Biden planning changes to the Supreme Court

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:81 year old Biden running for another term after spending 50 years in government calling for term limits.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Sad but true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President Biden is finalizing plans to endorse major changes to the Supreme Court in the coming weeks, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code

A welcome move. Changes to the Supreme Court are overdue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/16/biden-supreme-court-reforms/

What happened to judges serve for life, in the Constitution?

Average lifespan when Constitution was written was 45.

!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are just mad that the Court isn't adopting their policy positions any more.

Liberals are made that the supreme court has been bought by billionaires and abandoned their "settled law" and even conservative doctrine to determine that a president is above the law and that the federal government can no longer write and enforce rules that protect the public so as to have clean air, clean water and safe working conditions.

That never happened. Again it is liberals unhappy with not getting their way, not having a Supreme Court that ignores the Constitution to implement their preferred policies.

Yep.
Biden is going to have a hell of a time passing a Constitutional amendment as a lame duck in less than 6 months. LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Term limits and ethics enforcement. I’m a fan.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/29/biden-supreme-court-reform-ethics-code-term-limits/

Me too. These are common sense reforms that bring more ethics and accountability to the Supreme Court toward restoring the public's trust, faith and confidence in them - which is currently at rock-bottom levels.

+1
The ethics thing first and foremost. Clearly the Republicans on the court are on the take.

[Anonymous]

Never will happen.

Back to the basement, Joe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never will happen.

Back to the basement, Joe.

Because the GOP prefers to hvae a totally corrupted court.

And then they wonder why the Dems are coming on strong for the November elections.

[Anonymous]

Who thinks a constitutional amendment will happen in the next six months?

Only weirdos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never will happen.

Back to the basement, Joe.

Because the GOP prefers to hvae a totally corrupted court.

And then they wonder why the Dems are coming on strong for the November elections.

"Totally corrupt court" = You didn't get the decisions you want.

Suggest you READ the decisions, not just take the media headline and some journalist's take on rulings.



Also term limits for SCOTUS oushed by a President. Well, that violates Article III, section 1.

Article III
Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

That bolded part means no term limits. Got it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:81 year old Biden running for another term after spending 50 years in government calling for term limits.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Sad but true

But Biden had to be elected many times in that time. Voters had the ability to say no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks a constitutional amendment will happen in the next six months?

Only weirdos.

Bravo!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never will happen.

Back to the basement, Joe.

Because the GOP prefers to hvae a totally corrupted court.

And then they wonder why the Dems are coming on strong for the November elections.

"Totally corrupt court" = You didn't get the decisions you want.

Suggest you READ the decisions, not just take the media headline and some journalist's take on rulings.



Also term limits for SCOTUS oushed by a President. Well, that violates Article III, section 1.

Article III
Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

That bolded part means no term limits. Got it?

Clarence Thomas has violated any semblance of good behavior and per Article III is unfit to serve.

And you missed the part where Biden wants to propose this as a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT - as in changing what the Constitution says, making your "he can't because the Constitution says x" argument moot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberals are just mad that the Court isn't adopting their policy positions any more.

Liberals are made that the supreme court has been bought by billionaires and abandoned their "settled law" and even conservative doctrine to determine that a president is above the law and that the federal government can no longer write and enforce rules that protect the public so as to have clean air, clean water and safe working conditions.

That never happened. Again it is liberals unhappy with not getting their way, not having a Supreme Court that ignores the Constitution to implement their preferred policies.

It's not about "not getting their way" - it's about a Supreme Court that was corrupted by nominees who LIED during their confirmation hearings and then throwing stare decisis out the window and overturning what had been settled law for decades. Oh, and accepting millions in bribes, refusing to recuse in the face of serious conflicts of interest, and so very much more. This is certainly the most corrupt and unethical Supreme Court of my lifetime, and perhaps one of the most corrupt in American history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never will happen.

Back to the basement, Joe.

Because the GOP prefers to hvae a totally corrupted court.

And then they wonder why the Dems are coming on strong for the November elections.

"Totally corrupt court" = You didn't get the decisions you want.

Suggest you READ the decisions, not just take the media headline and some journalist's take on rulings.



Also term limits for SCOTUS oushed by a President. Well, that violates Article III, section 1.

Article III
Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

That bolded part means no term limits. Got it?

Clarence Thomas has violated any semblance of good behavior and per Article III is unfit to serve.

And you missed the part where Biden wants to propose this as a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT - as in changing what the Constitution says, making your "he can't because the Constitution says x" argument moot.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/warren-the-supreme-court-is-on-the-ballot-in-november/vi-BB1qLV3F

[Anonymous]

THANK GOD.
Now age limits for Senators and Presidents please!!

[Anonymous]

So, since presidents are now KINGS!! (thanks SC), Biden can just demand they all be replaced by whomever he wants as an official act adn then jam through executive orders saying those people can be replaced in X years.