Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

She’s too happy in these pics. Manufactured.

[Anonymous]

And yes, people can be happy. That’s manufactured though. Not natural at all.

[Anonymous]

I just want to point out that this is a photo of Lively walking like 20 feet from a building to a car with a neutral but pleasant expression on her face, looking nice but not dressed up, in the city where she lives.

It is the least offensive photo of a person that could possibly exist.

And yet it was posted here for the sole purpose of criticizing her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to point out that this is a photo of Lively walking like 20 feet from a building to a car with a neutral but pleasant expression on her face, looking nice but not dressed up, in the city where she lives.

It is the least offensive photo of a person that could possibly exist.

And yet it was posted here for the sole purpose of criticizing her.

Sorry but I don’t feel sorry for her. She wanted the publicity and probably called the paparazzi and sometimes criticism comes with that. She has done horrible things to a lot of people and continues to do horrible things.

Blake asked for AEO for herself and her information but has allegedly leaked addresses and health information on the Baldoni side. Sarowitz’s family was threatened by a loon and his trash can was set on fire. And other parties on the balcony side have reportedly received threats.

She also filed a sham lawsuit to get a sham subpoena for someone’s private messages and shared those messages in the NYT.

She also had a man criminally prosecuted for what appeared to be trumped up charges that were ultimately dismissed, but not before that man was ruined.

There’s literally nothing you could say to make me feel a shred of sympathy for her until she starts taking accountability for the things she’s done to hurt others.

[Anonymous]

Let’s stick to the case.

[Anonymous]

So Megan twohey isn’t active on Twitter or social media lately? And she hasn’t published since the NYT lively article, right? Other than being on that Daily podcast, has she spoken out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to point out that this is a photo of Lively walking like 20 feet from a building to a car with a neutral but pleasant expression on her face, looking nice but not dressed up, in the city where she lives.

It is the least offensive photo of a person that could possibly exist.

And yet it was posted here for the sole purpose of criticizing her.

Yeah, I don't understand these other posts. This is a normal photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just want to point out that this is a photo of Lively walking like 20 feet from a building to a car with a neutral but pleasant expression on her face, looking nice but not dressed up, in the city where she lives.

It is the least offensive photo of a person that could possibly exist.

And yet it was posted here for the sole purpose of criticizing her.

It's a setup photo so Blake can claim to be "just a regular mom" out on the weekend. She's changing her tactic from dressing in glamorous clothes at movie premieres. She realizes being glamorous and acting carefree is not helping her cause after she and her sexy lover Ryan tried to destroy Baldoni. People are sympathetic to Baldoni because he was a small fish and she and Ryan took over his movie and tried to destroy him.

[Anonymous]

Hint: I don't really think Ryan is sexy. I am being sarcastic.

[Anonymous]

It’s ridiculous to think that Taylor shouldn’t be involved. There is video all over the Internet of Blake saying she was “with me on this movie every step of the way” And gushing about Taylor’s creative involvement.

There’s a video of both Justin and Isabella talking about Taylor’s involvement and casting. And she was absolutely in the apartment for at least one interaction between Ryan, Blake, and Justin where they talked about the movie. Now I strongly believe Blake is a name dropper and a liar and Taylor wasn’t as involved, but it would be silly of Baldoni’s legal team not to find out and to act as if just because she’s really famous and she shouldn’t be involved. That’s not really how it works.

There’s also some speculation that it was Taylor’s idea to do the bread crumbing… Earlier in August when the fat shaming rumors and Justin’s difficulty with the cast started coming out. It would be interesting to see if Blake and Taylor had texts or anything of that nature speaking to that and it would absolutely be relevant to the case.

It’s quite possible those things don’t exist, but I understand why he would be interested in finding out. It would absolutely be relevant to see if Blake lied about Taylor’s involvement too, like Taylor’s team gave the rights to my tears ricochet - if Blake did not have any power or control over removing that song from the movie and she was lying and holding that over wayfarer for leverage, that would absolutely be relevant.

I like Taylor and I wish she wasn’t involved in this, but the fact is Blake involved her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s ridiculous to think that Taylor shouldn’t be involved. There is video all over the Internet of Blake saying she was “with me on this movie every step of the way” And gushing about Taylor’s creative involvement.

There’s a video of both Justin and Isabella talking about Taylor’s involvement and casting. And she was absolutely in the apartment for at least one interaction between Ryan, Blake, and Justin where they talked about the movie. Now I strongly believe Blake is a name dropper and a liar and Taylor wasn’t as involved, but it would be silly of Baldoni’s legal team not to find out and to act as if just because she’s really famous and she shouldn’t be involved. That’s not really how it works.

There’s also some speculation that it was Taylor’s idea to do the bread crumbing… Earlier in August when the fat shaming rumors and Justin’s difficulty with the cast started coming out. It would be interesting to see if Blake and Taylor had texts or anything of that nature speaking to that and it would absolutely be relevant to the case.

