Rather than fetishize numbers that may be wildly off you might ask whether there’s any real point left to operating TJ as a magnet. Objective observers not so caught up in the idea of “winning” by kicking Asian and/or Carson/Longfellow/Rocky Run kids out would say probably not. |
While we are at it, let's also shut down all math. Along with student debt and home mortgage. Because some people don't like it! If I don't like/disagree with something let's just shut it down. |
There are certainly more low-income students there than before. There may be no way to know exact #s. Wanted to expand access isn’t “kicking” anyone.
|
Certainly is - when only Asian numbers are going down. 27% up for whites is part of expanding access. |
When a group that makes up 15%-20% of the county's population gets over 50% of all TJ seats they don't have a lot to complain about. At least try telling that to groups that make up more than 20% and only get less than 5% of the seats. |
Agree any changes to the system will negatively impact Asians since they are so greatly overrepresented. |
Down to 54%? GMAFB.
|
It’s only ok because Asians are the ones being discriminated against. If it were black or Hispanic kids the outrage would be endless. |
I mean, Black and Hispanic students have been discriminated against for the entirety of TJ's history on the grounds that not being able to keep up with students whose parents funded expensive exam prep made them somehow "less qualified". And people still spout crap like that, and the false nonsense that Black and Hispanic parents "don't care as much about their child's education", when the relevant point to this conversation is that they don't start focusing narrowly on one single educational opportunity at an extraordinarily early age. Which is understandable, given that THEY COULDN'T GET IN BECAUSE OF EXAM PREP CULTURE. |
They were not just somehow less qualified, but objectively less qualified based on standardized tests and other objective criteria. Unless the discrimination is unjust or prejudicial, it is perfectly rational. People make such discriminatory decisions on a daily basis - you choose products and services by discriminating against those that you don't choose. If you believe the discrimination against blacks and Hispanic students were unjust or prejudicial, the burden of proof is on you to show that. |
Changing TJ's admission policy will not change the fact that some people will further enrichment (whether solving AOPS/Khan Academy problems on their own (for free) or going to AOPS/RM, etc.). If you have children you will know that some kids are either into it or not. You cannot force a kid to be good at math (at least to the level of AIME, etc.) or any other subject for that matter, no matter how much money you spend. Even if you change the admission policy, the people who do not have time/resources will continue not to have these resources. 21 9th graders at TJ dropped out for some reason (freshman is now down to 529 as of end of March from 550). This is unprecedented. What gives? Unless you provide resources (at a far earlier age), high school is too late to overcome falling behind what has accumulated for 14 years. TJ is not that kind of place. Figure out why there is less representation for URMs/FARMs even at the AAP level starting in 3rd grade. Fix the problem. Don't pretend to have solved the problem. |
I know you are just trolling, but there is nothing objective about a test that produces such disparate results in favor of this who pay to prep. |
It is a slippery slope. Who draws the line, for what aspects of life, and where does it stop. |
This is the bad faith deflection- “TJ is simply a mirror…Fix the inequality earlier.” Why not both? |
Move to a lottery with anyone above a 3.5 qualifying and solve the problem that way. |