Spare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

The Times UK piece linked to a page ago (which I read in full on archive.ph) indicates Harry will blame-shift. Nikkah is a fairly well-regarded in terms of sourcing reporter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Normal people don’t go around at everyone turn explaining incidents with others as “they are jealous.” No one talks like that. Apparently Kate was jealous of Megan. Charles was jealous of Megan. And now turns out his military supervisor was jealous of him too.

No mature person talks like this.

Ok jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

You're trying way too hard to come across as objective but you're not. Also, books are meant to be sold—negative coverage or not—and, this one is on its way to best seller status .

Great! More people will get a better understanding of the writer's true self.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

It seems to me that public opinion is very much against him, both here and abroad. He doesn’t seem like a takes responsibility sort so far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

This is what will happen. But he will be out in time to make it to dear old dad's coronation. He will ultimately blame drugs or booze or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

This is what will happen. But he will be out in time to make it to dear old dad's coronation. He will ultimately blame drugs or booze or something.

Dcum has been infested by the Qanon crowd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

You're trying way too hard to come across as objective but you're not. Also, books are meant to be sold—negative coverage or not—and, this one is on its way to best seller status .

Great! More people will get a better understanding of the writer's true self.

He's neither en elected official nor a working royal, I'm sure he cares .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

This is what will happen. But he will be out in time to make it to dear old dad's coronation. He will ultimately blame drugs or booze or something.

Dcum has been infested by the Qanon crowd.

Are you in denial about something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

You're trying way too hard to come across as objective but you're not. Also, books are meant to be sold—negative coverage or not—and, this one is on its way to best seller status .

Great! More people will get a better understanding of the writer's true self.

He's neither en elected official nor a working royal, I'm sure he cares .

LOL. Clearly he and Meghan DO care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:62 pages — on a book that no one has read yet, based on excerpts that may or may not be accurate. Wow.

I doubt 99% of people posting here have any intention of buying it to support someone's fancy lifestyle. You can help an actual homeless eat a meal with that money.

Buying a memoir = supporting someone's fancy lifestyle . I'm loving the desperation . Too late .

People are often interested in reading celebrity gossip on internet but most aren't interested enough to read a book about or by them.

I absolutely will not but it, but will be happy to borrow it from the library next year if I remember it. It will still be trashy then. I just can’t give them a dollar.

Why would you borrow it from a library? So you're interested ,arent you ? one more thing : Your taxes pay for the library , so YOU are paying for it .

This is the dumbest argument on this thread yet. Congratulations.

Add rabid continent of Africa defender to that list.

Add impossibly ignorant maga-esque poster to the list. Reacting angrily because they're being called out on their stereotypical ignorance. From time to time turn on the national geographic, discovery Channel where you might learn a thing or two .

Calm down and go scroll through your Peace Corps Facebook photo album.

Thanks for admitting that you're ignorant. Next time refrain from venturing into topics you know nothing about . This isn't a bake sale .

The personality of the person writing the above response is the reason for so many divorces in the DC area. What an absolute ass.

No, this is one rabid poster across multiple threads that calls people ignorant and gets hella worked up about stuff - posting over and over again. She’s a crazy outlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

It was in the link I just posted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the subject:

Will the Palace respond to the stories from the book?

I don't see why they would need to. Everyone is doing the work for them. Seems like they are the winners in this.

I agree. The coverage has been exceedingly negative in all published sources - read the comments with each excerpt. The Taliban revelation has been regarded with serious alarm in multiple broadsheets.

I hope we can actually talk about the book and actual, linkable coverage of same and just report the posts attacking those who are putting in relevant comments. The coverage has been universally unflattering to Harry, so some posters who can’t accept that have been attacking. It’s pathetic and weird.

I wonder if Harry will put out is own statement distancing himself from this disaster saying things were taken out of context, misrepresented, unclear, etc. Will he take full responsibility or try to shift blame?

Only if public opinion turns against him.

My money is on a public announcement that he’s in a fancy wellness rehab dealing with exhaustion or some such in the next 6 months.

This is what will happen. But he will be out in time to make it to dear old dad's coronation. He will ultimately blame drugs or booze or something.

He’s never taken responsibility for anything. Why would he start now? The bad pre-Megexit press was due to racism and his family leaking stories to make W&K look better. He’ll likely blame the current negative press on his ghost writer who he’ll say took things out of context and distorted the truth. Perhaps he’ll find a way to try to blame his family for the negative press on his book.

Now that H&M have sold all the dirt they have, there’s nothing left to sell. The docuseries Live to Lead that they produced was a total flop, indicating the public’s only interest in them is the BRF drama. But as this thread and numerous news stories show, the public is getting tired of their schtick. Their window to cash in on their BRF fame is closing fast. I predict, when it’s all said and done, they’ll blow through most of their money and get divorced (let’s face it, if there’s no fortune, no social connections and a tank reputation, Meghan will lose interest with her child-like husband). Harry will then blame Meghan for orchestrating the breakup from his family and manipulating him into saying everything he has in his book and interviews. He’ll beg his family to take him back. They will, but he will live a life in public banishment like Andrew.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate how off topic this is getting. My post with an interview with prior biographer Tom Bower - actually talking about and contextualizing the context of the Spare leaks - was struck. Sorry, was that too factual for the attack troll? Too connected to the actual thread topic?

Bower was interviewed and gave context to the specious claim posted multiple times here about a William affair, and explains some of the apparent disgust towards Meghan and Harry. Minute 35. Mods: this is all literally about public, published book leaks and may be of interest to people actually discussing Spare, and not each other.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IDMpkibWDo4

He's credible in your eyes because he says what you want to hear.

He’s credible because they haven’t sued him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If H wanted a family, why not embrace M's? Oh wait, she's on the outs (or paying them). How is this different?

As far as leaks, M was leaking so much she couldn't hold water. But no one else can leak? GMAF

These two deserve what they get.

it may be a long time coming, but eventually, her mom will die and they'll find out how alone they've made themselves.

They won't be together at that point.

Exactly. And she might be on her second or third husband by then. Oh, I forgot, H is her second husband! Make it her third or fourth.

His dad is on second wife . So....?

You are really stupid. Diana died sugar plum.

Diana died after they were divorced. Camilla is the (mistress turned) second wife.

Everybody knows this, why are you stating the obvious?

Reading comprehension issues?

Yes, you must have them.

Says the one who can’t understand a basic post.