Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

I'm not sure people like that PP even understand the dangers and evils of communism.

The view of pp is truly frightening. And, I don't use that word lightly. Frightening.
To think that this behavior by the press is acceptable? And, to justify and condone it? Unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

The reason these guys got doxxed is because - like morons - they used their government email address on government-provided equipment to financial support Rittenhouse. What a bunch of idiots. They couldn't even bother to get home and use a Hotmail or Gmail account on their iPad or personal laptop.

It also calls into question whether these police are (1) exercising the correct level of force in encounters with suspects and (2) if they harbor any discriminatory views. Both of which are massive financial liability for taxpayers who give them a paycheck.

You're allowed to be a bigoted ass in America. But you don't have a right to a government paycheck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

I'm not sure people like that PP even understand the dangers and evils of communism.

I don’t know why Repos keep prostrating themselves on the ground and wailing about “evils of communism” when the GOP is literally fascist, right now.

And like it or not, a white supremacist in the government supporting a violent white supremacist murderer is actually something that we should as citizens be made aware of. DP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

I'm not sure people like that PP even understand the dangers and evils of communism.

I don’t know why Repos keep prostrating themselves on the ground and wailing about “evils of communism” when the GOP is literally fascist, right now.

And like it or not, a white supremacist in the government supporting a violent white supremacist murderer is actually something that we should as citizens be made aware of. DP.

We aren’t the ones fencing ourselves in with guns pointed out towards the people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Isn't it interesting that Twitter claims to delete all posts that have information from hacking.
Oh, no, but not when the "politics" of the post meets with their approval.
This just proves they are FOS when they made that "claim" when it came to the NYPost and Hunter Biden's laptop.

WTH is any media group doxing people who made donations to his defense fund?

That’s the media’s JOB, idiot. To go out and find these domestic enemies and expose them so they can be held accountable in one way or another for supporting a racist killer. So maybe giving legal-fund donations isn’t technically illegal. Fine. But there are still plenty of ways these donors can suffer consequences, and the media is letting us know who these people are, so those consequences can be meted out.

WTF?

No - that is NOT the media's job! At all.

To access hacked material to dox people who contribute to a legal defense fund? You have to be f'ing kidding.
So, you are ok with left-wing activists attacking rank-and-file law enforcement officers and EMTs who donated $10 or $20 to a legal defense fund of someone they believe acted in self-defense?

Do you even hear yourself? Do you think you are in communist China or North Korea?

I'm not sure people like that PP even understand the dangers and evils of communism.

I don’t know why Repos keep prostrating themselves on the ground and wailing about “evils of communism” when the GOP is literally fascist, right now.

And like it or not, a white supremacist in the government supporting a violent white supremacist murderer is actually something that we should as citizens be made aware of. DP.

We aren’t the ones fencing ourselves in with guns pointed out towards the people.

You mean the insurrectionists? GMAFB.

[Anonymous]

Judge poisoning jury

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge poisoning jury

JFC. Is the judge another dirty Trump hire or just incompetent? WTF does he think we should societally call “people who got shot by the accused”?

[Anonymous]

So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

The people Kyle Rittenhouse murdered were trying to rape him? That’s news to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

The people Kyle Rittenhouse murdered were trying to rape him? That’s news to me.

They were trying to disarm Rittenhouse after he had been spotted brandishing/pointing the firearm at the crowd.

I think he will ultimately be convicted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

The people Kyle Rittenhouse murdered were trying to rape him? That’s news to me.

They were trying to disarm Rittenhouse after he had been spotted brandishing/pointing the firearm at the crowd.

I think he will ultimately be convicted.

It's exactly like when Martin was called a victim as people denied that he was bashing a guy's head into a curb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

The people Kyle Rittenhouse murdered were trying to rape him? That’s news to me.

They were trying to disarm Rittenhouse after he had been spotted brandishing/pointing the firearm at the crowd.

I think he will ultimately be convicted.

That sounds more like a job for the police. Not people in a crowd. Because to suggest otherwise lends credibility to the goons who attacked Amon Arbery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

The people Kyle Rittenhouse murdered were trying to rape him? That’s news to me.

They were trying to disarm Rittenhouse after he had been spotted brandishing/pointing the firearm at the crowd.

I think he will ultimately be convicted.

It's exactly like when Martin was called a victim as people denied that he was bashing a guy's head into a curb.

That was different. Martin was much younger than Zimmerman. He was scared and he had to preemptively engage Zimmerman in order to protect himself, because if he waited for Zimmerman to actually get his hands on him, it would be too late. You’re talking about a full grown 200+ lb man against a boy. He had to strike first. It was the only option he had.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

The people Kyle Rittenhouse murdered were trying to rape him? That’s news to me.

They were trying to disarm Rittenhouse after he had been spotted brandishing/pointing the firearm at the crowd.

I think he will ultimately be convicted.

That sounds more like a job for the police. Not people in a crowd. Because to suggest otherwise lends credibility to the goons who attacked Amon Arbery.

Amon Arbery didn't have a firearm that he was brandishing against others. So yeah, that's a failed comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, if a man attacks me or attempts to rape me, and I shoot him in self-defense, you think *he* is now *my* “victim”.

No dear. Life doesn’t work that way.

I’m STILL the victim. I just chose NOT to be victimized. If I killed you because you were trying to harm me, that doesn’t mean you’re somehow magically transformed into righteousness just because you’re dead.

It just makes you a dead criminal assailant.


I’m still the victim.

+1000