The delusion in these posts is mostly coming from middle aged women. That group at 25+ BMI is virtually always (like 95%, minimum) on the wrong side of body fat to muscle ratio. That’s just the reality of our species. One that’s easily objectively measured. But when you have an objective measure where people don’t like the results, the answer is always to attack the measurement. |
But don’t forget they’re muscular tanks while simultaneously being “skinny AF” as this poster’s D1 offensive lineman (?) is, according to her previous post. Good rule of thumb: anyone so muscular that BMI mis-categorizes them as overweight despite extremely low body fat will NEVER be mistaken for “skinny”. These are mutually exclusive. |
Someone’s diet pill amphetamines are making them very angry… |
Today's popular kids are as thin as the popular kids pictured in the photos. The out group from either era isn't as thin or beautiful. |
Being tan isn’t a virtue. It’s just a sign of sun damage. |
What does being popular have to do with anything? In any case, that’s a ridiculous generalization. |
Seriously! Imagine getting up in the morning and trolling the alleged "fats" on an anon board. Look at skinyrage PP, everyone! So pretty! So smart! ![]() |
Popularity is largely a beauty contest, and thin wins. Gross, but true. |
But this kind of "unhealthy" is praised in our culture. Being overweight is unhealthy, but being tan is a sign of good health (even though it's been linked to cancers and health risks far more directly than being overweight). |
Again, research shows BMI 26-27 is the healthiest. Sorry you don’t like that. |
DP. But what research says that? I find that very hard to believe. I don’t pay any attention to my bmi, but I’m well aware that 25+ extra pounds is hard on any body. |
read the thread - it has been posted repeatedly. an extra 25lbs on older women is much healthier than being skinny. skinny and older is not a healthy combo. |
That study is from 2013. I’m sure if I spent time on it, I could find something supporting the opposite. Science doesn’t work where by finding something that confirmation bias supports your lifestyle choice and then you stop looking. For example, how does a BMI of 26-27 possibly square with the idea that VO2Max is the best indicator of longevity when the bottom number of that calculation is weight? It can’t. Because it’s effectively physically impossible to do sufficient steady state cardio exercise to continue training the cardio part of that metric while also managing to carry around all that extra weight - the weight would come off, unless the person has a bad cheesecake and ice cream habit. |
You mean the shape.com article that explicitly stated that the results were due to medical advances, not that being 25 pounds overweight is somehow now “healthy”? Seems like someone struggled to read the article, and it was me. |
DP I think it's disordered that people want to push the fat agenda to make themselves feel better about being fat. Whatever floats your boat. Guidelines and numbers published by medical organizations are not made up. Your pop science and advice from whatever magazine you pulled from the gutter is made up. |