Prosecutor to Investigate Origins of FBI Trump-Russia Probe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

Here's your unicorn.

[Anonymous]

Democrats who wanted the Mueller investigation should welcome this investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats who wanted the Mueller investigation should welcome this investigation.

Welcome it? It's silly and, when nothing comes of it, won't settle anything, since the naysayers will just continue to make stuff up. But I'm not opposed to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

There are many "citizen journalists" doing investigation into the claims of the dossier.

Here is one on Twitter who debunks some of the claims in the dossier using testimony, emails, and texts that have been revealed.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129020561684869127

And, one more thing...........

Despite the nay sayers - FOX was more correct about the whole "Russian collusion" narrative than any of the other networks or left-wing print media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats who wanted the Mueller investigation should welcome this investigation.

Welcome it? It's silly and, when nothing comes of it, won't settle anything, since the naysayers will just continue to make stuff up. But I'm not opposed to it.

It's all TBD. But I wouldn't get too comfortable with the idea that all is well. Trump's candidacy was seen as a threat to many bailiwicks and cash flow streams, don't be surprised if there were folks who did illegal things to protect those bailiwicks and cash flows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats who wanted the Mueller investigation should welcome this investigation.

Welcome it? It's silly and, when nothing comes of it, won't settle anything, since the naysayers will just continue to make stuff up. But I'm not opposed to it.

Time will tell! But I think it is a good idea to check it out. Sure some will dismiss any findings that reveal no conspiracy but that is no different than some liberals who insist there is was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia although Mueller says there was none.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

There are many "citizen journalists" doing investigation into the claims of the dossier.

Here is one on Twitter who debunks some of the claims in the dossier using testimony, emails, and texts that have been revealed.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129020561684869127

And, one more thing...........

Despite the nay sayers - FOX was more correct about the whole "Russian collusion" narrative than any of the other networks or left-wing print media.

+1

I'm DCUM's most vocal 'left' voice crapping on the MSM's Russia narrative and have been at that since 2016. A lot of so-called 'right-leaning' media was just simply disagreeing with the MSM's hype, but there were many 'right-leaning' journos (Chuck Ross is prolly number 1) who did much better reporting than anyone at WaPo, NYT, MSNBC, etc.


I desperately want to see the bottom of origins story and I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was very, very ugly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

There are many "citizen journalists" doing investigation into the claims of the dossier.

Here is one on Twitter who debunks some of the claims in the dossier using testimony, emails, and texts that have been revealed.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129020561684869127

And, one more thing...........

Despite the nay sayers - FOX was more correct about the whole "Russian collusion" narrative than any of the other networks or left-wing print media.

+1

I'm DCUM's most vocal 'left' voice crapping on the MSM's Russia narrative and have been at that since 2016. A lot of so-called 'right-leaning' media was just simply disagreeing with the MSM's hype, but there were many 'right-leaning' journos (Chuck Ross is prolly number 1) who did much better reporting than anyone at WaPo, NYT, MSNBC, etc.


I desperately want to see the bottom of origins story and I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was very, very ugly.

Solomon should get a Pulitzer. But he won’t

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

There are many "citizen journalists" doing investigation into the claims of the dossier.

Here is one on Twitter who debunks some of the claims in the dossier using testimony, emails, and texts that have been revealed.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129020561684869127

And, one more thing...........

Despite the nay sayers - FOX was more correct about the whole "Russian collusion" narrative than any of the other networks or left-wing print media.

Huh. So because Steele and/or some Russian doesn't know the difference between Miama and Tampa, it proves the dossier is fake.

Uh, what is the difference between Miama and Tampa? I don't know the difference either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

There are many "citizen journalists" doing investigation into the claims of the dossier.

Here is one on Twitter who debunks some of the claims in the dossier using testimony, emails, and texts that have been revealed.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129020561684869127

And, one more thing...........

Despite the nay sayers - FOX was more correct about the whole "Russian collusion" narrative than any of the other networks or left-wing print media.

+1

I'm DCUM's most vocal 'left' voice crapping on the MSM's Russia narrative and have been at that since 2016. A lot of so-called 'right-leaning' media was just simply disagreeing with the MSM's hype, but there were many 'right-leaning' journos (Chuck Ross is prolly number 1) who did much better reporting than anyone at WaPo, NYT, MSNBC, etc.


I desperately want to see the bottom of origins story and I wouldn't be at all surprised if it was very, very ugly.

Solomon should get a Pulitzer. But he won’t

Right? Because Solomon starts with his conclusion and works backward from there. Definitely deserves a Pulitzer for that.

[Anonymous]

Solomon, Ross, and Carter put much skin in the game of others exposing the asymmetries that exist in our society. And there are many who still have much skin in the game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Solomon, Ross, and Carter put much skin in the game of others exposing the asymmetries that exist in our society. And there are many who still have much skin in the game.

What are you trying to say?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have seen analyses of the Steele dossier that go paragraph by paragraph and note which points in the dossier have been confirmed. Seemed to me around 70% of it or more has been confirmed.

I have never seen any analysis of it that similarly went through, paragraph by paragraph, showing which things in it have been disproven.

FOX and others in conservative media seem heavily invested in pushing a narrative that it's "fake." You'd think that an honest investigative journalism outlet would have done such a detailed analysis. But they didn't. Shows you the honesty of the conservative media isn't quite there. They are more about pushing propaganda than real news.

There aren't many honest journalists, let alone honest journalism outlets. FOX has serious issues, but don't think those who hyped this Russia narrative (and made bank off of it), like MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc., aren't also seriously suspect.

Dossier fake. Investigation much needed. Back to rule of law. Sorry Dems.

There are many "citizen journalists" doing investigation into the claims of the dossier.

Here is one on Twitter who debunks some of the claims in the dossier using testimony, emails, and texts that have been revealed.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1129020561684869127

And, one more thing...........

Despite the nay sayers - FOX was more correct about the whole "Russian collusion" narrative than any of the other networks or left-wing print media.

Huh. So because Steele and/or some Russian doesn't know the difference between Miama and Tampa, it proves the dossier is fake.

Uh, what is the difference between Miama and Tampa? I don't know the difference either.

About 300 miles. And, the difference, culturally, is even larger.
You would think a Russian would know where the Russian Consulate is.
More importantly, you would think the FBI would know where the FBI consulate was. They should have recognized this as inaccurate immediately.