Restoring rigor in high schools

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid is taking AP Seminar this year and it's his first AP class. He's always been in H.English. Except he cannot write a cohesive essay. Not only that, but he doesn't even know the questions to ask himself in order to write the essay.

He had a big assignment due this week. He wasn't able to do it. I ended up creating templates for him to complete. We needed to do template A which fed to template B which fed to the actual assignment. Of course, this took much longer than the time allotted.

He worked hard and more importantly, I taught him some new skills that he can use in the future. We both wish that he had one more day so he could do a review of his draft, make edits, and turn in a more finished product. But a deadline is a deadline.

I was surprised that he really couldn't even get started on the assignment without me. Whatever grade he gets is fine. In this case, the grade is irrelevant. He needs to learn these skills. I would have thought that the critical thinking and analytical skills would have been taught in earlier grades. The scaffolding that I created for him seemed more like something I would have done in middle school back in the last century.

My sons experience mirrors what I see in my classes at UMD. My students understand the math concepts I teach but they cannot covey the information they learn in a written document. They cannot create a thesis statement, provide supporting information, do an analysis, and then summarize the information.

Other than doing it myself or getting a tutor for my son, I don't know what to do. This is a skill that requires practice and refinement over years. It's not being taught in his public schools (MS/HS). I understand why---it requires a lot of time and effort for a teacher to grade an essay and provide meaningful feedback. With 25+ kids in a class and multiple classes, that seems overwhelming for a teacher.


What is AP seminar? Is that an actual class?


Yes, it's an actual class. https://apstudents.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-seminar
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids at the top are being pushed too hard with the AP arms race and the expectation that everyone has to have. 1550+ SAT to get into a top school. The kids who are not at the very top are often ignored or allowed to fall through the cracks. The kids who need the most help also get a lot of attention. We have a two-tiered system that caters to the very top and the ones struggling the most and sort of neglects a lot of people in the middle.


Are we talking public school? People at the top are absolutely not a focal point. They're being ignored to the point they’re allowing kids that are not as smart to think they're part of the "smart" group by osmosis and lowering the ceiling. This is what's bringing down public schools. It's a bizarro world where everyone has to be mediocre so that average and below average kids can be told they’re smart.

Our kids are bored out of their mind in school and they've always taken the hardest classes (enriched, honors, AP, DE), many with mediocre teachers and struggling classmates who shouldn't be there. If kids can't keep up with the pathetic curriculum in the internet age, maybe it's time for less finger pointing and more self-reflection.

I think too many people on this forum were not top students when they were kids nor did they associate with them. They don't know what it means. Somewhere along the line, they became parents and they now equivocate good grades or hrs studying with thinking their kids are really smart. Because that's how it used to be. Nowadays, the grades are inflated and the work is not as rigorous so studying shouldn't take that much time. A top student shouldn't struggle in high school level classes, and that includes the watered down AP classes

Maybe it’s time for you to be a good parent and put them in better schools. I was a top student at a known boarding school and so was DH. We both have kids who are doing much more than us and are experiencing rigorous schooling.

Sometimes, you, the parents, are the problem.


DP here. We can’t afford boarding school or even non-religious private school. It’s not about being a “better” parent. My kids have straight A’s in rigorous classes. So far the oldest has 4’s and 5’s on her AP tests. But each year I’d say they have 1-2 very good teachers, 1-2 serviceable teachers and 1-2 teachers where you wonder how in the h&ll this person is allowed to teach anyone anything. Waiting for the class schedule in August feels like Russian roulette.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where your kids go to school but my kids work much harder than I ever did. And they know much more than I ever did. There needs to be more chill and less stress


100% this. I was salutatorian and had all As when I graduated in the early 1990s. What my children are learning in school and the level of effort they have to put in runs circles around my education. And they are more stressed than I ever was.


Yes, this is a problem that started in the mid-80s and continues to this day. Graduated in the late 70s, had my kids late in life. Even with APs they didn’t do the level of work I had at a small school system. Calculus (MV) was the capstone math class for kids targeted for college and we did much more in our science classes. School offered robust vo-tech opportunities for students that wanted to pursue work in the trades.

Need to get back to instructional basics, demand and reward rigor and have multiple paths forward. Opportunity for all not equal outcomes for all.

You completely bulldozed their comment. Most kids today are working harder than when we were growing up.


DP. But working harder doesn’t mean they are learning more.

