Divorced dad looking for a wealthy woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

currently in my 40s. I'm probably a 7 on attraction scale, make close to 400k, and ... most "regular" men would avoid me backing off after a few weeks, realizing my lifestyle ... . ... one man I was dating had an experience of dating a younger woman.

Most attractive men will not court you for weeks nor tolerate your pretentious bragging about Clyde's 1789 restaurant. These men will just stack a bunch young women on Tinder dates and then "back off" you, and onto those young women. It sounds like your juice is not worth the squeeze.

1789 Clyde's is incomparably better than local Chipotle where you take your Tinder dolls so go with that. Matching spending habits and lifestyle are crucial for long term relationship unless one partner expects the other one bank all expenses. I won't do it for any man, but I will be an equitable partner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"regular" men would avoid me backing off after a few weeks, realizing my lifestyle. Only "execs" would stick as men don't want to date a woman who regularly lunches with her girlfriends at 1789.

1789 Clyde's is incomparably better than local Chipotle where you take your Tinder dolls.

You don't need to be an "executive" to afford Clydes!

I took my Tinder dates to dive bars and then back to my place. They were not there for the food.

Men do not "back off" because they are intimidated by your lifestyle. They avoid you because you are not having sex with them, or because the sex is bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

What on earth are you talking about? She isn’t retired so she isn’t depleting anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

What on earth are you talking about? She isn’t retired so she isn’t depleting anything.

Oh great so she lives in a $3mm mansion making 250k . Super smart

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"regular" men would avoid me backing off after a few weeks, realizing my lifestyle. Only "execs" would stick as men don't want to date a woman who regularly lunches with her girlfriends at 1789.

1789 Clyde's is incomparably better than local Chipotle where you take your Tinder dolls.

You don't need to be an "executive" to afford Clydes!

I took my Tinder dates to dive bars and then back to my place. They were not there for the food.

Men do not "back off" because they are intimidated by your lifestyle. They avoid you because you are not having sex with them, or because the sex is bad.

Ah you are the type that I avoid: needs to sleep with 10 to like 1 woman. Of course I slept with the men I dated but on my own time and will, and when there was a connection. There were not many, but I get my pick of nice men, so I’m all good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"regular" men would avoid me backing off after a few weeks, realizing my lifestyle. Only "execs" would stick.

I slept with the men I dated ... when there was a connection.

So after a few weeks, your sleeping partners would often avoid you because they were intimidated by Clyde's?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"regular" men would avoid me backing off after a few weeks, realizing my lifestyle. Only "execs" would stick.

I slept with the men I dated ... when there was a connection.

So after a few weeks, your sleeping partners would often avoid you because they were intimidated by Clyde's?

You are dumb, bro. I don’t sleep with people who have difference lifestyles. Not ever arguing over paying for a housekeeper out of my own money- been there, done that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

What on earth are you talking about? She isn’t retired so she isn’t depleting anything.

Oh great so she lives in a $3mm mansion making 250k . Super smart

Are you a troll? It doesn’t say that. She said $250K salary with $3M assets. Assets doesn’t mean just equity it’s a combo of equity and retirement and wherever else. You don’t know the allocation. Maybe she lives in a $100K condo for all you know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

What on earth are you talking about? She isn’t retired so she isn’t depleting anything.

Oh great so she lives in a $3mm mansion making 250k . Super smart

Are you a troll? It doesn’t say that. She said $250K salary with $3M assets. Assets doesn’t mean just equity it’s a combo of equity and retirement and wherever else. You don’t know the allocation. Maybe she lives in a $100K condo for all you know.

She says she was making 250k (presumably employment income) plus $3mm assets. The question is why she’s not counting income from assets towards her gross income? People with that NW usually have brokerage accounts, rentals, investments - not just a huge retirement plan or a huge house.

[Anonymous]

Go for it. Just know that since the vast majority of women have ZERO interest in paying for a man youre probably gonna have to date way up. WAY UP. So be open to women 15+ years older than you and you'll be golden

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

What on earth are you talking about? She isn’t retired so she isn’t depleting anything.

Oh great so she lives in a $3mm mansion making 250k . Super smart

Are you a troll? It doesn’t say that. She said $250K salary with $3M assets. Assets doesn’t mean just equity it’s a combo of equity and retirement and wherever else. You don’t know the allocation. Maybe she lives in a $100K condo for all you know.

She says she was making 250k (presumably employment income) plus $3mm assets. The question is why she’s not counting income from assets towards her gross income? People with that NW usually have brokerage accounts, rentals, investments - not just a huge retirement plan or a huge house.

Presumably because she is letting it compound instead of living off of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a 50yo divorced mom who makes $240K and has $3M NW and I thought I was doing okay until this thread.

You should be making twice from what you stated if your assets are well-managed

? How does earned income have anything to do with how assets are managed?

Assets/NW should be generating at least 7% annual return or sheds basically depleting them and her earned income. So if 240k is earned, she should be making also about same in unearned income

What on earth are you talking about? She isn’t retired so she isn’t depleting anything.

Oh great so she lives in a $3mm mansion making 250k . Super smart

Are you a troll? It doesn’t say that. She said $250K salary with $3M assets. Assets doesn’t mean just equity it’s a combo of equity and retirement and wherever else. You don’t know the allocation. Maybe she lives in a $100K condo for all you know.

She says she was making 250k (presumably employment income) plus $3mm assets. The question is why she’s not counting income from assets towards her gross income? People with that NW usually have brokerage accounts, rentals, investments - not just a huge retirement plan or a huge house.

Presumably because she is letting it compound instead of living off of it.

Hopefully

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm probably a 7 on attraction scale ... most "regular" men would avoid me backing off after a few weeks, ... one man I was dating had an experience of dating a younger woman.

Anonymous wrote:Clyde's is incomparably better than local Chipotle where you take your Tinder dolls.

You had "connections" with "executives" who shared their "lifestyle". But they didn't feel that connection, and chose to share their lifestyles with younger "Tinder dolls". Men are as loyal as their options, and you were only 3 Tinder dolls away from being dumped.