Message
Anonymous wrote:American lifelong hockey fan (go Caps)
I am rooting for Canada tonight.
Then you're no longer an American hockey fan, and certainly not worthy as a Caps fan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody is invading Canada.
Trump is an idiot, and he likes to apply his Queens real estate tactics to everything. That means saying outrageous things, to get his negotiating adversary to blink in order to stave off an imaginary catastrophe.
The smart thing to do is ignore him, and not give an inch.
Tariffs are another deal - I’m sure he’s serious about those. A Canadian boycott makes sense to wield economic pressure, but honestly it has to be pretty targeted to have an impact on the massive US economy.
They do seem to have targeted plans. We can help it out by also boycotting red state goods and buying Canadian.
If you really wanna help...move to Canada.
Anonymous wrote:Mostly MAGAs died from it. Because they don’t believe in science.
Like all of the science they lied to you about, and you were foolish enough to believe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad they are checking into this. I think people are collecting on their parents who are dead. They probably never notified SSA about their parents death and grand parents death and are collecting. I wouldn't be surprised if scammers caught on to this and are collecting. They need to further investigate and prosecute these people.
Like they have a body in their crawl space? My mother died last month, when the death certificate is filed (mortuary did this), SSA is notified. The direct deposit payment was back out of her account before I could even notify the bank she was deceased (didn't have the printed death certificate yet).
Just because you think it in your head doesn't mean it's that simple.
What’s a mortuary?
mortuary /môr′choo͞-ĕr″ē/
noun
A place, especially a funeral home, where dead bodies are kept before burial or cremation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just go to Twitter and Reddit to check info- the truth is somewhere in the middle
Sometimes the truth is NOT somewhere in the middle. For example, what other way can you view Musk's recent infiltration of government agencies than by calling it what it is--an attempt to exert unlawful control over the US federal government. He is not elected or vetted and has huge conflict of interest and his actions are clearly unlawful.
You're delusional.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that you're offended by the truth in no way means bots have taken over. You are a traitor who is supporting a coup. If anyone ougt to be kicked out, it is you OP.
Would that be the same brand of truth that fueled the coup you traitors supported via Spygate, Russiagate, and 2 bogus impeachments?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew the FBI was bullshit soon after the 911 attacks, i was informed that after those attacks they were still more concerned about domestic terrorists.
I was like, international terrorists just attacked us and they are more concerned with domestic terrorists?
Who do you think the J6ers are?
Clearly, you're not very well-versed on J6 & should refrain from commenting further on the subject.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s a mistake to focus on Trump. This is an entire movement that’s taken over. He’s just the hood ornament on the car. He probably doesn’t agree with everything being done, but it’s his get out of jail free card, so he is happy to play along.
I think that is true, to a degree. I know a lot of people who voted for Trump who aren't MAGA, including myself. I find MAGAs disgusting.
So you voted for Trump knowing he was going to be a dictator on day one, and you claim to despise the MAGAs? I don't get it.
Why do you think because I despise MAGA that I love the left? They're worse.
is the “left” trying to burn down democracy?
Every chance they get. Why do you think you lost?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yay! Let’s go after anyone who ever dared to challenge Trump! Totally not a fascist move.
Who is surprised by this? Our democracy is crumbling…
Hahahahaha
How is it crumbling? Being an illegal alien you have broken the law by entering the country. If you are a criminal, that is even worse. Why would a city want to protect people who broke the law? The federal govt has full authority to dictate border security and immigration. A city and state do not have the ability to decline federal laws.
So this is clear cut. A sanctuary city/state violates federal law.
No problem here.
Imagine if cites all over the country could decide to go against federal law for other issues. There would be chaos.
While I hate all things Trump, if NY does have a law on the books that notifies immigrants when federal authorities request their records, that could be seen as obstruction. The feds have a lawful right to enforce immigration. States don't have to help at all. Zero. But they cannot obstruct.
Privacy Protections
"The law provides a number of privacy protections that limit data sharing, including to agencies that primarily enforce immigration laws, and requires disclosure to the license holders when immigration enforcement agencies request data from DMV."
https://dmv.ny.gov/driver-license/driver-licenses-and-the-green-light-law
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats can suck it up.
Promises made, promises kept.
And if Democracy dies in the meantime, at least libs got owned!!!
You are a fool.
Nope just pointing how MAGAs don’t care about the country, they just want to get back at the libs.
If we didn't care about the country, we would have let you continue to destroy it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a disaster. The AMA is actually even more incompetent and corrupt than the CDC.
The AMA has even less credibility than the CDC right now. It has taken positions on political issues, but tried to cloak them in the guise of The ScienceTM.
This post shows just how far gone a large portion of the US population is. Science is science. There is always skepticism, which is why research is always performed to hone data to draw conclusions. That people actually believe science is political is brainwashed rhetoric. If you don't want to believe science then the alternative is to believe narcissistic leaders like Trump, Musk and RFK, Jr.
Where do you have your faith? In dispassionate scientific research or dear leader?
If you actually believe that none of the "mainstream" science has been/is being politicized, you're not only brainwashed, but incredibly naive & woefully ignorant.
Anonymous wrote:What a disaster. The AMA is actually even more incompetent and corrupt than the CDC.
100%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It looks like Trump is testing the guardrails of american democracy.
The senate is never going to convict, clearly impeachment is off the table until at least 2026 unless trump starts a civil war or something.
The judiciary is our only hope, there are a bunch of cases that have gone against trump at the district and appellate levels, these cases are going to go up to the supreme court.
JD Vance has already indicated that this administration might just ignore the supreme court if they rule against the administration.
Do you guys really think SCOTUS is corrupt and is going to hand the country over to Trump?
I don't think the Supreme Court is actually corrupt but we live in strange times
People like Roberts, Kagan, & Gorsuch didn't walk the perfectly straight line up the judicial ladder for decades while passing numerous clearances and background checks just to fumble it all away for one idiot POTUS that will be gone in 4 years. Use your brain. Think. Read.
I might have bought that before the ridiculous immunity decision. Not anymore. They knew they were handing a get-out-jail free card to a criminal who had already attempted a coup and who had a very good chance of being president again. I have no faith left in the republicans on this court.
And now you're sounding like one of the unAmerican idiots. You may as well be MAGA. Sorry, gotta be honest. These people aren't the sleazy, slimy Trumps and Bidens of the world that did little good before becoming very powerful people. They finished top in their class everywhere and walked a straight line everywhere just to get into position for the highest appointment and confirmation. You may have a case to question Thomas's integrity but the other 8 justices can be trusted to protect the Constitution.
Disrespecting the SCOTUS and Constitution puts you in MAGA's camp. Don't be that person. Be a normal person.
That would put Chuckie Schumer in the MAGA camp, would it not?
"I want to tell you Gorsuch, I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions."
And what about MAGA Maxine Waters?
"To hell with the Supreme Court, we will defy them!"
I guess we'd have to put all of the protestors/activists that gathered at the homes of SCOTUS justices in the MAGA camp as well, as in doing so would certainly qualify as disrespect since they were in clear violation of Federal Law...
18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or Parading
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Anonymous wrote:
Jeff is right. Mace just cares about fundraising and in MAGA world, the more outrageous you are in public, the more funds you raise. You'd never know from her current behavior that just a few years ago she said very different things about trans individuals:
Mace’s position on the LGBTQ+ community has radically shifted in recent years.
In 2021, she was one of the only Republicans to sponsor the Serving Our LGBTQ Veterans Act, which proposed establishing a Center for LGBTQ Veterans within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
That same year, she even called for “transgender equality” while asserting herself as a pro-LGBTQ+ rights lawmaker.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/nancy-mace-trans-slur-b2693209.html
There was no "radical shift", that's complete nonsense. The legislation she cosponsored and/or supported contained no text regarding the issue of shared spaces with transgender individuals.
She did, however, vote against The Equality Act which included the following per the Congress.gov summary:
"The bill prohibits an individual from being denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual's gender identity."
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5