Can we boycott Georgia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What this is really about is Stacey Abrams needs mail in ballots without signature verification to win.

Thus, anyone opposing this must be a Jimmy eagle racist.

The only reason she didn't win last time is because the former Secretary of State, who also happened to be the GOP Gubinatorial candidate, rigged the election in his favor. Fact is, she can win in a fair election. Play by the 2018 or 2020 rules, she will win. With these new rules in place, where the state can subsume county officials, the GOP will simply run roughshod over the process.

This is the biggest crock of poo and a lie propagated by Stacey Abrams because she lost. Yet, never conceded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Make the voting easy and accessible so the lines are short enough for people not to need food and water. Duh. If that’s what they are really concerned about. But they just don’t want people to vote. Making it hard and arduous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

There's plenty of things people don't "need." Is that the new standard did making something illegal? I thought I lived in a free country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Make the voting easy and accessible so the lines are short enough for people not to need food and water. Duh. If that’s what they are really concerned about. But they just don’t want people to vote. Making it hard and arduous.

Have you even read the bill?

It does that.

https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/bill-takes-aim-long-lines-election-day-georgia/vs2a3q9pj15G7FstUPVzaL/
https://apnews.com/article/dc53d5541937b71325a3f3582837b243
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/secretary_of_state_brad_raffensperger_takes_legislative_hatchet_to_long_voter_lines

[Anonymous]

The solution is simple: vote in person with a valid ID in the next several GA state elections and vote the bums out of office. Then change the laws back and include laws on statistical anomaly controls on individual voting machines in certain precincts (which is how Kemp was fraudulently elected in the first place).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

There's plenty of things people don't "need." Is that the new standard did making something illegal? I thought I lived in a free country.

DP.
Please. Other states have similar laws. It is all about preventing electioneering. They can set up water stations if they so desire...... perfectly legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

There's plenty of things people don't "need." Is that the new standard did making something illegal? I thought I lived in a free country.

DP.
Please. Other states have similar laws. It is all about preventing electioneering. They can set up water stations if they so desire...... perfectly legal.

No they can't. A poll officer can. Have you actually read the bill?

There's also zero evidence of electioneering by providing water and it's very easy to draft a law that permits giving water by people who aren't electioneering (New York's law would pretty clearly allow water distributed by unmarked volunteers). Any states with similar blanket bans like Georgia should repeal them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.

Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Make the voting easy and accessible so the lines are short enough for people not to need food and water. Duh. If that’s what they are really concerned about. But they just don’t want people to vote. Making it hard and arduous.

PP here. Except for those with obvious disabilities and infirmaties, people are fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.

Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.

7 hrs where?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

I should have the FREEDOM to given food and water because this is America and the government should butt out. Isn’t that what your people say when it is convenient for them? If I should not be told when or how to mask, then logic follows the government should not dictate who can give me food and drink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.

Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.

+1

What I see here and some people who do not have empathy and can’t put themselves in another person’s shoes either due to lack of imagination or due to malice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If EVERYBODY in line is offered food and water; ie not singling out one side or another, then there is no partisan offering in exchange for a vote.

People do not need to be given food and water as they wait to vote.

Clearly you have never stood in a line for 7+ hours to vote.

Others have. Understand, people are put through hardships just to be able to exercise their unaleinable right to vote.

7 hrs where?

Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina just to name a few over past cycles...seriously you don't know this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Good!!!!!