Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At first I thought the shooting of Charlie Kirk was the Reichstag Fire event that the right wing was looking for, but now it seems like it's already starting to fizzle.

Sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comedy gold.

I don’t find anything humorous about the execution of an innocent person in front of millions of people

The humor is not the murder of Charlie Kirk. It’s the unusual language choices and detailed text content of the 22 year old perpetrator, who supposedly confessed all…in writing…”my love.” (I, too, am a 22 year old Antifa, and it is just my way to call people “my love.”)

PP (and the rest of MAGA) can’t understand the difference between making fun of CK’s death making a fun of their laughable reaction to the whole thing. They lack reasoning skills. This is why Kimmel got suspended…that and the poorly veiled threats against ABC.

+1

Which is why support Trump in the first place. Fvking idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comedy gold.

I don’t find anything humorous about the execution of an innocent person in front of millions of people

The humor is not the murder of Charlie Kirk. It’s the unusual language choices and detailed text content of the 22 year old perpetrator, who supposedly confessed all…in writing…”my love.” (I, too, am a 22 year old Antifa, and it is just my way to call people “my love.”)

PP (and the rest of MAGA) can’t understand the difference between making fun of CK’s death making a fun of their laughable reaction to the whole thing. They lack reasoning skills. This is why Kimmel got suspended…that and the poorly veiled threats against ABC.

📴: Correction: According to Donald Trump, Kimmel was NOT fired because of what he said on Monday’s show….he was fired because he has no talent.

Donald Trump admitted this was why he was suspended.
Which totally differs and contradicts the reasons given to us by ABC/FCC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At first I thought the shooting of Charlie Kirk was the Reichstag Fire event that the right wing was looking for, but now it seems like it's already starting to fizzle.

Sure.

You’re kind of proving PP’s point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Truly disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Comedy gold.

I don’t find anything humorous about the execution of an innocent person in front of millions of people

The humor is not the murder of Charlie Kirk. It’s the unusual language choices and detailed text content of the 22 year old perpetrator, who supposedly confessed all…in writing…”my love.” (I, too, am a 22 year old Antifa, and it is just my way to call people “my love.”)

PP (and the rest of MAGA) can’t understand the difference between making fun of CK’s death making a fun of their laughable reaction to the whole thing. They lack reasoning skills. This is why Kimmel got suspended…that and the poorly veiled threats against ABC.

📴: Correction: According to Donald Trump, Kimmel was NOT fired because of what he said on Monday’s show….he was fired because he has no talent.

Donald Trump admitted this was why he was suspended.
Which totally differs and contradicts the reasons given to us by ABC/FCC.

As we all know...

Trump is a big fat fvking liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Lack of an exit wound?

Sometimes you don’t get an exit wound.


But there was something like a dark straight line that was opposite of the neck wound. Not sure if it was the bullet and the neck wound was the exit wound or it was one of his hairs or a spurt of blood from the impact.

Not to be graphic but a bullet that size would create an explosive wound. This is a type of bullet that can partially decapitate a deer. I've read a lot of comments from hunters and those in the military and they aren't buying this story. Plus the wound on the neck looks like an exit wound not an entry.

Not necessarily.

I found another clip on 4chan and in it you can see the sunlight reflect off bullet right before he gets hit. It hit him in the back of his head/neck.

The neck wound I believe is the exit wound. Based upon seeing that second video clip.



Scroll down to the “bright light exiting from his eyes” post.


https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/516762412


In regards to the type of damage, it may depend on what type of bullet it was (did it have a hollow shell etc) and what it hit plus the velocity when it first made impact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Who told you about the 62,000 new requests?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Blah blah blah. Fake stats to embezzle more donation money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why so much fuss over such an inconsequential person who will be forgotten in six months?

This is why you folks keep losing.

They just don't get it do they?

I think the previous poster means Tyler Robinson. It's pretty clear that Charlie Kirk is not inconsequential nor will he be forgotten in six months.

I think you are wrong. I think the pp was indeed talking about Charlie Kirk and has no earthly idea just how consequential his life was. He will not be forgotten in 6 months, or 6 years or 20 years. And, this terrifies them.

Do you know who George Lincoln Rockwell was, poster?

Bumping this; curious to know if anybody here remembers George Lincoln Rockwell.

No

Well then, I wonder if anybody will really remember Charlie Kirk in 20 years.

Maybe because of the internet, but on the other hand, new content is always being made and it pushes the old content out of the spotlight.

TPUSA board has named Erika Kirk as her husband's successor, and she says she plans to visit college campuses and continue his debate shtick. From what I've seen of her, I doubt very much she'll be any good at it.

Many people had no idea who Charlie and Erika Kirk were to begin with. Will I remember him in 20 years, maybe. Probably not though.

Most older folks didn't know Charlie, unless they are very close political news followers like myself - and I only knew about him enough to know that I didn't want to know more, same as I feel about Ben Shapiro.

But if you're following the news at all, you might have seen that his reach to the youth of America and other countries was very expansive - like, most corporations would only wish to have the percentage name recognition of Charlie Kirk among high school and college age youth. Your kids if they're old enough have probably seen Kirk's content at one point or another.

Going to keep posting this to tell you all that he really wasn’t as well known and influential as you think he was.

Turning Point currently has about 3500 chapters at high schools and universities. Since his murder, they have received 62,000 requests to open new chapters. His influence is only growing.

Pure fiction. There aren't even 62,000 high schools (including public and private), colleges and universities total in the entire US to begin with for that many to have "requested new TPUSA chapters."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This entire thing is a circus.

Yup.

This is funny. To quiet conspiracy theorists, they’re suggesting he was super human. lol

[Anonymous]

Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obviously his murder was a horrible act by a terrible person. But can someone please explain to me why someone who said the civil rights act was a mistake, women should submit to their husbands, and gay people should be stoned is being remembered as a good guy? I do not get it. I don’t think anyone has explained this. Only mourning his loss and wanting to keep his “movement” alive.

He who pays the piper calls the tune.

Kirk was funded by wealthy, old white conservatives. Many of who personally remember segregation and liked it.

Go look at TPUSA’s non profit filings. His biggest donors are old retirees.

Young men dying for wars waged by old men. Come on down, Charlie Kirk.