Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:$400m and she gets a $1m property settlement (.25%) is spite. It’s a terrible offer to a woman you’ve been with for 25 years and had 3 children with. Much of his estate was built over the course of their married life. A reasonable, non evil person would’ve quietly given her a minimum of $10m (still less than 5%) and avoided all the negative publicity.

She deserves what she agreed to in the prenup.

A reasonable person honors that agreement and doesn’t ask for more.

PP didn't use the word "deserve". The point is that a man with a $400m estate should settle this matter with his partner of 25 years, mother of his 3 children, privately for a conscionable amount. $1m of $400m after an 18 year marriage and 3 kids is unconscionable.

He did. They documented it and signed it.

Paying women to be mothers is a disgusting idea.

She got more of his money when they were partners. He gave her the greatest gift in the world 3 children and she never had to work and probably had Nannie’s. They have the best life/education/ etc

Marriage is not a profitable job the idea that women are paid to be wives and mothers is unconscionable.

19/25 amazing years.

Paying her more after the divorce is terrible practice.

It’s the “Nannie’s” poster again. Has it out for women who can afford nannies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also it is the SAHM who watch his movies. I just do not think I can watch him anymore. He should settle with an appropriate amount of money for a long term marriage FYI if they were just married five years and no kids the. yes the prenup makes sense but that prenup and the philosophy around it has long since expired. He is ruthless and maybe this is why she is divorcing him.

+1

Exactly! The more he reveals himself the sorrier I’m feeling for his kids. And listen, I’m no fan of hers - she sounds plastic pre-surgery and the disgusting conspicuous consumption lifestyle they both admit to is stomach turning.

What has me angry is his obvious disregard for his kids’ feelings; demanding to tell them about the divorce via Zoom video call 10 minutes duration rather than wait to do it in person with their mom present also, he’s controlling and vindictive and at 68 years of age has still not learned to put his children first.

I bet Cindy is watching all this and just grateful she got out when she did. I bet his adult kids are watching all this and having ALL kinds of feelings.

Kevin Costner is revealing himself to be a narcissist and a bad father, period. He is also apparently so malignantly narcissistic that he isn’t comprehending the damage he is doing to his brand. Horizon is going to fail, mark my words - you heard it here first.

Yeah he's showing he's got a little more John Dutton in him than anyone thought. And while that might be fine for the TV show, IRL I would think John Dutton was an abusive ahole.

Cindy was smart to divorce this cheater while she still had her youth and her pride. We’re big fans of the series and the prequels but they will go on without Costner just fine. Do I think less of him? Yes. Does it affect my viewership? Not of Yellowstone but I probably won’t watch any more of his films and tv where he is a leading man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:$400m and she gets a $1m property settlement (.25%) is spite. It’s a terrible offer to a woman you’ve been with for 25 years and had 3 children with. Much of his estate was built over the course of their married life. A reasonable, non evil person would’ve quietly given her a minimum of $10m (still less than 5%) and avoided all the negative publicity.

She deserves what she agreed to in the prenup.

A reasonable person honors that agreement and doesn’t ask for more.

PP didn't use the word "deserve". The point is that a man with a $400m estate should settle this matter with his partner of 25 years, mother of his 3 children, privately for a conscionable amount. $1m of $400m after an 18 year marriage and 3 kids is unconscionable.

He did. They documented it and signed it.

Paying women to be mothers is a disgusting idea.

She got more of his money when they were partners. He gave her the greatest gift in the world 3 children and she never had to work and probably had Nannie’s. They have the best life/education/ etc

Marriage is not a profitable job the idea that women are paid to be wives and mothers is unconscionable.

19/25 amazing years.

Paying her more after the divorce is terrible practice.

