
Which would you rather have? |
+1. Seriously. The mortality rate for Ebola is extremely high. Corona virus has been mild in many people. |
Source? I'd be very surprised if NYC didn't get a confirmed case before Metro D.C. |
I saw it on CNN. I've also seen additional confirmed diagnoses in California. The CDC website isn't updated and the Johns Hopkins dashboard isn't either. |
Taking the same precautions that I take for flu...swine, avian, common... |
The novel coronavirus is all over China now and all the world. Comparisons to Ebola are missing the point. |
I will keep taking Ocillococcinum as a prophylactic. |
You’re missing the point. This thread is the equivalent of 70 pages following a small flu virus outbreak. |
Except for quarantining Wuhan and all of Hubei. |
CNN is reporting that 3 people are being tested for coronavirus in DC. They are awaiting results. No verified case as of now. One test came back negative. |
I will take coronavirus over Ebola anyday. Are you kidding? |
+1 Ebola is almost always fatal unless you can get immediate advanced medical attention. What a foolish comparison. |
I, too, will have hard candy to ward off a potentially deadly virus. |
There were two suspected cases in the Twin Cities who have tested negative. |
Then you must be very happy now, because there's a real possibility that you might contract the novel coronavirus but there's no chance for you to contract Ebola. |