Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Who told you about the 62,000 new requests?

Turning Point trying to stay relevant and keep up the grift.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Yup.

This is funny. To quiet conspiracy theorists, they’re suggesting he was super human. lol

LOL…..yea, you can’t make this stuff up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

Must be the bot army signing up.

Bots have been busy:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

It’s because the people who support this idiotic bs are the ones that want to keep “the movement” alive,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

And Trump is giving him the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Yup.

Holy crap, this tweet by TPUSA only raises more questions!

-Did they actually recover the bullet? If so, where was it found?
-Was an autopsy performed by the local medical examiner?
-Was the body released to the family? After how long? Who took control of the body at the hospital?

When the first video came out of the shooting, it looked like he was hit in the chest. Then the more graphic up close video was released a short time later that showed the massive outward blood loss from the neck & everyone assumed he was shot in the neck

Personally, I’m inclined to believe that it was a chest hit into soft body armor. This cause the bullet to shrapnel and tumble inside his body. A piece of the bullet exited his neck from inside his body. This make the most sense to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

Trump and his followers love it because Epstein has been off the front page! Also, trump.loves the idea of being a martyr but doesn't want to die to become a martyr. With Kirk, Trump experiences martyrdom vicariously through Kirk. Also, some unexpected benefits. Erika Kirk is young, blonde, and pretty and Trump gets to hug her. A pervert takes advantage of all opportunities.

I just pray that the goon squad will not murder protesters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

Must be the bot army signing up.

Bots have been busy:

Truly scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Yup.

Holy crap, this tweet by TPUSA only raises more questions!

-Did they actually recover the bullet? If so, where was it found?
-Was an autopsy performed by the local medical examiner?
-Was the body released to the family? After how long? Who took control of the body at the hospital?

When the first video came out of the shooting, it looked like he was hit in the chest. Then the more graphic up close video was released a short time later that showed the massive outward blood loss from the neck & everyone assumed he was shot in the neck

Personally, I’m inclined to believe that it was a chest hit into soft body armor. This cause the bullet to shrapnel and tumble inside his body. A piece of the bullet exited his neck from inside his body. This make the most sense to me.

These and so many other reasons this needs to go to trial. There is a lot of dirt to be sifted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

His murder was horrific, criminal and wrong.

But the right wing's attempt to canonize him is just plain wrong. He was no saint or great savior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Yeah. It’s been proven that debate only makes people dig into their already held beliefs, evidence be damned.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Ok, good luck with that.

As long as they don’t become mandatory like some other youth clubs 85 or so years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

Trump and his followers love it because Epstein has been off the front page! Also, trump.loves the idea of being a martyr but doesn't want to die to become a martyr. With Kirk, Trump experiences martyrdom vicariously through Kirk. Also, some unexpected benefits. Erika Kirk is young, blonde, and pretty and Trump gets to hug her. A pervert takes advantage of all opportunities.

I just pray that the goon squad will not murder protesters.

Well said