Virginia referendum - if you hate MAGA, vote YES (even if your mailing says to vote 'No')

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s confirmed YES!

Weird to celebrate an outcome that forces roughly half of the people in the state to traffick their votes in favor of a cause they do not support.

Yes and it makes sense that the majority of the nova Democrats are mentally unstable reckless driving fingerpointing. They started it phrasing cry babies

Are you so angry that Democrats are finally playing by the same rules as Republicans that you're stroking out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rest of Virginia should seceed. What a travesty.

I think you mean “secede.” And there were lots of yes votes in ROVA—Richmond, Charlottesville, Norfolk, Williamsburg… even Danville was majority yes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s confirmed YES!

Weird to celebrate an outcome that forces roughly half of the people in the state to traffick their votes in favor of a cause they do not support.

Cry harder.

As someone who didn't vote for Trump but did vote for Youngkin, I'm not crying, I just think it's low class.

So…I guess you voted for Sears?

Let's just say I didn't have a strong favorite in that race.

Because you are brain dead? Sears was the worst candidate to ever be nominated in VA literally in the last 75 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 51/49 vote, that ends with a 10/1 result. Appalling.

It’s trumps doing. He started this in Texas

Oh well. Too bad, so sad.

Texas was barely 65% and it was legal based on population growth this is totally illegal

[Anonymous]

I guess this will green light all red states to erase blue votes completely, if the courts allow the va 90% then Texas and everyone else should do the same instead of the reasonably 65%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 51/49 vote, that ends with a 10/1 result. Appalling.

It’s trumps doing. He started this in Texas

Oh well. Too bad, so sad.

Texas was barely 65% and it was legal based on population growth this is totally illegal

A map that turns major blue cities into 1-3 districts is neither legal nor based on "population growth." You're seriously stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 51/49 vote, that ends with a 10/1 result. Appalling.

It’s trumps doing. He started this in Texas

Oh well. Too bad, so sad.

Texas was barely 65% and it was legal based on population growth this is totally illegal

Nope - the Supreme Court ruled that this method is totally ok. Probably because they thought only Republicans would do it, but nevertheless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 51/49 vote, that ends with a 10/1 result. Appalling.

It’s trumps doing. He started this in Texas

Oh well. Too bad, so sad.

Texas was barely 65% and it was legal based on population growth this is totally illegal

A map that turns major blue cities into 1-3 districts is neither legal nor based on "population growth." You're seriously stupid.

You're replying to a Republican, so that goes without saying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s confirmed YES!

Weird to celebrate an outcome that forces roughly half of the people in the state to traffick their votes in favor of a cause they do not support.

Cry harder.

As someone who didn't vote for Trump but did vote for Youngkin, I'm not crying, I just think it's low class.

So…I guess you voted for Sears?

Let's just say I didn't have a strong favorite in that race.

Because you are brain dead? Sears was the worst candidate to ever be nominated in VA literally in the last 75 years.

Sorry, I know this is petty, but if we're comparing brains, I have zero doubt that mine's way more capable than yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rest of Virginia should seceed. What a travesty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s confirmed YES!

Weird to celebrate an outcome that forces roughly half of the people in the state to traffick their votes in favor of a cause they do not support.

Cry harder.

As someone who didn't vote for Trump but did vote for Youngkin, I'm not crying, I just think it's low class.

So…I guess you voted for Sears?

Let's just say I didn't have a strong favorite in that race.

Because you are brain dead? Sears was the worst candidate to ever be nominated in VA literally in the last 75 years.

Sorry, I know this is petty, but if we're comparing brains, I have zero doubt that mine's way more capable than yours.

I mean, if you looked and Spanberger and Sears and couldn't pick a strong favorite, that does not reflect well on your, uh, capable brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A 51/49 vote, that ends with a 10/1 result. Appalling.

It looks like "YES" will receive the majority of votes. Trump didn't even win a majority and yet he has been able to terrorize all of America.

77M idiots foisted the orange sack of shit on to the 340M Americans.

That's the way the way voting works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A 51/49 vote, that ends with a 10/1 result. Appalling.

It’s trumps doing. He started this in Texas

Oh well. Too bad, so sad.

Yep liberals are saying, they started it! Reminds me of what I used to hear in kindergarten. Are liberals just bratty cry babies?

Who’s crying tonight?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s confirmed YES!

Weird to celebrate an outcome that forces roughly half of the people in the state to traffick their votes in favor of a cause they do not support.

Cry harder.

As someone who didn't vote for Trump but did vote for Youngkin, I'm not crying, I just think it's low class.

So…I guess you voted for Sears?

Let's just say I didn't have a strong favorite in that race.

Because you are brain dead? Sears was the worst candidate to ever be nominated in VA literally in the last 75 years.

Sorry, I know this is petty, but if we're comparing brains, I have zero doubt that mine's way more capable than yours.

I mean, if you looked and Spanberger and Sears and couldn't pick a strong favorite, that does not reflect well on your, uh, capable brain.

I thank your less capable brain for bestowing me with that profound bit of wisdom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s confirmed YES!

Weird to celebrate an outcome that forces roughly half of the people in the state to traffick their votes in favor of a cause they do not support.

What does this even mean?

Classic tactic of pretending you don't understand the obvious because there's nothing you can say against it.

“Trafficking votes” is supposed to be obvious?