I teach AP classes. Yes, the students are always working hard; however, it takes much longer to for students to complete tasks than it used to.

Students today often lack resilience. When an assignment gets burdensome or challenging, they tend to shut down. I coax far more than I did 20 years ago.

I also receive 3-4 times the extension requests than I used to because there’s often an excuse why work can’t get done: I’m too busy, I have sports, I wasn’t in a good mood.

That honestly makes a lot of sense. If we are overburdening our students and they're constantly working, they will eventually perform worse and will not be able to turn things in. Have you considered that there is no proof that homework is actually beneficial to one's education? It makes sense In lower ages where we treat school as a way to form discipline, but there is no reason we have to work a high schooler to death to provide them a good education.



It isn’t just that we are overburdening our kids, they are also being preyed upon by digital content providers. It’s encouraging that they are beginning to stand up for themselves.

Agree, the PP is exhibiting bias. Seems far too many teachers stay in the profession out of a sadistic drive to mock kids. AP teacher just means you’ve churned through freshman level content on repeat for twenty years. The students have a mental hurdle to engage, your life is menial, so you lash out. Unfortunately, you are exactly like teachers of the past.


Never disappoint, DCUM.

Can you point out where I mocked children? What did I say comes across as sadistic?

We can have an honest discussion about what’s best for the students and how to sincerely, purposefully increase rigor OR we can lash out in unsubstantiated personal attacks. We can see which option you selected.


You’re here to say students today are less capable and more entitled than twenty years ago. I’m here as a parent of two successful college student despite any number of crappy teachers. If you tell me you’ve been teaching for decades just so you can berate your students, I’ll assume that’s a you problem. Sorry there are enough bad apples that you get lumped in unless proven otherwise. That’s the reality of an education degree.


So we aren’t having a serious discussion. Got it.

I just did the math. I’ve taught over 2,600 students. 3 schools. 2 counties.

You are a parent of 2 former students.

I have more experience and a wider view than you. We can agree on that, correct?

And I haven’t berated children. You know this, so it is pointless to pretend that I’ve said anything rude on this thread. I made one comment that claims, overall, students’ abilities in the classroom have declined over 20 years. And that’s true. I could point out assignments, work samples, etc. to quantifiably prove it. This doesn’t insult you, your children, or even my current students. It’s an insight made by somebody with a clear, sustained view of the problem: me.

Now we can ignore this problem, or we can address it. I’ve been addressing it. I’m on curricula committees, I present directly to my county’s board, etc.

Oh, and… I have multiple degrees and none are in Education. Nevertheless, I don’t appreciate your insult about Ed degrees. I work with many honest, hard-working, intelligent people with Ed degrees. You will not insult them to me without getting called out for it. Personal attacks are childish and useless. Bring adult behavior to adult conversations.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids at the top are being pushed too hard with the AP arms race and the expectation that everyone has to have. 1550+ SAT to get into a top school. The kids who are not at the very top are often ignored or allowed to fall through the cracks. The kids who need the most help also get a lot of attention. We have a two-tiered system that caters to the very top and the ones struggling the most and sort of neglects a lot of people in the middle.


Are we talking public school? People at the top are absolutely not a focal point. They're being ignored to the point they’re allowing kids that are not as smart to think they're part of the "smart" group by osmosis and lowering the ceiling. This is what's bringing down public schools. It's a bizarro world where everyone has to be mediocre so that average and below average kids can be told they’re smart.

Our kids are bored out of their mind in school and they've always taken the hardest classes (enriched, honors, AP, DE), many with mediocre teachers and struggling classmates who shouldn't be there. If kids can't keep up with the pathetic curriculum in the internet age, maybe it's time for less finger pointing and more self-reflection.

I think too many people on this forum were not top students when they were kids nor did they associate with them. They don't know what it means. Somewhere along the line, they became parents and they now equivocate good grades or hrs studying with thinking their kids are really smart. Because that's how it used to be. Nowadays, the grades are inflated and the work is not as rigorous so studying shouldn't take that much time. A top student shouldn't struggle in high school level classes, and that includes the watered down AP classes

Maybe it’s time for you to be a good parent and put them in better schools. I was a top student at a known boarding school and so was DH. We both have kids who are doing much more than us and are experiencing rigorous schooling.

Sometimes, you, the parents, are the problem.


