Malaysia Airlines Flight Goes Missing En Route to China

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's a fact 20 Freescale employees was on the plane as also confirmed on their own website. And if you further research you will learn the nature of their business and knowledge as well as how closely they work with US military in all facets.Why would someone just steal the jewelry box when the jewelry inside is much much more valuable? They were not after the plane…. Freescale Engineers design unmanned drones, unmanned vehicles, unmanned robotics that can be used in combat or firefighting, long range missile guidance systems, are also the designers for NASA computers and electronics, and designers of US military defense and radars…. It's not the plane they was after! And honestly why would any opposing government/country pass up such a golden opportunity?...

They probably knew how to screw up the transponder and the pinging to screw up any hope of finding out what happened to the plane.

It is conceivable that Flight MH370 plane is 'cloaked', hiding with high-tech electronic warfare weaponry that exists and is used. In fact, this type of technology is precisely the expertise of Freescale, that has 20 employees on board the missing flight

Using this logic I would argue the Dharma Initiative is behind all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And in a new twist, it has emerged that the pilot's wife and three children moved out of the family's home the day before the plane's disappearance.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/missing-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh370-3248001#ixzz2w97d2Fcg

Actually this was alleged days ago and discredited.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And in a new twist, it has emerged that the pilot's wife and three children moved out of the family's home the day before the plane's disappearance.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/missing-malaysian-airlines-flight-mh370-3248001#ixzz2w97d2Fcg

Nobody HAS ever moved in the history of humanity before their ex-husband flies a plane. NOBODY!!! So if I move out tomorrow and my ex-husband disappear, that is EXTREMELY suspicious ~

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yeah I'd never heard before that a black box can be disabled. I don't believe that to be true.

It can….. scary shit

[Anonymous]

There are suspicions that pilot suicide could be behind the missing Boeing 777. How ridiculous. All the evidence points rather to an unsuspected hijacking by someone with good aviation skills. There probably was a struggle on the flight deck resulting in the bizarre climb and descent (remember years ago that BA Jumbo incident over Africa?) and then after gaining control, the hijackers (highly skilled aviators) navigated the aircraft on its bizarre route, flying it to an unidentified location. If it were pilot suicide, then why, after signing off - "All right. Good night" - did the pilot simply not point the aircraft downwards and crash into the sea? Why wait another ten minutes to do so, or another hour, or another three or four or five hours? Pilot suicide can be eliminated because it simply does not fit the scenario we have now been told. It seems to me that a person or persons hijacked the aircraft

[Anonymous]

It doesn't make any sense. Terrorists don't just slope off in secret to do their worst, without leaving any trace of what happened. They like publicity for their violence. The more witnesses to the carnage and the wreckage left behind in the wake of an act of terror the better, as far as they're concerned

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally - something new from the Daily Mail:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2581817/Doomed-airliner-pilot-political-fanatic-Hours-taking-control-flight-MH370-attended-trial-jailed-opposition-leader-sodomite.html

So with 200 plus passengers, cabin crew etc you're saying ONE man manages to disengage multiple systems AND keep hundreds of people under control? What about the co pilot, was he told to sit there and keep quiet? And being called a political 'activist' because he attended a trial of someone he believed in is a bit much. This is a weak flimsy theory. I'll believe it when I see proof that the passengers are still alive!

How do we know he was a "political fanatic"? This is what the media is now saying. Supporting a political party or person by attending their Court appeaerance can hardly be construed as being a "fanatic". For God's sakes, people, whatever has happened to critical thought? I would be more curious about the four or five who did not board the plane even though they checked their luggage. Was the plane searched before take-off after these people chose not to fly? Did they know something? Were they part of this plot and were only there to ensure that all was going as planned?

[Anonymous]

Koren airlines flight 007 .. was slightly off route due to inptting area in co-ordinates ... russia scrambled a fighter jet as it was off course in their air space, the commerical jet did not respond to the fighter jet as it did not see it due to ascending to a higher altitude to save on fuel the figher jet saw this as avaisive action and shot it down. russia firstly denied that its military had shot the passenger jet down and then admitted it, I cannot believe for one min that the malaysian military ignored this unidentified aircraft flying off course over their country and to me it seems all to similar to the russian incident. Maybe someone shot this plane down and now that they realize its a commercial plane, they will never reveal it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't make any sense. Terrorists don't just slope off in secret to do their worst, without leaving any trace of what happened. They like publicity for their violence. The more witnesses to the carnage and the wreckage left behind in the wake of an act of terror the better, as far as they're concerned

Unless this (acquiring the plane) was just step one of the master plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: the four or five who did not board the plane even though they checked their luggage. Was the plane searched before take-off after these people chose not to fly? Did they know something? Were they part of this plot and were only there to ensure that all was going as planned?

My understanding was they "checked in" not "checked their luggage". Not surprising if even five people checked in online (could be a family) but missed a flight in the middle of the night. Do you have citation for "checked their luggage"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are suspicions that pilot suicide could be behind the missing Boeing 777. How ridiculous. All the evidence points rather to an unsuspected hijacking by someone with good aviation skills. There probably was a struggle on the flight deck resulting in the bizarre climb and descent (remember years ago that BA Jumbo incident over Africa?) and then after gaining control, the hijackers (highly skilled aviators) navigated the aircraft on its bizarre route, flying it to an unidentified location. If it were pilot suicide, then why, after signing off - "All right. Good night" - did the pilot simply not point the aircraft downwards and crash into the sea? Why wait another ten minutes to do so, or another hour, or another three or four or five hours? Pilot suicide can be eliminated because it simply does not fit the scenario we have now been told. It seems to me that a person or persons hijacked the aircraft

I agree. Or, as I said earlier, the hijackers weren't killed aviators and were counting on the pilot to fly the plane for them at gunpoint. Except he was killed in a struggle over the controls and because the hijackers couldn't land the plan on their own it crashed when it ran out of fuel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are suspicions that pilot suicide could be behind the missing Boeing 777. How ridiculous. All the evidence points rather to an unsuspected hijacking by someone with good aviation skills. There probably was a struggle on the flight deck resulting in the bizarre climb and descent (remember years ago that BA Jumbo incident over Africa?) and then after gaining control, the hijackers (highly skilled aviators) navigated the aircraft on its bizarre route, flying it to an unidentified location. If it were pilot suicide, then why, after signing off - "All right. Good night" - did the pilot simply not point the aircraft downwards and crash into the sea? Why wait another ten minutes to do so, or another hour, or another three or four or five hours? Pilot suicide can be eliminated because it simply does not fit the scenario we have now been told. It seems to me that a person or persons hijacked the aircraft

Correction: I agree. Or, as I said earlier, the hijackers weren't skilled aviators and were counting on the pilot to fly the plane for them at gunpoint. Except he was killed in a struggle over the controls and because the hijackers couldn't land the plan on their own it crashed when it ran out of fuel.

[Anonymous]

I'm pretty sure that the US and Chinese military/intelligence services know where this plane is but they're not telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: the four or five who did not board the plane even though they checked their luggage. Was the plane searched before take-off after these people chose not to fly? Did they know something? Were they part of this plot and were only there to ensure that all was going as planned?

My understanding was they "checked in" not "checked their luggage". Not surprising if even five people checked in online (could be a family) but missed a flight in the middle of the night. Do you have citation for "checked their luggage"?

They did check their luggage. Reports state that the luggage was taken off of the plane when they did not board. The question is why did these people change their mind and not board the plane at the last minute?

[Anonymous]