The Laptop

[Anonymous]

Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Squirrel!

Op here.

So, what is this thread to distract from?

Inflation? Gas prices? The border crisis? Other crises happening in this country and around the world?

This is news.
For years now, we have read post after post on here about how the laptop is fake and nothing more than Russian disinformation.
And, now, after 2 years, the NYTimes is confirming it is real.
The owner of the shop where Hunter took the laptop has been demonized and discredited.
Threads have been shut down, deleted, and even the name of the president's son written in its entirety gets the dreaded "Forbidden!" message.
This is news, pp.

Rightly so.

Absolutely not.

When you’re a business owner entrusted with someone else’s property you don’t just go and give it to Rudy Giuliani.

1. He gave it to FBI and heard nothing.

2. If you leave thing more than 120 days the store owner now owns them. It was on the receipt that Hunter got. So his not Hunter's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Really?

The same FBI that fabricated evidence to support FISA warrants to use to open the investigation of Trump?

I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Yes, you're shocking. The FBI didn't fabricate evidence...

Not sure what you call this....

Clinesmith pleaded guilty to a single false statement charge, admitting that he doctored an email that the FBI relied on as it sought court approval to eavesdrop on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in 2017.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-b9b3c7ef398d00d5dfee9170d66cefec

I call it quite the Overstatement.

LOL. A DOJ lawyer pled guilty to doctoring evidence and you call it an "overstatement."
You're not partisan at all.

Ok. That’s a HUGE scandal!!! How much jail time did he get for such an outrageous offense?

Unfortunately, all he got was probation. Which was a travesty considering how it upended the life of Carter Page and resulted in him not only dishing out quite a bit of $$ in his defense, but the harm caused to his reputation.
Of course, Clinesmith is "one of theirs" so I wasn't expecting a serious punishment.

And, in case you don't know this.... lying is a fireable offense in the FBI. You can do a lot of crap, but if you lie about it, you're gone.

If lying is so bad at the FBI, why were there no consequences for the FBI people who covered up their mismanagement of the USA gymnastics abuse?

The two have nothing to do with one another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m so sick of the Democrats on here who are complete hypocrites and can’t admit anything that makes one of their own look bad. Just admit that the NY Post was right and Hunter is a scumbag. The laptop is real and the emails and photos are real.

You don’t have to defend or minimize everything that Democrats do wrong.

Before the laptop was “Russian disinformation” and now it’s “distracting from Russia and Ukraine.”

Just admit this one and move on.

Hunter is not a politician. Just fyi.

So? He is the president's son. And, when our current president was VP, he clearly used his father's position to benefit from deals with foreign countries.... most of the same countries that are in the news right now. At the very least, it is unethical. The fact that this story was killed by big tech, the Democrats and the media suggest there is even more to it. Was Hunter able to influence policy IRT these countries?
What was Joe's involvement? He claims he knew nothing of his son's business dealings. Emails and pictures prove otherwise.

Contrary to Tucker’s views, asking dumb questions with a smug look on your face is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Telling that you are unable to address the substance and respond only with snark and sarcasm.

There is no substance, just innuendo.

Denying reality doesn't make your views real.

Facts matter. If the grand jury find evidence for charges, they will come. Until then, it is all fluffy BS.

What a flipping hypocrite! You all didn't seem to think that all the news you breathlessly awaited during the Russian collusion investigation was "fluffy BS." Much of which was outright false.
This site never fails to entertain.

Because there was actual evidence of a crime. People actually went to jail.

Yes and there is actual evidence of a crime here. He will be indicted — you’ll see.

I’ve read the entire thread and don’t see any specific charges against him other than receiving emails from foreigners and leaving his laptop at a repair shop. Can someone list the actual crimes he committed? Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

Please point to authenticated evidence. NYT says “appears.”

Get used to Russian disinformation. They are losing their war and that’s all they have. I’m laughing at all you Trumpsters who suddenly believe the New York Times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

You haven't been paying attention during the last administration, have you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

What is Biden accused of, exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

What is Biden accused of, exactly?

Nothing …it is a conspiracy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

Nice opinion articles bet they get paid by the word!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

Seriously, you're going to cite a *John Solomon* article to claim that something is fake??? That's hilarious.

The FBI has confirmed through bank account records that Manafort received the payments listed in the ledger, and his lawyers didn't challenge its veracity at trial.

Interesting that you continue to push this story. Has no one brought you up to speed, comrade?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

This sums it up nicely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

What is Biden accused of, exactly?

Nothing …it is a conspiracy!

Enriching his family by making political introductions and likely giving favors as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

What is Biden accused of, exactly?

Nothing …it is a conspiracy!

Enriching his family by making political introductions and likely giving favors as well.

Well trump does that every day and you do not care…why do you care about a made up story about Biden’s son?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Standard reminder of Democratic tactics in dealing with scandals with the help of MSM:

Step one: Deny that it happened
Step two: Claim that the evidence is fake
Step three: Wait a few months…
Step four: Claim that there is nothing new in the now authenticated evidence

I don't think these folk remember the black ledger Ukraine had on Trump that had illegal campaign contributions. It's essentially what got Manafort canned and then indicted, yet it was false. The laptop had information about it in emails, etc. which is why the laptop story was buried by media.

Here's the original NYT story:

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/15/us/politics/what-is-the-black-ledger.html


Here is the Hill's follow up:

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/449206-fbi-warned-early-and-often-that-manafort-file-might-be-fake-used-it-anyway

What is Biden accused of, exactly?

Nothing …it is a conspiracy!

Enriching his family by making political introductions and likely giving favors as well.

Ok, where is the money trail on it? Easily provable by bank records. And what favors? Did Biden withhold military aid to Ukraine in exchange for a favor or payment? Because THAT would be an impeachable event, no?