DP here. We can’t afford boarding school or even non-religious private school. It’s not about being a “better” parent. My kids have straight A’s in rigorous classes. So far the oldest has 4’s and 5’s on her AP tests. But each year I’d say they have 1-2 very good teachers, 1-2 serviceable teachers and 1-2 teachers where you wonder how in the h&ll this person is allowed to teach anyone anything. Waiting for the class schedule in August feels like Russian roulette.

I mean I went to private school. Then college and eventually grad school. I feel like this has always been true? I think the issue with public school is that teachers have so many students. So even good teachers are overwhelmed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where your kids go to school but my kids work much harder than I ever did. And they know much more than I ever did. There needs to be more chill and less stress


100% this. I was salutatorian and had all As when I graduated in the early 1990s. What my children are learning in school and the level of effort they have to put in runs circles around my education. And they are more stressed than I ever was.


Yes, this is a problem that started in the mid-80s and continues to this day. Graduated in the late 70s, had my kids late in life. Even with APs they didn’t do the level of work I had at a small school system. Calculus (MV) was the capstone math class for kids targeted for college and we did much more in our science classes. School offered robust vo-tech opportunities for students that wanted to pursue work in the trades.

Need to get back to instructional basics, demand and reward rigor and have multiple paths forward. Opportunity for all not equal outcomes for all.

You completely bulldozed their comment. Most kids today are working harder than when we were growing up.


DP. But working harder doesn’t mean they are learning more.

I teach AP classes. Yes, the students are always working hard; however, it takes much longer to for students to complete tasks than it used to.

Students today often lack resilience. When an assignment gets burdensome or challenging, they tend to shut down. I coax far more than I did 20 years ago.

I also receive 3-4 times the extension requests than I used to because there’s often an excuse why work can’t get done: I’m too busy, I have sports, I wasn’t in a good mood.

That honestly makes a lot of sense. If we are overburdening our students and they're constantly working, they will eventually perform worse and will not be able to turn things in. Have you considered that there is no proof that homework is actually beneficial to one's education? It makes sense In lower ages where we treat school as a way to form discipline, but there is no reason we have to work a high schooler to death to provide them a good education.



It isn’t just that we are overburdening our kids, they are also being preyed upon by digital content providers. It’s encouraging that they are beginning to stand up for themselves.

Agree, the PP is exhibiting bias. Seems far too many teachers stay in the profession out of a sadistic drive to mock kids. AP teacher just means you’ve churned through freshman level content on repeat for twenty years. The students have a mental hurdle to engage, your life is menial, so you lash out. Unfortunately, you are exactly like teachers of the past.


Never disappoint, DCUM.

Can you point out where I mocked children? What did I say comes across as sadistic?

We can have an honest discussion about what’s best for the students and how to sincerely, purposefully increase rigor OR we can lash out in unsubstantiated personal attacks. We can see which option you selected.


You’re here to say students today are less capable and more entitled than twenty years ago. I’m here as a parent of two successful college student despite any number of crappy teachers. If you tell me you’ve been teaching for decades just so you can berate your students, I’ll assume that’s a you problem. Sorry there are enough bad apples that you get lumped in unless proven otherwise. That’s the reality of an education degree.


So we aren’t having a serious discussion. Got it.

I just did the math. I’ve taught over 2,600 students. 3 schools. 2 counties.

You are a parent of 2 former students.

I have more experience and a wider view than you. We can agree on that, correct?

And I haven’t berated children. You know this, so it is pointless to pretend that I’ve said anything rude on this thread. I made one comment that claims, overall, students’ abilities in the classroom have declined over 20 years. And that’s true. I could point out assignments, work samples, etc. to quantifiably prove it. This doesn’t insult you, your children, or even my current students. It’s an insight made by somebody with a clear, sustained view of the problem: me.

Now we can ignore this problem, or we can address it. I’ve been addressing it. I’m on curricula committees, I present directly to my county’s board, etc.

Oh, and… I have multiple degrees and none are in Education. Nevertheless, I don’t appreciate your insult about Ed degrees. I work with many honest, hard-working, intelligent people with Ed degrees. You will not insult them to me without getting called out for it. Personal attacks are childish and useless. Bring adult behavior to adult conversations.