It’s quite possible those things don’t exist, but I understand why he would be interested in finding out. It would absolutely be relevant to see if Blake lied about Taylor’s involvement too, like Taylor’s team gave the rights to my tears ricochet - if Blake did not have any power or control over removing that song from the movie and she was lying and holding that over wayfarer for leverage, that would absolutely be relevant.

I like Taylor and I wish she wasn’t involved in this, but the fact is Blake involved her.

I agree and also like Taylor. I think her statement took shots at both Blake and Justin as a way of trying to stay neutral. She basically called Blake a liar but also took a dig at Justin when she said the subpoena was clickbait. I’m team Justin and don’t agree it’s clickbait but I think Taylor was trying not to piss off either side’s supporters by giving each a little something.

I tend to think Taylor perhaps knew about the Doe lawsuit and that’s why she’s never come out supporting Blake, even in those first few days following the nyt article when everyone was supporting Blake. I’d bet Taylor’s lawyers told her your friend is doing some really shady sugar honey iced tea and you need to stay far away from this mess.

[Anonymous]

This just queued on my radio. Fitting:

'Cause, baby, now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look what you've done
'Cause, baby, now we got bad blood
Hey
Now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And, baby, now we got bad blood
Hey

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This just queued on my radio. Fitting:

'Cause, baby, now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look what you've done
'Cause, baby, now we got bad blood
Hey
Now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And, baby, now we got bad blood
Hey

In Taylor's world it's cool when you sing about "Bad Blood" as stylized bop for angsty Millenials. It might not be so cool in real life when she has to swear an oath and explain her actions in court. Poor Tay.

This puts a whole new spin on Ryan Reynolds "I want to die" expressions in photos at Tay's Fourth of July party in Rhode Island. He knew the Taylor thing would not end well for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This just queued on my radio. Fitting:

'Cause, baby, now we got bad blood
You know it used to be mad love
So take a look what you've done
'Cause, baby, now we got bad blood
Hey
Now we got problems
And I don't think we can solve them
You made a really deep cut
And, baby, now we got bad blood
Hey

In Taylor's world it's cool when you sing about "Bad Blood" as stylized bop for angsty Millenials. It might not be so cool in real life when she has to swear an oath and explain her actions in court. Poor Tay.

This puts a whole new spin on Ryan Reynolds "I want to die" expressions in photos at Tay's Fourth of July party in Rhode Island. He knew the Taylor thing would not end well for him.

This mess will definitely end up in a song!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s ridiculous to think that Taylor shouldn’t be involved. There is video all over the Internet of Blake saying she was “with me on this movie every step of the way” And gushing about Taylor’s creative involvement.

There’s a video of both Justin and Isabella talking about Taylor’s involvement and casting. And she was absolutely in the apartment for at least one interaction between Ryan, Blake, and Justin where they talked about the movie. Now I strongly believe Blake is a name dropper and a liar and Taylor wasn’t as involved, but it would be silly of Baldoni’s legal team not to find out and to act as if just because she’s really famous and she shouldn’t be involved. That’s not really how it works.

There’s also some speculation that it was Taylor’s idea to do the bread crumbing… Earlier in August when the fat shaming rumors and Justin’s difficulty with the cast started coming out. It would be interesting to see if Blake and Taylor had texts or anything of that nature speaking to that and it would absolutely be relevant to the case.

It’s quite possible those things don’t exist, but I understand why he would be interested in finding out. It would absolutely be relevant to see if Blake lied about Taylor’s involvement too, like Taylor’s team gave the rights to my tears ricochet - if Blake did not have any power or control over removing that song from the movie and she was lying and holding that over wayfarer for leverage, that would absolutely be relevant.

I like Taylor and I wish she wasn’t involved in this, but the fact is Blake involved her.

I agree and also like Taylor. I think her statement took shots at both Blake and Justin as a way of trying to stay neutral. She basically called Blake a liar but also took a dig at Justin when she said the subpoena was clickbait. I’m team Justin and don’t agree it’s clickbait but I think Taylor was trying not to piss off either side’s supporters by giving each a little something.

I tend to think Taylor perhaps knew about the Doe lawsuit and that’s why she’s never come out supporting Blake, even in those first few days following the nyt article when everyone was supporting Blake. I’d bet Taylor’s lawyers told her your friend is doing some really shady sugar honey iced tea and you need to stay far away from this mess.

I would argue that she’s not exactly staying neutral… Of course she’s not going to want to be in this so she’s going to pushback on Justin’s lawyers, but it speaks volumes that she didn’t have something like “though I support my friend Blake…I was busy touring and not involved.” And included the dig about not seeing the movie for weeks.

It really goes beyond neutral for Blake and I just don’t see how this friendship survives.

Given Blake’s girls are her godchildren I would be surprised if she does anything obvious in a song etc….its more likely she just permanently separates herself from Blake and Ryan and doesn’t make a thing of it.