Obviously she left for cause - the economics and risk of leaving with that prenup are as bad as I've ever read about. And people of such substantial means regularly transfer money to their partners when they leave, even gay couples who never had kids together often take care of the person they spent a significant part of their life with. And in this case, they built a life together that doesn't work without her staying home with the kids. He reportedly left for 4 months a time to film movies and tv series, and she stayed home with the kids. Even if they had nannies, no person with a conscious leaves their kids home with only nannies for 4 months at a time. I get that leaving half of all marital property to a partner who never worked no longer holds up, but this case is extreme. He should settle and the settlement should include a meaningful property settlement to allow her to live comfortably.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also it is the SAHM who watch his movies. I just do not think I can watch him anymore. He should settle with an appropriate amount of money for a long term marriage FYI if they were just married five years and no kids the. yes the prenup makes sense but that prenup and the philosophy around it has long since expired. He is ruthless and maybe this is why she is divorcing him.

LOL. Looks like the conniving gold digger herself is posting here. His fans are flyover moms and dads who can spot a conniving gold digger from a mile away. To them, this ex sounds like an extortionist turning her nose up as $1 million cash PLUS child support PLUS any and all expenses for the kids. Most of his fans will never see a million dollars.

Why don’t you ask Jeff to check if there is one new poster responding. Sorry to disappoint you that it is just normal DCUMers that are posting on this thread. He’s making himself look like a jackass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m still team KC, but do wish they’d handle divorce more discreetly. I think they are both posturing and putting out messaging to damage the other, when ultimately, it will only hurt the kids.

After 18 years, wish she hadn’t blindsided him with divorce. That seems unfair. I guess I can understand why he wanted to relay the divorce to the kids himself, even if he only had a small window to do it. He did agree to up her housing allowance over $1M but her request for $248k/mo is absurd.

He was planning to divorce her—she just beat him to the punch. He also failed his fans by dropping out of Yellowstone early. Sounds like he’s in a selfish phase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also it is the SAHM who watch his movies. I just do not think I can watch him anymore. He should settle with an appropriate amount of money for a long term marriage FYI if they were just married five years and no kids the. yes the prenup makes sense but that prenup and the philosophy around it has long since expired. He is ruthless and maybe this is why she is divorcing him.

LOL. Looks like the conniving gold digger herself is posting here. His fans are flyover moms and dads who can spot a conniving gold digger from a mile away. To them, this ex sounds like an extortionist turning her nose up as $1 million cash PLUS child support PLUS any and all expenses for the kids. Most of his fans will never see a million dollars.

Why don’t you ask Jeff to check if there is one new poster responding. Sorry to disappoint you that it is just normal DCUMers that are posting on this thread. He’s making himself look like a jackass.

+1 from someone who has been passively following and was accused of posting rumors 'over and over' earlier in this thread.

I don't think I thought much of anything about KC other than enjoying yellowstone and waterworld before this post

[Anonymous]

Seems strategic to me on her part that she did this when her kids were older but not yet out of the house. With no kids to house, she'd have zero argument for maintaining the lavish lifestyle. But she had to know she was on thin ground so waited a good long while to try to get out. She doesn't have much of an argument.

A man is not a plan. That is for sure.

[Anonymous]

Interesting that he uses his reduced income as justification why he cannot afford the monthly support from not having the Yellowstone income when he was the one that left the show early. It’s been his investment decisions that have reduced his cash flow lately. One might wonder if he did it on purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems strategic to me on her part that she did this when her kids were older but not yet out of the house. With no kids to house, she'd have zero argument for maintaining the lavish lifestyle. But she had to know she was on thin ground so waited a good long while to try to get out. She doesn't have much of an argument.

A man is not a plan. That is for sure.

Cheaters will cheat.

[Anonymous]

So a rumor circulated on the set that Costner impregnated a woman. He denied it but not that he was having an affair. His wife files for divorce. Sound familiar?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seems strategic to me on her part that she did this when her kids were older but not yet out of the house. With no kids to house, she'd have zero argument for maintaining the lavish lifestyle. But she had to know she was on thin ground so waited a good long while to try to get out. She doesn't have much of an argument.

