Do Michelle Obama and Beyonce advance Kamala at all?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Anonymous
Nope. Insanity is still insisting Trump won in 2020. Unless Dems did win that election against an insane man? |
Anonymous
LOL. Engaged?? How about just not very smart and need to be led to the polls and told how to vote. |
Anonymous
Well, the fact that there are low information voters clearly bothers you, but that doesn't change the fact that there are low information voters. Many millions of people are experienced voters and know exactly how to do it and many millions are really busy and are not actually that focused on the election. they are busy and being presented with easy to understand information about how to vote and when to vote can help get out the vote. That is the reality whether you like it or not. |
Anonymous
| Campaigns try to get out every vote they can. That goes for the Harris campaign that goes for the Trump campaign and that goes for every other campaign. If you're reading in DCUM political threads, you understand that. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Good luck getting these white boys to actually register and vote. Even if they do, it'll just replace the MAGATs that died because of COVID. Trump is at 47%. Nothing higher. |
Anonymous
WTF are you talking about? A baby is viable outside of the womb at around 22 weeks. If the mother is having medical complications in the third trimester (>24weeks) then labor is induced, she delivers a live baby and each receive the medical treatment they need. If a baby dies inside the mother, then labor is induced and she delivers a stillborn. That is not an abortion. If abnormalities that are severe are found in the third trimester, then the doctor decides when the appropriate delivery time is, the baby is delivered and it receives whatever medical treatment it needs based on the medical team’s recommendations, ethics, and parental rights There are zero reasons why a third trimester “abortion” is needed |
Anonymous
Yes. That is the Roe framework. This what Harris has clearly said she supports, which is codifying Roe. the "abortion until birth":crowd is talking about provisions for fetuses with health issues incompatible with life or life heath of the mother. not elective abortion after viability, which is about 22 weeks. This is what I support. It’s what most women support. So whats your problem with Jrris's stance on abortion? its the same as yoirs. That said, women and their doctors (and any involved partners and spouses, and their religious leader, if they choose). need to be making these tough decisions in the third trimester. Not politicians. Women should decide what is “terminal enough” for her or her baby warrant abortion. If the baby had a 1% chance of surviving a year vs a 5% of surviving a year, and what that year looks like (can the baby ever leave the hospital) and will the baby be in pain, and how much risk is there to the mother—is a 5% chance of the mother's death enough? how compromised is her health? what about mental illness? is severe schizophrenia that threatens her life and requires medicine that would kill a fetus to stabilize enough? These are not things we should legislate. Because none are the same. And everyone should want MDs and not JDs and/or politicians making this call. I developed pre-eclampsia at 28 weeks and went into pre-term labor. I had the option to deliver, but spent seven weeks, most of them in the hospital, on magnesium and other high powered meds, in Trandelinberg, to get my daughter to 35 weeks, when an amino said her lungs were developed enough that she likely would not have lifelong respiratory impairments. She still had several terrifying episodes in the first six month where she stopped breathing and turned blue and ended up in PICU. But, by the end of her first year, she was healthy. I’m glad I held on those 7 weeks. I’m so thankful for every everyday, and I'm glad I made the sacrifices needed to give her the best shot at a healthy life. But don’t think that I came though the experience "okay". The fear and trauma were enormous— and didn't stop when she was born and bouncing in and out of the PICU. So was the long term damage to my body. In the first year of her life, I had postpartum psychosis and tried to kill myself. I also had a hysterectomy and was unable to have the third child I wanted. She is now 20, and I am recovering from my 4th major surgery directly attributable to that pregnancy— or my decision to carry that pregnancy those extra weeks. thays right, 20 years later, my body has still not recovered. and long term im managing the chronic health issues associated with carrying hed past 28 weeks— they are nor amd cannot be cured. I knew the risk, I made the call, and I would do it again. But, no one can pretend it didn’t severely and permanently damage my body. Now, my daughter was generally healthy FETUS and 28 weeks when my pregnancy complications started, so if I hadn't carried the pregnancy ant further, she would have been delivered and we would have moved heaven and earth to get her healthy. But if my complications started at weeks 19-20? And if she also had abnormalities that decreased her chances of surviving or being generally healthy? The decision on whether to abort would have been hard. IDK what I would have done. Because I literally would have died if I had carried her a fews days longer than I did. I was out of runway when she was born. Would I have undertaken this level of harm to my health and ruined my chances for another baby to get a fetus to 25-26 weeks, when there would have been a high risk that she would have died and if she had survived, it she likely would have had life long complications? I don't know. but I do know the discussion should have been between my doctor, my husband and myself. And should not include politicians. Because that’s what abortion ay 20 weeks looks like. A wanted child. A mother who went to all the appointments and slept on her right side and stopped eating fish and didn’t drink a drop or take as much a Tylenol— and a situation where all the choices are bad. And all the potential outcomes are awful. |
Anonymous
It’s early voting. I went to the Fairfax Government Center with my bookclub to vote. What’s your issue here? |
Anonymous
Link please? |
Anonymous
|
This is the democrats party in a moment.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14006785/Kamala-Harris-democrat-event-screamed-child.html |
Anonymous
Ok, if “no one is doing it”, then there should be ZERO electoral consequences for banning it. Explain why I’m wrong for thinking this, please? You say “but no one is having late term abortions unless they are medically necessary”… Ok, I’ll take your word for that. Then why would banning late term abortions that are NOT medically necessary be something that costs votes? I don’t understand this. If no one does it, then it literally affects NO ONE. So why would cost votes? Please explain. |