Ugh, small rings mean the guy is cheap. I can't believe you'd wear that speck around. |
Mine was close to this. $5,500 1.6 center stone, no visible inclusions and very good color/cut. DH purchased at a jewelry exchange in 2000. Much cheaper than at a commercial jewelry store. Another $1,500 for eternity band. |
No, but an engagement ring is all about promise. They rocketed way beyond promise and marriage and already have a baby. The ring is kinda beyond the point, wouldn't you say? |
Emeralds and rubies do not stand up as well to daily wear as do diamonds. |
|
$90 ring poster again. I'm not playing the frugal smugness game and don't begrudge anyone else their jewelry.
I just like my ring, it fits our budget, and I don't worry about wearing it anywhere because if (...who are we kidding. When.) it falls off my hand somewhere, I'll be sad for sure, but it's replaceable. |
| i love jewelry. i love diamonds. always have, always will. unapologetic about my 2.5 carat ring. i don't judge anyone big or small for what they have. i know what i wanted for myself, though. |
Not the person you're replying to but -- screw you. They get to decide what it means to them. When we were able to finally get married after 15 years of partnership and kids (thanks, marriage equality!) you're damn right I wanted a diamond on my finger. It's the prettiest piece of jewelry I've ever owned and damned if I was going to pass up the chance to have a beautiful sparkly wedding set on my finger just because we didn't do things in the "right" order. And straight folks have the right to do it their way, too. Quit being the jewelry police. |
No, I disagree (obviously). The engagement ring is a promise to be married. You don't get to day well we don't need to get married now since we have a baby. Marriage is a different step. And you also don't know why they decided to have a child before marriage and also, it's not your business (because you're not the Pope or God or anyone that matters) |
I'm the poster that poster was responding to and thank you for that response. I was trying to be nice, but when I read your response I thought, that's what I wanted to say!! |
| 800 or so. It's a David Yurman ring. |
Meant to add it's my birth stone with diamonds. |
Likewise, but we had it reset which was 3-4k (?). The diamond itself is from the 1910s and beautiful, valued at 10k. |
Wow! It must be absolutely gorgeous!! |
800 dollars or 800k? |
Amen. We could afford it and I unabashedly love it, love that DH picked it out, love how it looks on my hand. As long as you feel that way about it who cares how much it cost? |