new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With all of Avenatti's accusations, this guy could not figure out how to come forward to the Dems on the Judicial Committee? Sorry. This is BS.

+1,000,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wee bit hypocritical to post links from strongly-biased "news" sources that have fact-checking failures themselves.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.

Be

Hilarious! So you feel the same way about the strong left bias of the Huffington Post and NYT, right?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/huffington-post/%3famp

I would verify sources from Huffington Post. And read the articles with a grain of salt - if I happen to come across an article from there (not often).

NYT news reporting is generally reliable. I read op-eds as opinions, not facts. It’s overall less-biased and closer to neutral than many others.

NYT reporting hasn’t been reliable, at all, for a long long time.
Didn’t they win a Pulitzer for the russia collusion lie?

That is your bias speaking.

“Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting”
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

But people (and the media) easily confuse the op-ed pieces as factual. The original NYT article was reported under the heading of News Analysis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wee bit hypocritical to post links from strongly-biased "news" sources that have fact-checking failures themselves.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.

Be

Hilarious! So you feel the same way about the strong left bias of the Huffington Post and NYT, right?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/huffington-post/%3famp

I would verify sources from Huffington Post. And read the articles with a grain of salt - if I happen to come across an article from there (not often).

NYT news reporting is generally reliable. I read op-eds as opinions, not facts. It’s overall less-biased and closer to neutral than many others.

NYT reporting hasn’t been reliable, at all, for a long long time.
Didn’t they win a Pulitzer for the russia collusion lie?

That is your bias speaking.

“Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting”
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

But people (and the media) easily confuse the op-ed pieces as factual. The original NYT article was reported under the heading of News Analysis.

Yes, think of all of the people who watch the opinion shows on Fox and think they are news. Scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

It’s a primary and we haven’t held a single vote yet. Unless the Nazi Old Party you support, the Democrats actually believe in Democracy so we’re actually having a primary, not quashing dissent of the Fuhrer.

You’re mistaking rage for desperation. I realize that you don’t believe sexual assault exists, but it does, and it’s enormously common, to emboldened by parents who teach their sons that they can have what they want whenever they want and show them that there will be no consequences for their dear boys. Those parents are all Kavanaugh supporters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A wee bit hypocritical to post links from strongly-biased "news" sources that have fact-checking failures themselves.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/
Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.

Be

Hilarious! So you feel the same way about the strong left bias of the Huffington Post and NYT, right?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mediabiasfactcheck.com/huffington-post/%3famp

I would verify sources from Huffington Post. And read the articles with a grain of salt - if I happen to come across an article from there (not often).

NYT news reporting is generally reliable. I read op-eds as opinions, not facts. It’s overall less-biased and closer to neutral than many others.

NYT reporting hasn’t been reliable, at all, for a long long time.
Didn’t they win a Pulitzer for the russia collusion lie?

That is your bias speaking.

“Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left, but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting”
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

But people (and the media) easily confuse the op-ed pieces as factual. The original NYT article was reported under the heading of News Analysis.

Yes, think of all of the people who watch the opinion shows on Fox and think they are news. Scary.

Don’t forget CNN and MSNBC. Speaking of scary...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

It’s a primary and we haven’t held a single vote yet. Unless the Nazi Old Party you support, the Democrats actually believe in Democracy so we’re actually having a primary, not quashing dissent of the Fuhrer.

You’re mistaking rage for desperation. I realize that you don’t believe sexual assault exists, but it does, and it’s enormously common, to emboldened by parents who teach their sons that they can have what they want whenever they want and show them that there will be no consequences for their dear boys. Those parents are all Kavanaugh supporters.

I’m sorry, but you sound absolutely nutty with your obsessive need to blame a man for something with zero proof or corroborating witnesses. Using your “logic,” I could make some horrible allegations about you or someone you love. I could say it happened decades ago, and anyone who doesn’t believe me is a misogynist. How would you defend yourself?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

It’s a primary and we haven’t held a single vote yet. Unless the Nazi Old Party you support, the Democrats actually believe in Democracy so we’re actually having a primary, not quashing dissent of the Fuhrer.

You’re mistaking rage for desperation. I realize that you don’t believe sexual assault exists, but it does, and it’s enormously common, to emboldened by parents who teach their sons that they can have what they want whenever they want and show them that there will be no consequences for their dear boys. Those parents are all Kavanaugh supporters.

I’m sorry, but you sound absolutely nutty with your obsessive need to blame a man for something with zero proof or corroborating witnesses. Using your “logic,” I could make some horrible allegations about you or someone you love. I could say it happened decades ago, and anyone who doesn’t believe me is a misogynist. How would you defend yourself?

By proclaiming my innocence, maintaining my calm and insisting on the fullest possible investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

It’s a primary and we haven’t held a single vote yet. Unless the Nazi Old Party you support, the Democrats actually believe in Democracy so we’re actually having a primary, not quashing dissent of the Fuhrer.

You’re mistaking rage for desperation. I realize that you don’t believe sexual assault exists, but it does, and it’s enormously common, to emboldened by parents who teach their sons that they can have what they want whenever they want and show them that there will be no consequences for their dear boys. Those parents are all Kavanaugh supporters.

I’m sorry, but you sound absolutely nutty with your obsessive need to blame a man for something with zero proof or corroborating witnesses. Using your “logic,” I could make some horrible allegations about you or someone you love. I could say it happened decades ago, and anyone who doesn’t believe me is a misogynist. How would you defend yourself?

By proclaiming my innocence, maintaining my calm and insisting on the fullest possible investigation.

Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

All the people that CBF named as having been there say they don't know what she's talking about. She can't say when it happened and can't say where it happened. She never told anybody until supposedly 30 years later. Even her own friend Leland Keyser says she doesn't believe this story, didn't know Brett K and rarely hung out with Prep kids. Her own father sided with Kavanaugh. Ask yourself why that might be. Maybe he doesn't believe this story either.

What possible lead is there to investigate? Serious question. Who is there left to talk to? Maybe just go to every house in a certain part of MoCo and ask all the owners if they remember something like this in the summer of 82? It took a year but I'm glad the majority of people are starting to see this for just how nutty it was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

All the people that CBF named as having been there say they don't know what she's talking about. She can't say when it happened and can't say where it happened. She never told anybody until supposedly 30 years later. Even her own friend Leland Keyser says she doesn't believe this story, didn't know Brett K and rarely hung out with Prep kids. Her own father sided with Kavanaugh. Ask yourself why that might be. Maybe he doesn't believe this story either.

What possible lead is there to investigate? Serious question. Who is there left to talk to? Maybe just go to every house in a certain part of MoCo and ask all the owners if they remember something like this in the summer of 82? It took a year but I'm glad the majority of people are starting to see this for just how nutty it was.

Agree 100%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

All the people that CBF named as having been there say they don't know what she's talking about. She can't say when it happened and can't say where it happened. She never told anybody until supposedly 30 years later. Even her own friend Leland Keyser says she doesn't believe this story, didn't know Brett K and rarely hung out with Prep kids. Her own father sided with Kavanaugh. Ask yourself why that might be. Maybe he doesn't believe this story either.

What possible lead is there to investigate? Serious question. Who is there left to talk to? Maybe just go to every house in a certain part of MoCo and ask all the owners if they remember something like this in the summer of 82? It took a year but I'm glad the majority of people are starting to see this for just how nutty it was.

Agree 100%.

I agree as well. And, then the latest NYTimes story was premised on something that someone said, yet the authors never talked to that person and the supposed "victim" says she has no memory of the event. The authors didn't speak to her either.
This passes as "evidence" for some of these nuts.
The NYTimes story should have never been published. Unless it was in some gossip tabloid. Alongside a story that Jennifer Aniston gave birth to an alien. Because that is about how credible the story is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

All the people that CBF named as having been there say they don't know what she's talking about. She can't say when it happened and can't say where it happened. She never told anybody until supposedly 30 years later. Even her own friend Leland Keyser says she doesn't believe this story, didn't know Brett K and rarely hung out with Prep kids. Her own father sided with Kavanaugh. Ask yourself why that might be. Maybe he doesn't believe this story either.

What possible lead is there to investigate? Serious question. Who is there left to talk to? Maybe just go to every house in a certain part of MoCo and ask all the owners if they remember something like this in the summer of 82? It took a year but I'm glad the majority of people are starting to see this for just how nutty it was.

Agree 100%.

I agree as well. And, then the latest NYTimes story was premised on something that someone said, yet the authors never talked to that person and the supposed "victim" says she has no memory of the event. The authors didn't speak to her either.
This passes as "evidence" for some of these nuts.
The NYTimes story should have never been published. Unless it was in some gossip tabloid. Alongside a story that Jennifer Aniston gave birth to an alien. Because that is about how credible the story is.

This, exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

It’s a primary and we haven’t held a single vote yet. Unless the Nazi Old Party you support, the Democrats actually believe in Democracy so we’re actually having a primary, not quashing dissent of the Fuhrer.

You’re mistaking rage for desperation. I realize that you don’t believe sexual assault exists, but it does, and it’s enormously common, to emboldened by parents who teach their sons that they can have what they want whenever they want and show them that there will be no consequences for their dear boys. Those parents are all Kavanaugh supporters.

I’m sorry, but you sound absolutely nutty with your obsessive need to blame a man for something with zero proof or corroborating witnesses. Using your “logic,” I could make some horrible allegations about you or someone you love. I could say it happened decades ago, and anyone who doesn’t believe me is a misogynist. How would you defend yourself?

By proclaiming my innocence, maintaining my calm and insisting on the fullest possible investigation.

Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

I promise you it happened. I just can't remember when it happened, where it happened, or who was there. But it did happen, and I'm accusing you of doing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

Well said. Their desperation is pathetic. And they STILL don’t have a viable candidate.

It’s a primary and we haven’t held a single vote yet. Unless the Nazi Old Party you support, the Democrats actually believe in Democracy so we’re actually having a primary, not quashing dissent of the Fuhrer.

You’re mistaking rage for desperation. I realize that you don’t believe sexual assault exists, but it does, and it’s enormously common, to emboldened by parents who teach their sons that they can have what they want whenever they want and show them that there will be no consequences for their dear boys. Those parents are all Kavanaugh supporters.

I’m sorry, but you sound absolutely nutty with your obsessive need to blame a man for something with zero proof or corroborating witnesses. Using your “logic,” I could make some horrible allegations about you or someone you love. I could say it happened decades ago, and anyone who doesn’t believe me is a misogynist. How would you defend yourself?

By proclaiming my innocence, maintaining my calm and insisting on the fullest possible investigation.

Right. A “full” investigation of something that may or may not have happened somewhere at sometime 35 years ago that no one remembers. Good luck in your defense.

I promise you it happened. I just can't remember when it happened, where it happened, or who was there. But it did happen, and I'm accusing you of doing it.

At least Chanel Miller had a drunk blackout and could remember anything. Was CBF also in a drunken blackout?