I get that everyone wants the amount of effort THEIR kids put in to be the optimal amount of effort but that is not how competition works. The kid that works more has an advantage over the kid that works less. The purpose of the governor's schools is about advanced content. I generally agree that there is no need to provide an preference for kids that are taking algebra 2 because that really does encourage unnecessary and sometimes harmful acceleration. Almost nobody benefits from 2 years of post-calc math electives. But that doesn't mean we ignore academic achievement, we measure kids based on their ability not on what we think their ability might be if only they worked as hard as the other kids. If you want to use SOLs I would caution you that SOLs are even more subject to outside enrichment than standardized tests. You can learn how to take a standardized test in 6 to 8 sessions (whether you pay $300 or $3000 for those sessions, there is no secret sauce, standardized tests were "cracked" decades ago and the differences in test scores mostly measure differences in merit). The SOLs take more time and effort to prep (which ironically makes it more preppable) and do not have as many low cost or free resources available as something like the PSAT. Just based on what I have seen in the AAP process, allowing schools to "nominate" students will become problematic very quickly. We should not be picking kids because their parents are the PTA president. I think we can keep the 1.5% MS quota so we can compare "apples to apples" in terms of resources but pick the "best" 1.5% (it's just too random right now) and set an absolute floor for the PSAT at the 80th percentile or something. Because at some point we are not doing them any favors by putting them in TJ if they are too far behind. My impression is that almost half the students at TJ are getting at least 1 "C" in a core class every year. These are all students that could be pulling straight A's (or close to it) at their base school. TJ is not like Yale where once you get in, almost anyone can graduate with a decent GPA by avoiding the hard classes. It's more like MIT where kids that skated through school suddenly find themselves challenged. |
True, but many spent more like $20k on elite prep where their children were spoon fed actual test questions from a question bank that was compiled in violation of an NDA. |
hahahhahjahahjahahajaha |
The stupid part there is the NDA. Education doesn't care about NDA |
As a family who moved here from a place without math acceleration available - how does my student get placed out of algebra 2 [in geometry this year]? my kid has already done all the curriculum for geometry and wants to just move to algebra 2. how do we make it count (whether or not he gets into TJ)? |
There is no limit to how much effort you put into math without taking algebra 2 in 8th grade. |
Also nobody is spending $20K to prep for the TJ test. |
20k or 200k? Students trust prep effort, admissions want students who put in that prep effort, whether sports or academics. Notice the number of college admits on sports scholarships, especially the historically disadvantaged. By saying prep is bad, you are disingenuously discouraging the URMs from prepping to succeed at TJ. |
I know, and even if you're just memorizing the test answers, you're still learning! |
I don't think prep is bad at all. In fact, I'm all for it, but I don't think it should be the deciding factor for publicly-funded programs. |
High school sports are publicly funded programs |
WTF does sports have to do with academic programs? Oh wait…we know why you bring it up. Public schools should offer multi-level options (8th/freshman, JV, Varsity) for popular sports (and offer a few no-cut sports per season). There should be a path to varsity even for kids who didn’t start playing in K. |
But there isn't. The best players on the basketball team almost invariably have travel experience. |
But the path should be there for athletic kids who didn’t start in K. It’s high school, time for development and growth. |
These sports anecdotes are irrelevant. Personally, I don't think my taxes should even pay for sports. |