*hate hosting |
It a link from DOJ...https://www.nsopw.gov/en-US/Education/FactsStatistics But I can get the same info from CDC, RAINN, onein6, on and on... This is so well known in the industry, and sad the public is so uninformed. You can't handle the truth! Please share a statistic that shows women are the majority of sexual offenders. I would love to know where you get that? |
+1 Jesus. |
+2 |
Oh for Christi's sake not ONE fucking person on this thread said that that majority of sex offenders are women. But it's more than 1% and I suspect you fucking know that.
I hope to god you don't have any sons. Your victim mentality and obvious destain for anyone with a penis is disgusting. And I'm a woman btw. |
I've never said that. I've only said that you've wildly misappropriated your numbers. None of your links give the numbers that you randomly mashed together. You posted some numbers and several people questioned where you got those numbers, so you posted one link (now two) and neither of them gives any of the number that you cited. You said 70% of the time children who are under 9...are assaulted by someone NOT in their own age group. The report says that 34% of assault victims are 9 years or younger. If you look at the source of that report's footnoted source https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/cm2012.pdf (pp 61-62), it says that only 0.2% of perpetrators were in the 6-11 year old range and only 2.2% were in the 12-17 year old range. So, 2.4% of perpetrators were juvenile. The closest number you can get to 70% of if you add the numbers for perpetrator ages from 25-54 and which gives 72.4%. You said 40% of the time the perpetrator is an aquaintance, but the quote is "An estimated 60% of perpetrators of sexual abuse are known to the child but are not family members, e.g., family friends, babysitters, child care providers, neighbors." which is more than just aquaintances, it's anyone not family. The site you cite also says that 30% of perpetrators are family, so actually 70% are non-family acquaintances. And from the reference article, it says
And you cited article says that 95% not 99% of arrest cases perpetrators were male. This is only arrest cases. Some additional notes from the same site that you reference:
The latter suggesting that when the abuser is the mother, the child is less likely to disclose the abuse. All data suggests that the 95% of reported cases is a very high estimate. I'm not arguing that women are more likely to be perpetrators, and I agree whole-heartedly that men are significant majority of cases, but I would suspect (this is pure conjecture) that the actual numbers are closer to 80% male and 20% female perpetrators. The end result is that you throw out numbers and statistics with no valid references and when you are pressed for references, you cite references that don't back your numbers and you expect people to believe what you say? |
| negative points for being male, but I'd guess you're less likely to do something awful if you're gay, tbh. I think men who present as straight are more likely to abuse kids of either sex. prefer a mom to be home but if I knew you well enough then of course I'd say yes. |
No one said majority. They just said men are not 99% responsible for abuse cases. |
You are right, it is 95%. |
|
Side note: Three cheers for someone using NSOPW as a reference!
|
Source? |
|
Already posted. Men are so sensitive. |