What's going on with FCBEscola NOVA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the point is that it isn’t cheap. Even $3.5k is double what most are paying for that level of soccer (C and D level at big clubs, which is the appropriate level outside of the 3 or 4 teams club wide that are at a higher level than that, from results).

Why do you care? Obviously your kid isn’t there so the price doesn’t affect you. Please share with the class where your kid plays so we can start a forum thread discussing its merits.

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

Pro/rel in *youth* soccer? I missed that one, but I'd gladly go to it.

I think it beats having 10-0 blowouts across the board because teams aren't competing at the right level.

Except for the fact that getting blown out 10-0 is exactly how a team gets relegated and blowing teams out 10-0 is how the other team gets promoted.

[Anonymous]

I find it interesting how often this thread brings up the expense of Barca or soccer in general. Really? In this area? Expensive is a relative, subjective concept. Is $3k a year a lot of money? Sure. So is paying more than that each month for a mortgage. It’s only too expensive if you can’t afford it. $3000 for a structured, professionally run activity 4 days a week 10 months a year for my kid at one of the best fields in the area? Sounds like a pretty good value to me. There are parents paying that amount for piano lessons, after school gymnastics, family vacations. There are kids with $1000 iPhones. Who is the judge of what is too expensive and where a family can choose to allocate their money?

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

Pro/rel in *youth* soccer? I missed that one, but I'd gladly go to it.

I think it beats having 10-0 blowouts across the board because teams aren't competing at the right level.

Doesn’t NCSL have a pro/rel system? Since this is a thread on Barca, to get this back on topic, why don’t their teams compete there instead of rec tournaments? Seems to be the appropriate place, especially if part of the argument is to keep down costs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

That's a fair point, although I don't know where the other thread is. However, the subject doesn't belong here by any means. Barca plays in EDP which has relegation and promotion anyways.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

That's a fair point, although I don't know where the other thread is. However, the subject doesn't belong here by any means. Barca plays in EDP which has relegation and promotion anyways.

Use the search feature to find the thread. If it doesn’t exist then start a new thread but don’t hijack a thread with an off topic subject because you do t know how to search or click a button.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the point is that it isn’t cheap. Even $3.5k is double what most are paying for that level of soccer (C and D level at big clubs, which is the appropriate level outside of the 3 or 4 teams club wide that are at a higher level than that, from results).

What does “paying for that level of soccer” mean? If it means paying for high quality dedicated professional coaches and fantastic facilities? Then yes. If you mean paying for wins or climbing some perceived ladder, then we are talking different languages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the point is that it isn’t cheap. Even $3.5k is double what most are paying for that level of soccer (C and D level at big clubs, which is the appropriate level outside of the 3 or 4 teams club wide that are at a higher level than that, from results).

What does “paying for that level of soccer” mean? If it means paying for high quality dedicated professional coaches and fantastic facilities? Then yes. If you mean paying for wins or climbing some perceived ladder, then we are talking different languages.

It means that those teams, other than the few boys teams that play a bit better, are roughly equivalent to Loudoun or Arlington's C or D teams in terms of level of play.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the point is that it isn’t cheap. Even $3.5k is double what most are paying for that level of soccer (C and D level at big clubs, which is the appropriate level outside of the 3 or 4 teams club wide that are at a higher level than that, from results).

What does “paying for that level of soccer” mean? If it means paying for high quality dedicated professional coaches and fantastic facilities? Then yes. If you mean paying for wins or climbing some perceived ladder, then we are talking different languages.

It means that those teams, other than the few boys teams that play a bit better, are roughly equivalent to Loudoun or Arlington's C or D teams in terms of level of play.

And you don’t think the bottom line for those Loudoun parents is not $3000 after being nickle and dimed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the point is that it isn’t cheap. Even $3.5k is double what most are paying for that level of soccer (C and D level at big clubs, which is the appropriate level outside of the 3 or 4 teams club wide that are at a higher level than that, from results).

What does “paying for that level of soccer” mean? If it means paying for high quality dedicated professional coaches and fantastic facilities? Then yes. If you mean paying for wins or climbing some perceived ladder, then we are talking different languages.

It means that those teams, other than the few boys teams that play a bit better, are roughly equivalent to Loudoun or Arlington's C or D teams in terms of level of play.