Not PP. So I’m curious. As a parent of kids in public schools, how can I help my kids be prepared? They are in higher level classes. We have always read. I’ve tried to teach them different executive function skills and study methods.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids at the top are being pushed too hard with the AP arms race and the expectation that everyone has to have. 1550+ SAT to get into a top school. The kids who are not at the very top are often ignored or allowed to fall through the cracks. The kids who need the most help also get a lot of attention. We have a two-tiered system that caters to the very top and the ones struggling the most and sort of neglects a lot of people in the middle.


Are we talking public school? People at the top are absolutely not a focal point. They're being ignored to the point they’re allowing kids that are not as smart to think they're part of the "smart" group by osmosis and lowering the ceiling. This is what's bringing down public schools. It's a bizarro world where everyone has to be mediocre so that average and below average kids can be told they’re smart.

Our kids are bored out of their mind in school and they've always taken the hardest classes (enriched, honors, AP, DE), many with mediocre teachers and struggling classmates who shouldn't be there. If kids can't keep up with the pathetic curriculum in the internet age, maybe it's time for less finger pointing and more self-reflection.

I think too many people on this forum were not top students when they were kids nor did they associate with them. They don't know what it means. Somewhere along the line, they became parents and they now equivocate good grades or hrs studying with thinking their kids are really smart. Because that's how it used to be. Nowadays, the grades are inflated and the work is not as rigorous so studying shouldn't take that much time. A top student shouldn't struggle in high school level classes, and that includes the watered down AP classes

Maybe it’s time for you to be a good parent and put them in better schools. I was a top student at a known boarding school and so was DH. We both have kids who are doing much more than us and are experiencing rigorous schooling.

Sometimes, you, the parents, are the problem.


DP here. We can’t afford boarding school or even non-religious private school. It’s not about being a “better” parent. My kids have straight A’s in rigorous classes. So far the oldest has 4’s and 5’s on her AP tests. But each year I’d say they have 1-2 very good teachers, 1-2 serviceable teachers and 1-2 teachers where you wonder how in the h&ll this person is allowed to teach anyone anything. Waiting for the class schedule in August feels like Russian roulette.

You’re just describing public education…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know where your kids go to school but my kids work much harder than I ever did. And they know much more than I ever did. There needs to be more chill and less stress


100% this. I was salutatorian and had all As when I graduated in the early 1990s. What my children are learning in school and the level of effort they have to put in runs circles around my education. And they are more stressed than I ever was.


Yes, this is a problem that started in the mid-80s and continues to this day. Graduated in the late 70s, had my kids late in life. Even with APs they didn’t do the level of work I had at a small school system. Calculus (MV) was the capstone math class for kids targeted for college and we did much more in our science classes. School offered robust vo-tech opportunities for students that wanted to pursue work in the trades.

Need to get back to instructional basics, demand and reward rigor and have multiple paths forward. Opportunity for all not equal outcomes for all.

You completely bulldozed their comment. Most kids today are working harder than when we were growing up.


DP. But working harder doesn’t mean they are learning more.

I teach AP classes. Yes, the students are always working hard; however, it takes much longer to for students to complete tasks than it used to.

Students today often lack resilience. When an assignment gets burdensome or challenging, they tend to shut down. I coax far more than I did 20 years ago.

I also receive 3-4 times the extension requests than I used to because there’s often an excuse why work can’t get done: I’m too busy, I have sports, I wasn’t in a good mood.

That honestly makes a lot of sense. If we are overburdening our students and they're constantly working, they will eventually perform worse and will not be able to turn things in. Have you considered that there is no proof that homework is actually beneficial to one's education? It makes sense In lower ages where we treat school as a way to form discipline, but there is no reason we have to work a high schooler to death to provide them a good education.



It isn’t just that we are overburdening our kids, they are also being preyed upon by digital content providers. It’s encouraging that they are beginning to stand up for themselves.

Agree, the PP is exhibiting bias. Seems far too many teachers stay in the profession out of a sadistic drive to mock kids. AP teacher just means you’ve churned through freshman level content on repeat for twenty years. The students have a mental hurdle to engage, your life is menial, so you lash out. Unfortunately, you are exactly like teachers of the past.


Never disappoint, DCUM.

Can you point out where I mocked children? What did I say comes across as sadistic?

We can have an honest discussion about what’s best for the students and how to sincerely, purposefully increase rigor OR we can lash out in unsubstantiated personal attacks. We can see which option you selected.


