Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s ridiculous to think that Taylor shouldn’t be involved. There is video all over the Internet of Blake saying she was “with me on this movie every step of the way” And gushing about Taylor’s creative involvement. There’s a video of both Justin and Isabella talking about Taylor’s involvement and casting. And she was absolutely in the apartment for at least one interaction between Ryan, Blake, and Justin where they talked about the movie. Now I strongly believe Blake is a name dropper and a liar and Taylor wasn’t as involved, but it would be silly of Baldoni’s legal team not to find out and to act as if just because she’s really famous and she shouldn’t be involved. That’s not really how it works. There’s also some speculation that it was Taylor’s idea to do the bread crumbing… Earlier in August when the fat shaming rumors and Justin’s difficulty with the cast started coming out. It would be interesting to see if Blake and Taylor had texts or anything of that nature speaking to that and it would absolutely be relevant to the case. It’s quite possible those things don’t exist, but I understand why he would be interested in finding out. It would absolutely be relevant to see if Blake lied about Taylor’s involvement too, like Taylor’s team gave the rights to my tears ricochet - if Blake did not have any power or control over removing that song from the movie and she was lying and holding that over wayfarer for leverage, that would absolutely be relevant. I like Taylor and I wish she wasn’t involved in this, but the fact is Blake involved her. [/quote] I agree and also like Taylor. I think her statement took shots at both Blake and Justin as a way of trying to stay neutral. She basically called Blake a liar but also took a dig at Justin when she said the subpoena was clickbait. I’m team Justin and don’t agree it’s clickbait but I think Taylor was trying not to piss off either side’s supporters by giving each a little something. I tend to think Taylor perhaps knew about the Doe lawsuit and that’s why she’s never come out supporting Blake, even in those first few days following the nyt article when everyone was supporting Blake. I’d bet Taylor’s lawyers told her your friend is doing some really shady sugar honey iced tea and you need to stay far away from this mess.[/quote] I would argue that she’s not exactly staying neutral… Of course she’s not going to want to be in this so she’s going to pushback on Justin’s lawyers, but it speaks volumes that she didn’t have something like “though I support my friend Blake…I was busy touring and not involved.” And included the dig about not seeing the movie for weeks. It really goes beyond neutral for Blake and I just don’t see how this friendship survives. Given Blake’s girls are her godchildren I would be surprised if she does anything obvious in a song etc….its more likely she just permanently separates herself from Blake and Ryan and doesn’t make a thing of it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics