Spare

[Anonymous]

Imho, we don't know their intentions, circumstances or realities so passing moral judgement is unfair but we do know that they are trying to become wealthier and build a celebrity brand which branches into news media, publishing, entertainment, philanthropy, environment, investment and political power.

This leak and sensational revelations about their powerful family's past and present are establishing them as anti establishment and anti racism, all while living a lavish life and building a legacy of wealth and influence rivaling his family of origin.

Both sides of the family will be luxuriously fine. Y'all should just watch it as a reality show and post critical or appreciative reviews, no need to get emotionally involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imho, we don't know their intentions, circumstances or realities so passing moral judgement is unfair but we do know that they are trying to become wealthier and build a celebrity brand which branches into news media, publishing, entertainment, philanthropy, environment, investment and political power.

This leak and sensational revelations about their powerful family's past and present are establishing them as anti establishment and anti racism, all while living a lavish life and building a legacy of wealth and influence rivaling his family of origin.

Both sides of the family will be luxuriously fine. Y'all should just watch it as a reality show and post critical or appreciative reviews, no need to get emotionally involved.

You're failing to acknowledge that they didn't achieve what they set out to do and missed spectacularly. Whining about lip gloss, dog bowls, blue balls, and pissing your pants does none of the above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is exactly it. The rumor mill about William is BS. He is faithful and may I say just an ordinary dude who met his lifelong partner in College. It took her some time to see if it was the right fit for HER though she loved him she was t sure if she was ready for the life it entailed. Sure enough they are an amazing fit and have an incredible marriage and partnership of 20 plus years versus poor stupid Harold who was stalked and catfished by a grizzled divorcee who lies about her age and has been married at least once, it is rumored twice. He was a ripe mark indeed.

Barf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is exactly it. The rumor mill about William is BS. He is faithful and may I say just an ordinary dude who met his lifelong partner in College. It took her some time to see if it was the right fit for HER though she loved him she was t sure if she was ready for the life it entailed. Sure enough they are an amazing fit and have an incredible marriage and partnership of 20 plus years versus poor stupid Harold who was stalked and catfished by a grizzled divorcee who lies about her age and has been married at least once, it is rumored twice. He was a ripe mark indeed.

This is hilarious! Are you on palace staff? Lol!

The whole world saw William string Waitie Katie along, in public and no doubt very hurtful manner. The state of their marriage seems pretty obvious when you look at the state of her body and face - she’s miserable. And the notion that William is the one dude in the aristocracy who doesn’t feel entitled to a piece on the side whenever he pleases is the most laughable bit in your post - there is no way on earth he hasn’t had his share.

You very well could be right but its hard to judge anybody's marriage by outer facade, nobody knows can tell whole story by lovey dovey or formal behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is exactly it. The rumor mill about William is BS. He is faithful and may I say just an ordinary dude who met his lifelong partner in College. It took her some time to see if it was the right fit for HER though she loved him she was t sure if she was ready for the life it entailed. Sure enough they are an amazing fit and have an incredible marriage and partnership of 20 plus years versus poor stupid Harold who was stalked and catfished by a grizzled divorcee who lies about her age and has been married at least once, it is rumored twice. He was a ripe mark indeed.

This is hilarious! Are you on palace staff? Lol!

The whole world saw William string Waitie Katie along, in public and no doubt very hurtful manner. The state of their marriage seems pretty obvious when you look at the state of her body and face - she’s miserable. And the notion that William is the one dude in the aristocracy who doesn’t feel entitled to a piece on the side whenever he pleases is the most laughable bit in your post - there is no way on earth he hasn’t had his share.

No one knows what is happening in seomes marriage but she looks great and this comment on her appearance is misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:His father and brother tried to caution him...he didn't listen to them.

Yeah , the adulterous father is surely the person his son needed to listen to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is exactly it. The rumor mill about William is BS. He is faithful and may I say just an ordinary dude who met his lifelong partner in College. It took her some time to see if it was the right fit for HER though she loved him she was t sure if she was ready for the life it entailed. Sure enough they are an amazing fit and have an incredible marriage and partnership of 20 plus years versus poor stupid Harold who was stalked and catfished by a grizzled divorcee who lies about her age and has been married at least once, it is rumored twice. He was a ripe mark indeed.

This is hilarious! Are you on palace staff? Lol!

The whole world saw William string Waitie Katie along, in public and no doubt very hurtful manner. The state of their marriage seems pretty obvious when you look at the state of her body and face - she’s miserable. And the notion that William is the one dude in the aristocracy who doesn’t feel entitled to a piece on the side whenever he pleases is the most laughable bit in your post - there is no way on earth he hasn’t had his share.

No one knows what is happening in seomes marriage but she looks great and this comment on her appearance is misogynistic.

NP Give me a break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:62 pages — on a book that no one has read yet, based on excerpts that may or may not be accurate. Wow.