You’re here to say students today are less capable and more entitled than twenty years ago. I’m here as a parent of two successful college student despite any number of crappy teachers. If you tell me you’ve been teaching for decades just so you can berate your students, I’ll assume that’s a you problem. Sorry there are enough bad apples that you get lumped in unless proven otherwise. That’s the reality of an education degree.


So we aren’t having a serious discussion. Got it.

I just did the math. I’ve taught over 2,600 students. 3 schools. 2 counties.

You are a parent of 2 former students.

I have more experience and a wider view than you. We can agree on that, correct?

And I haven’t berated children. You know this, so it is pointless to pretend that I’ve said anything rude on this thread. I made one comment that claims, overall, students’ abilities in the classroom have declined over 20 years. And that’s true. I could point out assignments, work samples, etc. to quantifiably prove it. This doesn’t insult you, your children, or even my current students. It’s an insight made by somebody with a clear, sustained view of the problem: me.

Now we can ignore this problem, or we can address it. I’ve been addressing it. I’m on curricula committees, I present directly to my county’s board, etc.

Oh, and… I have multiple degrees and none are in Education. Nevertheless, I don’t appreciate your insult about Ed degrees. I work with many honest, hard-working, intelligent people with Ed degrees. You will not insult them to me without getting called out for it. Personal attacks are childish and useless. Bring adult behavior to adult conversations.

Not PP. So I’m curious. As a parent of kids in public schools, how can I help my kids be prepared? They are in higher level classes. We have always read. I’ve tried to teach them different executive function skills and study methods.


Hi PP,

It sounds like you’re already doing a lot! Reading at home is wonderful. Not only does it develop an appreciation for literature and an understanding of language, but it also helps foster that delayed reaction that seems to challenge many students. With stories, you have to commit to the task of reading and you have to patiently wait for resolution. That alone is huge in an environment that encourages short attention spans (social media, etc).

And executive function skills can really make/break a high school experience, and I say this as the parent of a special needs child who finds this a challenge. The fact you’re working on this at home, hopefully coupled with some strategies employed by the school, is also great.

I suspect you’re already addressing this, as well: overcoming challenges. I sit with students often (5-6 times a week, at least) and I have to encourage them over a roadblock: a failed assignment, a concept they don’t understand. I really think one of the biggest challenges we face right now is resilience. It’s okay to hit a road block. It happens to all of us. What matters most is how we react. Do we shut down, or do we accept the challenge and put in the extra effort?

And also: do students know how to find their resources? Do they go to tutoring or ask for extra help when they start to fall behind, or do they wait until the problem is larger? We spend time in my class reflecting: where do we stand with the current material? That piece helps catch problems early.

Thank you for the great question. I actually started thinking I should check in on my own kid tonight and one of her recent roadblocks. Thanks!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids at the top are being pushed too hard with the AP arms race and the expectation that everyone has to have. 1550+ SAT to get into a top school. The kids who are not at the very top are often ignored or allowed to fall through the cracks. The kids who need the most help also get a lot of attention. We have a two-tiered system that caters to the very top and the ones struggling the most and sort of neglects a lot of people in the middle.


Are we talking public school? People at the top are absolutely not a focal point. They're being ignored to the point they’re allowing kids that are not as smart to think they're part of the "smart" group by osmosis and lowering the ceiling. This is what's bringing down public schools. It's a bizarro world where everyone has to be mediocre so that average and below average kids can be told they’re smart.

Our kids are bored out of their mind in school and they've always taken the hardest classes (enriched, honors, AP, DE), many with mediocre teachers and struggling classmates who shouldn't be there. If kids can't keep up with the pathetic curriculum in the internet age, maybe it's time for less finger pointing and more self-reflection.

I think too many people on this forum were not top students when they were kids nor did they associate with them. They don't know what it means. Somewhere along the line, they became parents and they now equivocate good grades or hrs studying with thinking their kids are really smart. Because that's how it used to be. Nowadays, the grades are inflated and the work is not as rigorous so studying shouldn't take that much time. A top student shouldn't struggle in high school level classes, and that includes the watered down AP classes

Maybe it’s time for you to be a good parent and put them in better schools. I was a top student at a known boarding school and so was DH. We both have kids who are doing much more than us and are experiencing rigorous schooling.

Sometimes, you, the parents, are the problem.