And you don’t think the bottom line for those Loudoun parents is not $3000 after being nickle and dimed?

We had a child who played on a big club C team and, no, they were not "nickled and dimed" up to $3k. Other than a $100 fee for tournament costs, there were no other costs charged beyond the club fee. And Loudoun/Arlington are probably the most expensive examples, other clubs are less expensive at this playing level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

That's a fair point, although I don't know where the other thread is. However, the subject doesn't belong here by any means. Barca plays in EDP which has relegation and promotion anyways.

Use the search feature to find the thread. If it doesn’t exist then start a new thread but don’t hijack a thread with an off topic subject because you do t know how to search or click a button.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/jforum.page?module=search&action=search&search_keywords=pro%2Frel&match_type=any&search_forum=&sort_by=relevance

Pick your thread. There are over 60k references to pro/rel on this forum. There was a lengthy discussion in the CCL/NPL thread that I think was the proxy for the pro/rel debate.

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

Pro/rel in *youth* soccer? I missed that one, but I'd gladly go to it.

I think it beats having 10-0 blowouts across the board because teams aren't competing at the right level.

Except for the fact that getting blown out 10-0 is exactly how a team gets relegated and blowing teams out 10-0 is how the other team gets promoted.

That's kind of the point. Unless you're in the DA and have nowhere else to go.

Back to Barca -- I think one of their EDP teams is going to be relegated. Which is fine.

Which team is being relegated?

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

Pro/rel in *youth* soccer? I missed that one, but I'd gladly go to it.

I think it beats having 10-0 blowouts across the board because teams aren't competing at the right level.

Except for the fact that getting blown out 10-0 is exactly how a team gets relegated and blowing teams out 10-0 is how the other team gets promoted.

That's kind of the point. Unless you're in the DA and have nowhere else to go.

Back to Barca -- I think one of their EDP teams is going to be relegated. Which is fine.

Which team is being relegated?

Unless EDP has no actual pro/rel, then it'd be the one that has lost all seven games and scored only twice:

http://events.gotsport.com/events/results.aspx?EventID=67069&Gender=Boys&Age=14

I dunno...we played their U13 boys and crushed them... (and we are a middling ncsl team)

[Anonymous]

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

Pro/rel in *youth* soccer? I missed that one, but I'd gladly go to it.

I think it beats having 10-0 blowouts across the board because teams aren't competing at the right level.

Except for the fact that getting blown out 10-0 is exactly how a team gets relegated and blowing teams out 10-0 is how the other team gets promoted.

That's kind of the point. Unless you're in the DA and have nowhere else to go.

Back to Barca -- I think one of their EDP teams is going to be relegated. Which is fine.

Which team is being relegated?

Unless EDP has no actual pro/rel, then it'd be the one that has lost all seven games and scored only twice:

http://events.gotsport.com/events/results.aspx?EventID=67069&Gender=Boys&Age=14

EDP should never have put them in premier I division. The other Barca 2005 yellow team is in Premier IV and is appropriately placed. Won 3 games and most were competitive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

RantingSoccerDad wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of this is interesting but has nothing to do with FCB escola. It’s interesting that it keeps coming up in this head from the perspective of who is peddling it and the agendas target have brought into other threads, but apart from that, I think there was a thread dedicated to the subject where pro/rel posts belong.

Pro/rel in *youth* soccer? I missed that one, but I'd gladly go to it.

I think it beats having 10-0 blowouts across the board because teams aren't competing at the right level.

Except for the fact that getting blown out 10-0 is exactly how a team gets relegated and blowing teams out 10-0 is how the other team gets promoted.

That's kind of the point. Unless you're in the DA and have nowhere else to go.

Back to Barca -- I think one of their EDP teams is going to be relegated. Which is fine.

Which team is being relegated?

Unless EDP has no actual pro/rel, then it'd be the one that has lost all seven games and scored only twice:

http://events.gotsport.com/events/results.aspx?EventID=67069&Gender=Boys&Age=14

EDP should never have put them in premier I division. The other Barca 2005 yellow team is in Premier IV and is appropriately placed. Won 3 games and most were competitive.

EDP has promotion/relegation so this team will be moved to a division that is more appropriate for them. I agree that this was a tough division for their first competitive season. To provide some context, No. 1 ranked team in Virginia finished 4th in the same division.