Divorced dad looking for a wealthy woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:TBH you sound fine but are probably not going to be able to attract such a woman….if you don’t make a lot of $ they are going to want someone with some level of prestige or influence (local celebrity type, probably). Most will not want to deal with your kids either- whether they have their own or not.

This. An attractive, wealthy woman is not going to settle for a man who makes $120k AND has kids. You're time and attention is divided and you can't carry your own weight. That's just a nonstarter.

Yeah, you might actually need to bring something else to the table, like a personality. [/quote

No "personality" makes up for having two kids and a $120k salary. Hard no. I would be open to dating someone without kids who made that salary in his forties and had a great personality.

[Anonymous]

I know several men who were quite deliberate and intentional in their quest to marry for money who were very successful in doing so.

You can do it OP! I will share that the one commonality they all had was the gift of “rizz” so it may be a more challenging endeavor if you are lacking in that aspect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When a woman does not need a man's money to have a wide range of experiences, most men will not be able to meet her needs. At that level of wealth women may have criteria such as good sex(which most men are terrible at) etc...

Yes, good in bed, great body, educated, well-read and tall are the major criteria for me when dating.

what would be your starting height? Does penis size matter as well? Cut or uncut?

Talk is mostly a proxy/polite way of saying penis size. Yes it does matter especially if the woman has already had kids.

[Anonymous]

What do you consider high-earning for a woman OP? How much do you consider wealthy?

You realize that she will not merge assets with you right? So you’ll be out in the cold if the relationship fizzles.

[Anonymous]

I’m a 41 year old woman and I would turn you down with only what you’ve written.

A lot of men assume that they have to pay for a partner. I don’t want a relationship like that. My money is my money. I’m not combining or sharing finances with a new man this late in life.

That’s just me. Maybe you’ll find someone who doesn’t think like I do. Who knows?

[Anonymous]

There are a few men who we know who married for money and they look pretty miserable to me.

It is one thing to marry for love and spouse has money.

[Anonymous]

OP, why not work on making more money and raising your kids for now? Given your salary and situation, your criteria for dating should be to date women who don't expect you to pay for them. Much better to make, have, and control your own money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:None of my divorced financially successful girlfriends are interested in remarrying, especially to a guy with kids and a boring job. Sorry, you don't bring much to the table.

Agree with this. Unless OP is a knockout, charming, and fun to be around. And excellent in bed. The kind of guy who has women throwing themselves at him. But a divorced economist with two kids? No thanks.

[Anonymous]

“Economist” is the red flag for me. Linear thinking and the “science” is based on fairy tales.

Maybe if you’d qualified that somehow, I’d be able to get past it.

[Anonymous]

Damn women are really harsh lol....Why can't men be harsh and cold like them lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Economist” is the red flag for me. Linear thinking and the “science” is based on fairy tales.

Maybe if you’d qualified that somehow, I’d be able to get past it.

You are obviously an Imbecile based on your definition of "Economist"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Damn women are really harsh lol....Why can't men be harsh and cold like them lol

are you kidding? Men are harsh and cold when it comes age and body type.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Damn women are really harsh lol....Why can't men be harsh and cold like them lol

Because since the dawn of time, women have had more access to willing sexual partners than men have had. It really is that simple. That’s not changing and always has been true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Economist” is the red flag for me. Linear thinking and the “science” is based on fairy tales.

Maybe if you’d qualified that somehow, I’d be able to get past it.

You are obviously an Imbecile based on your definition of "Economist"

I rest my case. 🤷‍♀️

[Anonymous]

The 2 kids are a deal breaker, sorry. Nobody wants to be a stepmother, blended families are a PITA. I think it will be easier when the kids are out of the house AND financially independent.