DP here. We can’t afford boarding school or even non-religious private school. It’s not about being a “better” parent. My kids have straight A’s in rigorous classes. So far the oldest has 4’s and 5’s on her AP tests. But each year I’d say they have 1-2 very good teachers, 1-2 serviceable teachers and 1-2 teachers where you wonder how in the h&ll this person is allowed to teach anyone anything. Waiting for the class schedule in August feels like Russian roulette.

I mean I went to private school. Then college and eventually grad school. I feel like this has always been true? I think the issue with public school is that teachers have so many students. So even good teachers are overwhelmed.


In college and grad school you have a lot more say over your classes and professors. In HS, if you get the mean, crappy English teacher, the guidance counselors have no sympathy even though they know this teacher is universally despised.
Anonymous
High school is terrible now because adults always put their needs over kids.

1. Schools are horribly run by people who can’t manage employees, budgets or organizations. This often creates a toxic environment for teachers. Teaching is not attracting candidates qualified to teach. More money often just creates more failed initiatives, a windfall for contractors, or positions that contribute nothing to student learning.
2. Class sizes and administrative demands along with no consequences have led to teachers no longer providing feedback, grading in a timely manner, or doing a quality job. It’s all about how to cut corners.
3. Technology has been implemented to benefit the adults not the kids. It’s used to reduce grading, enable larger class sizes where most of the class does nothing.
4. Colleges have become predatory businesses chasing selectivity and rank. They have fueled the mental health crisis with opaque high stakes admissions. They have become unaffordable. They motivate students who otherwise wouldn’t cheat to cheat, normalizing it.
5. Best teaching practices are never enforced pushing more kids on 504 plans. It’s shocking how many accommodations are actually just best practices that better teaching or teacher management would solve.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:In order to reform education system, standardized test may be reinstated, but it barely touch the root issue.

High schools should stop GPA inflation, should provide rigorous grading and rigorous courses. Stop giving 20% of the class 4.0 GPAs. It's just insane. Straight As should be reserved for the truely gifted.

ECs should be done out of true passion. No gaming the system. Colleges should not consider high school research in admissions so that only kids with true passion will pursue it, not fake it.

High school counselors should verify a student's ECs before they send out the app.

High schools should encourage kids taking courses of highest rigor available to their schools, be it stem or humanities. Colleges should put a lot more weight on course rigor in admissions.

Be honest.

Have integrity.



Excellent post.
Anonymous
People who complain about lack of rigor, often not always, are bemoaning that their kid isn’t differentiated enough to colleges. It’s not a high school’s purpose to differentiate enough to appease college admissions.

You do not want top scores to be impossible to achieve or rare. This guarantees they will be arbitrary and biased in qualitative courses with teachers selecting a few favorites. For quantitative courses deflationary curves are toxic to students. They motivate cheating and sabotage.

The purpose of a high school is to develop mastery of the course material, push learning, and develop skills. Students have a right to know what is expected to earn a top score and they should have equal access to materials to obtain it if they desire. This doesn’t mean it should be easy, far from it. It should require work but it should always be achievable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids at the top are being pushed too hard with the AP arms race and the expectation that everyone has to have. 1550+ SAT to get into a top school. The kids who are not at the very top are often ignored or allowed to fall through the cracks. The kids who need the most help also get a lot of attention. We have a two-tiered system that caters to the very top and the ones struggling the most and sort of neglects a lot of people in the middle.


Are we talking public school? People at the top are absolutely not a focal point. They're being ignored to the point they’re allowing kids that are not as smart to think they're part of the "smart" group by osmosis and lowering the ceiling. This is what's bringing down public schools. It's a bizarro world where everyone has to be mediocre so that average and below average kids can be told they’re smart.

Our kids are bored out of their mind in school and they've always taken the hardest classes (enriched, honors, AP, DE), many with mediocre teachers and struggling classmates who shouldn't be there. If kids can't keep up with the pathetic curriculum in the internet age, maybe it's time for less finger pointing and more self-reflection.

I think too many people on this forum were not top students when they were kids nor did they associate with them. They don't know what it means. Somewhere along the line, they became parents and they now equivocate good grades or hrs studying with thinking their kids are really smart. Because that's how it used to be. Nowadays, the grades are inflated and the work is not as rigorous so studying shouldn't take that much time. A top student shouldn't struggle in high school level classes, and that includes the watered down AP classes

Maybe it’s time for you to be a good parent and put them in better schools. I was a top student at a known boarding school and so was DH. We both have kids who are doing much more than us and are experiencing rigorous schooling.

