Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
Yes it is. It's "forge a public document" in VA, a felony. Don't know about WI. People often get arrested and do time for this when they put, say, their brother's name on a speeding ticket instead of their own. The article says they tried to reach the police captain who allegedly told the lawyer to lie on the paperwork. Lawyer needs to lose his license and if true the police captain needs to go through some things. Also I noticed the judge setting bond is also named Schroder with the same spelling as Ricky. Hmmm. |
Anonymous
The lawyer admitted to falsifying a legal document. It really does not matter if the police told you to do it. |
Anonymous
The lawyer didn't lie to the court. He gave the court alternative facts. |
Anonymous
Beautiful work there, Kellyanne! |
Anonymous
Facts have a well known liberal bias. |
Anonymous
| I literally laughed out loud when I saw that double murderer Kyle Rittenhouse is in the wind. I mean it’s just so... of course his fellow white supremacists were willing to raise his bail money and of course the judge was willing to set bail in the first place. Misguided faith in a murderer. I guess he has yet to go through trial so “alleged murderer.” But what a dumb POS. |
Anonymous
He probably cried into his My Pillow that he didn’t get to storm the Capitol on January 6th. |
Anonymous
|
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rittenhouse-accused-violating-bond-judge-75823282
Absolutely ridiculous. His lawyers should know better. They moved their client from the address on record and did not tell the court beforehand about it. Then when called out for breaking the conditions of bond which were very explicit, they claim that he was receiving death threats and they preemptively moved him. As lawyers, they should know better. You don't get to violate the law and legal agreements first and ask forgiveness later. That's a recipe for losing a case. If this was really an issue, they should have immediately told the court that he was receiving death threats and that they wanted to move him to a more secure location and seal the location for the court only. But they moved him back in December and had no plans to reveal what they had done and did not for 2 months until they were caught. Besides, there are plenty of people who have followed the rules who have received death threats. There are plenty of minority alleged criminals who have received death threats and have not violated the terms of their bond or at least appealed to the court before such actions. This accused murderer has shown on more than one occasion that he is a flight risk. He needs to remain behind bars while waiting for his trial. If he was a minority, it wouldn't even be a question, and there wouldn't be a delay in re-arresting him. #WhiteMalePrivilege |
Anonymous
Do we really know he was not there, though? It seems the court is absolutely not monitoring him and Donald Trump invited all good patriots to DC. |
Anonymous
I can’t imagine that he wouldn’t have been noticed in the footage so far. Being there would be totally on brand. |
Anonymous
|
Huber was a felon and couldn’t have legally carried a gun. But he had his skateboard and he used it to crack Rittenhouse on the head and shoulder.
Fellow rioter and assailant Gaige Grosskreutz was also a felon, but he was carrying a handgun. If you haven’t seen the series of images where Grosskreutz first approached Rittenhouse, who is down, with his hands raised before suddenly drawing his illegally-carried handgun on him. 
|
Anonymous
A grown man hitting another person on the head with a skateboard could fracture their skull and kill them. |
Anonymous
|
You people will go to any lengths to absolve a murderer. The point is that Rittenhouse illegally carried a gun that was purchased by another person who illegally gave it to Rittenhouse so that he could "patrol" and area is already a problem. Then he shot and killed two people with that gun and wounded another. The histories of those men, as felons, is only important if Rittenhouse knew at the time that he was shooting felons, which he did not. He has said that he did not know the men. As far as he was concerned, he was shooting people who were on the verge of sainthood. But he went into an area armed with an assault weapon, he stalked an individual into a parking lot and shot him.
Rittenhouse shot the first person in the parking lot and initiated the entire situation. The second individual struck him in the head after he had shot the first victim. At that point, it is no longer self-defense. At that point, the second victim was trying to stop an alleged criminal who who watched commit a felony murder. And the third individual did not assault him, but was still shot. He might have a slim chance of getting off on the second murder as self-defense, but it doesn't absolve him of the first murder or the third attempted murder. The only victim he has a self-defense defense against is the man who hit him with the skateboard and even that is a questionable defense. But the fact is that it was illegal for him to be there after curfew and it was illegal for him to be armed before you even get to the murders and attempted murders. He was very, very wrong and he should be convicted at a minimum of the misdemeanors and two felonies. You can excuse the one murder, but not anything else. |