A man is not a plan. That is for sure.

It's not like she's going to starve. She's just not going to get as much as she could have, had she not signed that prenup two decades ago.

What do you think she could have been doing all these years, to afford her the lifestyle she enjoyed married to a major star?

[Anonymous]

He clearly cheated, pregnancy or not, and therefore the divorce is not her fault. I think prenups should have a requirement to be upped every 10 years, its really ridiculous that you could say that a never married 30 year old would be savvy enough to have her interests represented against an extraordinarily wealthy man who had just been through an extremely acrimonious divorce.

I can't feel THAT bad for someone getting a million dollars and like 40k a month in payments but truly it is not fair at all in the context of the relationship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He clearly cheated, pregnancy or not, and therefore the divorce is not her fault. I think prenups should have a requirement to be upped every 10 years, its really ridiculous that you could say that a never married 30 year old would be savvy enough to have her interests represented against an extraordinarily wealthy man who had just been through an extremely acrimonious divorce.

I can't feel THAT bad for someone getting a million dollars and like 40k a month in payments but truly it is not fair at all in the context of the relationship.

No it's hard to fall on your knees crying for her. But, like, our little ranch house is worth $800k now according to Zillow (which, I know, lol). It's hard to imagine going from having the resources of one of the most successful stars, to living in our (adorable!) house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:$400m and she gets a $1m property settlement (.25%) is spite. It’s a terrible offer to a woman you’ve been with for 25 years and had 3 children with. Much of his estate was built over the course of their married life. A reasonable, non evil person would’ve quietly given her a minimum of $10m (still less than 5%) and avoided all the negative publicity.

She deserves what she agreed to in the prenup.

A reasonable person honors that agreement and doesn’t ask for more.

PP didn't use the word "deserve". The point is that a man with a $400m estate should settle this matter with his partner of 25 years, mother of his 3 children, privately for a conscionable amount. $1m of $400m after an 18 year marriage and 3 kids is unconscionable.

He did. They documented it and signed it.

Paying women to be mothers is a disgusting idea.

She got more of his money when they were partners. He gave her the greatest gift in the world 3 children and she never had to work and probably had Nannie’s. They have the best life/education/ etc

Marriage is not a profitable job the idea that women are paid to be wives and mothers is unconscionable.

19/25 amazing years.

Paying her more after the divorce is terrible practice.

It’s the “Nannie’s” poster again. Has it out for women who can afford nannies.

Not against Nannie’s just pointing out she has a great life all expense paid.

Sorry but you’re not a salaried employee you were a wife. Now you’re not,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:$400m and she gets a $1m property settlement (.25%) is spite. It’s a terrible offer to a woman you’ve been with for 25 years and had 3 children with. Much of his estate was built over the course of their married life. A reasonable, non evil person would’ve quietly given her a minimum of $10m (still less than 5%) and avoided all the negative publicity.

She deserves what she agreed to in the prenup.

A reasonable person honors that agreement and doesn’t ask for more.

PP didn't use the word "deserve". The point is that a man with a $400m estate should settle this matter with his partner of 25 years, mother of his 3 children, privately for a conscionable amount. $1m of $400m after an 18 year marriage and 3 kids is unconscionable.

He did. They documented it and signed it.

Paying women to be mothers is a disgusting idea.

She got more of his money when they were partners. He gave her the greatest gift in the world 3 children and she never had to work and probably had Nannie’s. They have the best life/education/ etc

Marriage is not a profitable job the idea that women are paid to be wives and mothers is unconscionable.

19/25 amazing years.

Paying her more after the divorce is terrible practice.

It’s the “Nannie’s” poster again. Has it out for women who can afford nannies.

Not against Nannie’s just pointing out she has a great life all expense paid.

Sorry but you’re not a salaried employee you were a wife. Now you’re not,

You are very recognizable because of your miscapitalization and mispunctuation of that one word