they still counting? If so, it’s misleading to post numbers with no explanation, in a thread with a misleading— or at least premature— title.

Yes they’re still counting. That’s the latest update as of tonight. I didn’t write the thread title.

Have these numbers changed since Monday evening?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

Aren’t they still counting? If so, it’s misleading to post numbers with no explanation, in a thread with a misleading— or at least premature— title.

Yes they’re still counting. That’s the latest update as of tonight. I didn’t write the thread title.

Have these numbers changed since Monday evening?

They changed last night to this:
Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

[Anonymous]

why are they taking 2 days off from counting?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

Aren’t they still counting? If so, it’s misleading to post numbers with no explanation, in a thread with a misleading— or at least premature— title.

Yes they’re still counting. That’s the latest update as of tonight. I didn’t write the thread title.

Have these numbers changed since Monday evening?

They changed last night to this:
Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

What were they before that? That looks like what I recall seeing when I checked them on Tuesday morning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

Aren’t they still counting? If so, it’s misleading to post numbers with no explanation, in a thread with a misleading— or at least premature— title.

Yes they’re still counting. That’s the latest update as of tonight. I didn’t write the thread title.

Have these numbers changed since Monday evening?

They changed last night to this:
Blair 44,722
Elrich 44,577

What were they before that? That looks like what I recall seeing when I checked them on Tuesday morning.

blair increase just over 100