Biden planning changes to the Supreme Court

[Anonymous]

Laying out a vision for reform does not mean he expects this to happen within 6 months.

Running on an ethical and independent Supreme Court is hard to argue with.

It is not about stacking the court, it is about making the court reflect elected leaders in a non random fashion that does not depend on the judges’ willingness to retire.

Let the voters speak through their votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Laying out a vision for reform does not mean he expects this to happen within 6 months.

Running on an ethical and independent Supreme Court is hard to argue with.

It is not about stacking the court, it is about making the court reflect elected leaders in a non random fashion that does not depend on the judges’ willingness to retire.

Let the voters speak through their votes.

You know who is weird enough to argue against an ethical and independent Supreme Court?

MAGA-nuts!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This smacks of desperation. The final flailing of a man who needs to go, who knows his time is at an end but isn't quite ready to admit it yet.

You don’t think ethics reforms are needed?

I don't think this is the time or way to do it.

This made me laugh so hard. It’s never the “right time” for you guys.

[Anonymous]

Biden does not go far enough. All the judges should be replace by AI.

[Anonymous]

I disagree about the priorities here. We need better representation. Expand the House.

[Anonymous]

Thank goodness, leave us with some parting gifts, Joe. It’s crazy think the US Supreme Court can “self-regulate” themselves. Uh, no try agin. We have to place some guardrails with regards to ethics - no kings allowed. Not even in the US Supreme Court

[Anonymous]

There is a CNN article that is talking about how dysfunctional SCOTUS is

Unfortunately, Roberts has been a poor leader and his court will not be well regarded. Clearly very partisan, the article exposed that all their posturing about interpreting the law is BS and there is all sorts of political maneuvering that happens before the decisions are released publicly.

It was an eye-opening read and apparently CNN has more.

Alito leaking the Dobbs decision and the corruption between him and Thomas is just the tip of the iceberg unfortunately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President Biden is finalizing plans to endorse major changes to the Supreme Court in the coming weeks, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code

A welcome move. Changes to the Supreme Court are overdue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/16/biden-supreme-court-reforms/

What happened to judges serve for life, in the Constitution?

Average lifespan when Constitution was written was 45.

!

If you lived past 5y, you were likely to live much longer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This smacks of desperation. The final flailing of a man who needs to go, who knows his time is at an end but isn't quite ready to admit it yet.

He did admit it; he isn’t running for reelection.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laying out a vision for reform does not mean he expects this to happen within 6 months.

Running on an ethical and independent Supreme Court is hard to argue with.

It is not about stacking the court, it is about making the court reflect elected leaders in a non random fashion that does not depend on the judges’ willingness to retire.

Let the voters speak through their votes.

You know who is weird enough to argue against an ethical and independent Supreme Court?

MAGA-nuts!

Yeah, and when will Congress outlaw insider trading that has made its members so wealthy (see e.g., Nancy Pelosi).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:President Biden is finalizing plans to endorse major changes to the Supreme Court in the coming weeks, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code

A welcome move. Changes to the Supreme Court are overdue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/16/biden-supreme-court-reforms/

What happened to judges serve for life, in the Constitution?

Average lifespan when Constitution was written was 45.

!

Stating things like this just emphasizes the fact that you have no idea what "life expectancy" means. Go back to your googler and leaarn a learn a little about what you think you are about to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laying out a vision for reform does not mean he expects this to happen within 6 months.

Running on an ethical and independent Supreme Court is hard to argue with.

It is not about stacking the court, it is about making the court reflect elected leaders in a non random fashion that does not depend on the judges’ willingness to retire.

Let the voters speak through their votes.

You know who is weird enough to argue against an ethical and independent Supreme Court?

MAGA-nuts!

Yeah, and when will Congress outlaw insider trading that has made its members so wealthy (see e.g., Nancy Pelosi).

If you are so adamant about rooting out corruption, why did your peeps crush this subpoena?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a CNN article that is talking about how dysfunctional SCOTUS is

Unfortunately, Roberts has been a poor leader and his court will not be well regarded. Clearly very partisan, the article exposed that all their posturing about interpreting the law is BS and there is all sorts of political maneuvering that happens before the decisions are released publicly.

It was an eye-opening read and apparently CNN has more.

Alito leaking the Dobbs decision and the corruption between him and Thomas is just the tip of the iceberg unfortunately.

Alito leaked the Dobbs decision??? You lefties are unhinged and stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laying out a vision for reform does not mean he expects this to happen within 6 months.

Running on an ethical and independent Supreme Court is hard to argue with.

It is not about stacking the court, it is about making the court reflect elected leaders in a non random fashion that does not depend on the judges’ willingness to retire.

Let the voters speak through their votes.

You know who is weird enough to argue against an ethical and independent Supreme Court?

MAGA-nuts!

Yeah, and when will Congress outlaw insider trading that has made its members so wealthy (see e.g., Nancy Pelosi).

If you are so adamant about rooting out corruption, why did your peeps crush this subpoena?

Ooooh. Dayum!!! You got me! Jared Kushner subpoena quashed vs Congress’ insider trading for decades.