Sometimes, you, the parents, are the problem.


DP here. We can’t afford boarding school or even non-religious private school. It’s not about being a “better” parent. My kids have straight A’s in rigorous classes. So far the oldest has 4’s and 5’s on her AP tests. But each year I’d say they have 1-2 very good teachers, 1-2 serviceable teachers and 1-2 teachers where you wonder how in the h&ll this person is allowed to teach anyone anything. Waiting for the class schedule in August feels like Russian roulette.

You’re just describing public education…


DP. But it didn’t used to be like this. I was a public school kid. We had excellent teachers and they actually taught. I feel like teachers have lost both the ability to actually teach and the breadth of subject knowledge they used to have. My world history teacher in high school would lecture the whole class and get into character when talking about Alexander the Great and different major figures. He was so animated and knowledgeable- never did slides or read from notes (so you actually had to take your own). Same with my APUSH class, different teacher, equally great. My teens’ experiences have been nothing like that- even in their AP classes
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:In order to restore rigor, we need to return to pencil and paper. Laptops make it too easy to cheat, too distracting to focus and too hard to learn.


Maybe we should just revert to slate and chalk?

You are beyond ridiculous.


I think blue book exams should be restored. Too much cheating going on today.
Anonymous
Return to Blue Book exams in the classroom.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The kids at the top are being pushed too hard with the AP arms race and the expectation that everyone has to have. 1550+ SAT to get into a top school. The kids who are not at the very top are often ignored or allowed to fall through the cracks. The kids who need the most help also get a lot of attention. We have a two-tiered system that caters to the very top and the ones struggling the most and sort of neglects a lot of people in the middle.


Are we talking public school? People at the top are absolutely not a focal point. They're being ignored to the point they’re allowing kids that are not as smart to think they're part of the "smart" group by osmosis and lowering the ceiling. This is what's bringing down public schools. It's a bizarro world where everyone has to be mediocre so that average and below average kids can be told they’re smart.

Our kids are bored out of their mind in school and they've always taken the hardest classes (enriched, honors, AP, DE), many with mediocre teachers and struggling classmates who shouldn't be there. If kids can't keep up with the pathetic curriculum in the internet age, maybe it's time for less finger pointing and more self-reflection.

I think too many people on this forum were not top students when they were kids nor did they associate with them. They don't know what it means. Somewhere along the line, they became parents and they now equivocate good grades or hrs studying with thinking their kids are really smart. Because that's how it used to be. Nowadays, the grades are inflated and the work is not as rigorous so studying shouldn't take that much time. A top student shouldn't struggle in high school level classes, and that includes the watered down AP classes

Maybe it’s time for you to be a good parent and put them in better schools. I was a top student at a known boarding school and so was DH. We both have kids who are doing much more than us and are experiencing rigorous schooling.

Sometimes, you, the parents, are the problem.


DP here. We can’t afford boarding school or even non-religious private school. It’s not about being a “better” parent. My kids have straight A’s in rigorous classes. So far the oldest has 4’s and 5’s on her AP tests. But each year I’d say they have 1-2 very good teachers, 1-2 serviceable teachers and 1-2 teachers where you wonder how in the h&ll this person is allowed to teach anyone anything. Waiting for the class schedule in August feels like Russian roulette.

You’re just describing public education…


DP. But it didn’t used to be like this. I was a public school kid. We had excellent teachers and they actually taught. I feel like teachers have lost both the ability to actually teach and the breadth of subject knowledge they used to have. My world history teacher in high school would lecture the whole class and get into character when talking about Alexander the Great and different major figures. He was so animated and knowledgeable- never did slides or read from notes (so you actually had to take your own). Same with my APUSH class, different teacher, equally great. My teens’ experiences have been nothing like that- even in their AP classes


Teachers are often instructed NOT to lecture now. The way many teachers are evaluated would actually mark a teacher down for being the “sage on the stage.” We are now supposed to be the “guide on the side.”

I grew up in your era. My teachers lectured and I diligently took notes. I was engaged because it was clear they knew the content and they made it clear to me.

But now, teachers are given scripted lessons often written by companies far removed from the classroom. Admin observes to make sure students are actively engaged, which is often defined as participation in a group activity. That’s why you get gallery walks, cooperative projects, etc. If you “merely” lecture, you’re marked down.

We would benefit a lot from letting teachers teach again.
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: