Exxon CEO to be SOS

[Anonymous]

I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Which elites would those be and how do they make their money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

Actually, yes. Think about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

Hillary is a private citizen now and irrelevant.

And yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

Actually, yes. Think about it.

He will no longer be connected to Exxon ...... Hillary was SoS even while her husband was actively involved with the Clinton Foundation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

Actually, yes. Think about it.

He will no longer be connected to Exxon ...... Hillary was SoS even while her husband was actively involved with the Clinton Foundation.

Keep thinking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Which elites would those be and how do they make their money.

Texas oil interests, duh.

[Anonymous]

oh to be a whip counter for this one.

flake and rubio could defect in committee.

if it brings to a floor vote,

mccain, graham, collins, rubio, flake should be targeted by dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

Actually, yes. Think about it.

He will no longer be connected to Exxon ...... Hillary was SoS even while her husband was actively involved with the Clinton Foundation.

Trumpkins are very bad at logic. Unsurprisingly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think he is a great choice ...... he is universally praised by people who should know.

Because of his connection to Exxon, he would be irredeemably compromised. If not in actuality, then in appearance.

More compromised than Hillary and the Clinton Foundation?

Actually, yes. Think about it.

He will no longer be connected to Exxon ...... Hillary was SoS even while her husband was actively involved with the Clinton Foundation.

You mean like trump being president while his kids are still actively involved in his business? Huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oh to be a whip counter for this one.

flake and rubio could defect in committee.

if it brings to a floor vote,

mccain, graham, collins, rubio, flake should be targeted by dems.

Add in Rand Paul.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oh to be a whip counter for this one.

flake and rubio could defect in committee.

if it brings to a floor vote,

mccain, graham, collins, rubio, flake should be targeted by dems.

Add in Rand Paul.

no. Rex riles up the opposite of the neocon picks.

RP would stop Rudy and Bolton.

I think he'll vote for Tillerson. WHich is why the calculus shifts in committee. For people like bolton, rp was the bulwark in committee. but now it's flake and rubio we need to look at.