Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You people will go to any lengths to absolve a murderer. The point is that Rittenhouse illegally carried a gun that was purchased by another person who illegally gave it to Rittenhouse so that he could "patrol" and area is already a problem. Then he shot and killed two people with that gun and wounded another. The histories of those men, as felons, is only important if Rittenhouse knew at the time that he was shooting felons, which he did not. He has said that he did not know the men. As far as he was concerned, he was shooting people who were on the verge of sainthood. But he went into an area armed with an assault weapon, he stalked an individual into a parking lot and shot him.

Rittenhouse shot the first person in the parking lot and initiated the entire situation. The second individual struck him in the head after he had shot the first victim. At that point, it is no longer self-defense. At that point, the second victim was trying to stop an alleged criminal who who watched commit a felony murder. And the third individual did not assault him, but was still shot. He might have a slim chance of getting off on the second murder as self-defense, but it doesn't absolve him of the first murder or the third attempted murder. The only victim he has a self-defense defense against is the man who hit him with the skateboard and even that is a questionable defense.

But the fact is that it was illegal for him to be there after curfew and it was illegal for him to be armed before you even get to the murders and attempted murders.

He was very, very wrong and he should be convicted at a minimum of the misdemeanors and two felonies. You can excuse the one murder, but not anything else.

I forgot to add that since Rittenhouse had no knowledge of the victims history, their history does not absolve Rittenhouse in any way. You can't just go and shoot a person on the idea that they may be a felon and deserve it. Classic blame the victim and has nothing to do with Rittenhouse's innocence or guilt. He is a vigilante murderer, not the hero you all are trying to make him out to be, after the fact.

[Anonymous]

So has fugitive "good guy" Rittenhouse turned up yet? Or is he still in the wind?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So has fugitive "good guy" Rittenhouse turned up yet? Or is he still in the wind?

Apparently, his location has been revealed to the judge, the court clerk and the Sheriff, but no one else. The prosecution has object that they do not know his whereabouts, but the judge has accepted the situation on the argument that there have been threats to Rittenhouse and his family since he was released on bail. So his whereabouts are not known to the public, but not completely unknown either.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/02/11/kyle-rittenhouse-court-bail/

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I’m unclear what posting the rap sheets of the victims has to do with anything. Rittenhouse didn’t know any of that. He just went to kill people. Don’t hold up the victims’ crimes as some sort of ex post facto defense for why Rittenhouse did it.

[Anonymous]

It’s obvious to anyone with even the most rudimentary photoshop skills that the gun was edited into that guy’s hand. My DD could do a better fake pic than that.

Pretty pathetic.

[Anonymous]

What was a 17 year old doing in another state with a rifle? Shouldn't his mother be arrested for contributing to the delinquency of a minor? Was he even enrolled in school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenosha_unrest_shooting

The people that post here don’t have the facts of the situation and form their opinions based on ignorance and untruths.




The photos are real and not photoshopped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious to anyone with even the most rudimentary photoshop skills that the gun was edited into that guy’s hand. My DD could do a better fake pic than that.

Pretty pathetic.

https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2020/09/12/gaige-grosskreutz-kenosha-shootings-survivor-speaks-out/

(CNN) — Only one of the three men shot during a night of protests in Kenosha last month survived, and he’s still reliving it every day.

“That’s all I think about,” Gaige Grosskreutz, 22, told CNN in an exclusive interview Tuesday. “I play it back in my head, I think about it all the time.”

Grosskreutz says he packed his medic bag — and his licensed gun

Disturbed by video of the Blake shooting, Grosskreutz said he made the 40-mile trip from his home in Milwaukee to Kenosha to attend the protests.

Grosskreutz said he packed medical supplies in a small backpack to be ready to provide medical attention. He also said he decided to bring his licensed gun with him. He said he was concerned after seeing a call to arms on Facebook by a group called the Kenosha Guard, a self-styled militia group that was using the social media platform to encourage armed citizens to take to the streets.

“Everybody was there exercising their right to protest. And there were some people who were exercising their right to bear arms, including myself,” he said.

“I never fired my gun,” Grosskreutz said. “I was there to help people. Not hurt people.”

Grosskreutz said he has had run-ins with police in his past and paid his debt. But he says he had every right to carry his firearm.

“I’m not a felon,” he said. “I have my concealed carry, I’ve had it for years. That was my gun. My firearm. I had a legal right to possess it and to possess it concealed.”

Ok so it’s well established that the photos are not photoshopped. Grosskreutz had a handgun on him that night and drew it.

[Anonymous]

When is his trial?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s obvious to anyone with even the most rudimentary photoshop skills that the gun was edited into that guy’s hand. My DD could do a better fake pic than that.

Pretty pathetic.

https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2020/09/12/gaige-grosskreutz-kenosha-shootings-survivor-speaks-out/

(CNN) — Only one of the three men shot during a night of protests in Kenosha last month survived, and he’s still reliving it every day.

“That’s all I think about,” Gaige Grosskreutz, 22, told CNN in an exclusive interview Tuesday. “I play it back in my head, I think about it all the time.”

Grosskreutz says he packed his medic bag — and his licensed gun

Disturbed by video of the Blake shooting, Grosskreutz said he made the 40-mile trip from his home in Milwaukee to Kenosha to attend the protests.

Grosskreutz said he packed medical supplies in a small backpack to be ready to provide medical attention. He also said he decided to bring his licensed gun with him. He said he was concerned after seeing a call to arms on Facebook by a group called the Kenosha Guard, a self-styled militia group that was using the social media platform to encourage armed citizens to take to the streets.

“Everybody was there exercising their right to protest. And there were some people who were exercising their right to bear arms, including myself,” he said.

“I never fired my gun,” Grosskreutz said. “I was there to help people. Not hurt people.”

Grosskreutz said he has had run-ins with police in his past and paid his debt. But he says he had every right to carry his firearm.

“I’m not a felon,” he said. “I have my concealed carry, I’ve had it for years. That was my gun. My firearm. I had a legal right to possess it and to possess it concealed.”

Ok so it’s well established that the photos are not photoshopped. Grosskreutz had a handgun on him that night and drew it.

And? According the GOP worldview, he was a good guy with a gun, no? Trying to stop a crazed right wing killer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

I'm not sure people like that PP even understand the dangers and evils of communism.