Will Trump drop Vance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone said JD looks like a Duggar and I can’t unsee it.

Like the pedo son.

So calling a look alike to a pedo son is acceptable dialogue?

JD is the one who wrote he thought he was gay. And he’s the one who didn’t write about a single ex girlfriend from age 15 to 25. First girlfriend is a law classmate he met in his mid 20 and then he married? And he chose to seek out a notoriously degenerate gay billionaire to mentor him? It’s all very sus, as the kids say.

Again, being gay is one thing. He can be gay if he wants.

But calling someone a pedophile on this board is just as bad as calling Kamala a slut who slept with married men..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This post is a waste of space.

No, he will not drop him. The DCUM world here are delusional.

Probably not. But he may regret his choice. McCain did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This post is a waste of space.

No, he will not drop him. The DCUM world here are delusional.

To be clear, Democrats don’t want him to drop Vance. It’s just speculation based on Trump’s inherent impulsiveness and his poor choice here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone said JD looks like a Duggar and I can’t unsee it.

Like the pedo son.

So calling a look alike to a pedo son is acceptable dialogue?

JD is the one who wrote he thought he was gay. And he’s the one who didn’t write about a single ex girlfriend from age 15 to 25. First girlfriend is a law classmate he met in his mid 20 and then he married? And he chose to seek out a notoriously degenerate gay billionaire to mentor him? It’s all very sus, as the kids say.

Again, being gay is one thing. He can be gay if he wants.

But calling someone a pedophile on this board is just as bad as calling Kamala a slut who slept with married men..

No one is calling JD Vance a pedophile. They're saying he physically resembles that Duggar kid. It's trashy and frankly I think he looks freaky enough on his own without drawing the comparison, but no one is calling him a pedo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This post is a waste of space.

No, he will not drop him. The DCUM world here are delusional.

To be clear, Democrats don’t want him to drop Vance. It’s just speculation based on Trump’s inherent impulsiveness and his poor choice here.

A lot of Republicans want it though!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone said JD looks like a Duggar and I can’t unsee it.

Like the pedo son.

So calling a look alike to a pedo son is acceptable dialogue?

JD is the one who wrote he thought he was gay. And he’s the one who didn’t write about a single ex girlfriend from age 15 to 25. First girlfriend is a law classmate he met in his mid 20 and then he married? And he chose to seek out a notoriously degenerate gay billionaire to mentor him? It’s all very sus, as the kids say.

Again, being gay is one thing. He can be gay if he wants.

But calling someone a pedophile on this board is just as bad as calling Kamala a slut who slept with married men..

Are you low IQ?

[Anonymous]

Let's steer clear of irrelevant comparisons, OK?

It's not relevant to mention that any candidate running for office looks like a pedo guy, or that they might be gay because they didn't have many girlfriends, or that any of them slept to the top, or anything like that.

The truth is, Vance is not ready for Prime time. Just like Harris wasn't ready for Prime time in 2020. Now she is. Trump was his own crass energetic self in 2016, and now he's in physical and mental decline.

So Harris is well-positioned in terms of debate/speech/presentation, and this might compensate for the obvious racist and misogynist barriers that she faces. Especially if she picks a VP who is more attuned to his audience than Vance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing, Trump is only capable of making huge mistakes. His main criteria for picking Vance was that he had chemistry with him, felt idolized by him, and therefore liked him. Most normal people would fail the Trump chemistry test.

Trump is the problem. Can his party drop him?

Just give that orange head a pacifier already and let him sleep holding a large bag of potato chips. Please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Let's steer clear of irrelevant comparisons, OK?

It's not relevant to mention that any candidate running for office looks like a pedo guy, or that they might be gay because they didn't have many girlfriends, or that any of them slept to the top, or anything like that.

The truth is, Vance is not ready for Prime time. Just like Harris wasn't ready for Prime time in 2020. Now she is. Trump was his own crass energetic self in 2016, and now he's in physical and mental decline.

So Harris is well-positioned in terms of debate/speech/presentation, and this might compensate for the obvious racist and misogynist barriers that she faces. Especially if she picks a VP who is more attuned to his audience than Vance.

He's also repellent to the party's biggest donor base: the financial industry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump campaign support is imploding... Elon Musk has backed out of his pledge to give Trump campaign $45 million a month

https://fortune.com/2024/07/23/elon-musk-backs-down-from-45-million-a-month-pledge-to-trump-says-he-doesnt-subscribe-to-cult-of-personality/

LOL good times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Also the oldest failson liked him the best.

That's hilarious. Thanks for the new word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

Talk about made-up nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

Citations?

“Trump campaign officials acknowledged that Trump selected the inexperienced Vance, charged with all his techno-authoritarian ideas, to boost support among their own base, not extend a hand to swing voters, according to The Atlantic. Vance was a symbol of the Trump team’s assuredness that they would win in 2024. Come Sunday, that assuredness appears to be shrinking.”
https://newrepublic.com/post/184106/trump-picking-jd-vance-mistake-biden-kamala-harris

And this is the Atlantic article referenced
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/trump-campaign-biden-dropping-out/679183/

new republic is not a credible source. The Atlantic link has a paywall.

Besides, nothing in the new republic article mentions anything you are claiming. You are spreading disinformation.

“Most striking thing I heard from Trump allies yesterday was the second-guessing of JD Vance—a selection, they acknowledged, that was [born] of cockiness, meant to run up margins with the base in a blowout rather than persuade swing voters in a nail-biter,” Atlantic staff writer Tim Alberta, who had written the piece about the panicking Trump campaign, posted on X (formerly Twitter).

Who? Names? Who are the Trump “allies” being used as sources? First the author claims he heard from the trump campaign, then Trump allies. But all sources are completely anonymous.

There may be more information behind the paywall, but new republic has nothing so meh, neither does The Atlantic. Nice try.

Tim Alberta is a respected political journalist. I know you’re panicking but don’t blame the messenger.

Who are his sources?

He’s published extensive interviews with Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita recently.

Trump campaign adviser Chris LaCivita said Trump's running mate J.D. Vance is “going to be everywhere” ahead of the election.

Speaking at an event hosted by Brunswick and Georgetown University, LaCivita said the populist Ohioan is “a person we can plug in really anywhere” and will "attract a wider coalition of voters to Trump than we had before.” He cited Vance’s appeal to young and working-class voters.

“We're actually redefining I think the Republican Party in a lot of different ways,” he said, noting Trump’s appeal to the working class.

“That's clearly an issue that bothers the left but it's one we feel passionate about. And quite frankly it's a place where we should have been for a long time.”
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/16/rnc-live-updates-coverage/get-ready-for-vance-00168709

How would Vance appeal to young voters? He looks old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There have been a bunch of articles including conservative leaning ones that Vance was a huge mistake. Can the Republicans drop him even though they have finished the convention and formal nomination.

Talk about made-up nonsense.

The GOP's biggest source of campaign contributions is furious with Trump about this. They're going to sit on their hands and that's going to hurt Trump AND all the other down-ballot races that desperately need Wall Street's money.

[Anonymous]