I doubt 99% of people posting here have any intention of buying it to support someone's fancy lifestyle. You can help an actual homeless eat a meal with that money.

Buying a memoir = supporting someone's fancy lifestyle . I'm loving the desperation . Too late .

People are often interested in reading celebrity gossip on internet but most aren't interested enough to read a book about or by them.

I absolutely will not but it, but will be happy to borrow it from the library next year if I remember it. It will still be trashy then. I just can’t give them a dollar.

Why would you borrow it from a library? So you're interested ,arent you ? one more thing : Your taxes pay for the library , so YOU are paying for it .

This is the dumbest argument on this thread yet. Congratulations.

Add rabid continent of Africa defender to that list.

Add impossibly ignorant maga-esque poster to the list. Reacting angrily because they're being called out on their stereotypical ignorance. From time to time turn on the national geographic, discovery Channel where you might learn a thing or two .

Calm down and go scroll through your Peace Corps Facebook photo album.

Thanks for admitting that you're ignorant. Next time refrain from venturing into topics you know nothing about . This isn't a bake sale .

The personality of the person writing the above response is the reason for so many divorces in the DC area. What an absolute ass.

No, this is one rabid poster across multiple threads that calls people ignorant and gets hella worked up about stuff - posting over and over again. She’s a crazy outlier.

Just say you hate being called out on your ignorance .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

You know I think he does need help if all this stuff in the advances are his words. Something is very wrong. I am so troubled that no one told him he was going too far and he looks unsympathetic. His piling on loses most people and these are people who want to like him. There is no way his family takes him back after this. They will be afraid to be close enough for him to announce said conversation to the world. Before I thought he should go to coronation and now no. Total hypocrisy if he goes. You cannot say what he says about his family and then expect to attend.

He's the author of the book so how could he shift blame? I know there's a ghostwriter but Harry can't blame him since Harry's name is the one on the book.

As for conversations being announced to the world, that would apply to anyone, family or friend. Who would want to risk that?

They already did it with the Netflix docs. Of course he can do it with the book!

[Anonymous]

Is anyone on here willing to discuss actual book contents? If so, I'd be interested to know if others also think that H&M now have huge targets on their back for a future terrorist attack, perhaps risking the lives of many others in the process.

Harry's comments in the book not only about his war "kills" but the fact he was doing drugs on/around the time he was in the military AND it seems he didn't have his book reviewed for security purposes before publishing indicates that an investigation should be done by the UK MOD. IMHO.

"Commenting on the claim, Major General Chip Chapman, a platoon commander in the Falklands conflict, told Times Radio: “For him, who wants privacy and security, he's just opened himself up to every jihadist and nutcase out there.”

Maj Gen Chapman, who also served as a former head of counter-terrorism at the Ministry of Defence, also shared that books from veterans like Prince Harry’s often exclude ‘sensitive details such as casualties in Iraq or Afghanistan’.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His father and brother tried to caution him...he didn't listen to them.

Yeah , the adulterous father is surely the person his son needed to listen to.

Oh, okay. Then glad for him that he's listening to his wife and is enjoying his newfound freedom and literary success.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone on here willing to discuss actual book contents? If so, I'd be interested to know if others also think that H&M now have huge targets on their back for a future terrorist attack, perhaps risking the lives of many others in the process.

Harry's comments in the book not only about his war "kills" but the fact he was doing drugs on/around the time he was in the military AND it seems he didn't have his book reviewed for security purposes before publishing indicates that an investigation should be done by the UK MOD. IMHO.

"Commenting on the claim, Major General Chip Chapman, a platoon commander in the Falklands conflict, told Times Radio: “For him, who wants privacy and security, he's just opened himself up to every jihadist and nutcase out there.”

Maj Gen Chapman, who also served as a former head of counter-terrorism at the Ministry of Defence, also shared that books from veterans like Prince Harry’s often exclude ‘sensitive details such as casualties in Iraq or Afghanistan’.

This should be the most disturbing part of the entire book not a hissy-fit between brothers or lip gloss.

[Anonymous]

Here we go ... it's started already!

Innocent people, including wounded war veterans, may now paying the price. Nice going Harry.

It won't be long before sponsors will start pulling away for the same reasons.

"Prince Harry warned Invictus Games 'at risk of terror attack' after Taliban kill claims"

Admiral Lord West, former head of the navy, said the Invictus Games will now have 'serious security issues' because of their direct connection to Prince Harry.

Lord West went on: “The Taliban will be reading it thinking there’s this prince calling us all chess pieces and is quite happy about killing us.


“And there will be a lot of people, I am sure, in Islamic State and other terrorist organisations, who will think this is something which should be avenged.”

This year’s Games will be held in Dusseldorf, Germany, in September.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/prince-harry-warned-invictus-games-28900027

[Anonymous]

Wasn’t the book vetted for such details before being published?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t the book vetted for such details before being published?

This is my question too.