True. |
That’s fine. Just keep in mind that most men don’t mind financially supporting a woman. Men who you regard as your “equal” are rare and in a position to be choosy. And men care way less about a woman’s earning potential. That’s why you see much older men (with money/good jobs) with younger women and rarely the other way around. |
That’s what I thought in my 20s/30s but I remarried anyway -twice. And by the way, most women in this country, especially past 40, need to ‘lose a few pounds’ (and won’t). It’s just a question of how many so you better be cool with it. |
I disagree based on experience. I choose not to date 20year olds because they don’t appeal to me- not a child Molester. I prefer to sleep with men. The reason you don’t see women dating poor guys 20 years their senior is because we don’t want to. I think marriages or relationships between equals are not as rare as you’d think. I’d wonder if most agree with you that divorced fathers raising kids on their own don’t mind supporting a new dependent (they’re already paying alimony and CS) I would. My kids come first. He’s going to be able to pull his own weight to consider someone actual relationship weight. |
Better than being a pain in the ass like most women I suppose. |
I think it's the men who need to be in a relationship more than vice versa. My mom dated after my dad passed away but just didn't want to end up having to cook/clean etc. for someone else again and so never remarried. She's financially independent, socially active, and still dresses up/puts on make up/looks fashionable but didn't need to be married/partnered to just be in a relationship again. Men need a relationship and so will put up with what you would call "pain in the ass women". BTW, if you think women are pain the ass, you should remain alone. You'll be happier that way. |
That's my point. I've learned that I don't have to be cool with it, especially when I'm not treated any better by those women. I can simply opt out, which I will do. |
OP here. Thank you for this! That is encouraging. |
Ouch. |
Depends on how flexible you are in terms of who you find attractive and "good". If you're willing to get online and you aren't too hung up on finding that unicorn guy (tall, dark, handsome, makes lots of money) you might do just fine.
You'll probably have to kiss some frogs first though. Most of us have had to put up with some pretty bad dates. I have a lot of 40+ friends and looks do make it easier to get attention from men, but don't seem to be the dividing factor in actually finding/keeping one. Some of my least physically attractive friends (or the plainer ones) seem to be in the happiest relationships. |
Could you image if a man had this attitude. I wonder if the poster would marry a man who was significantly out earned her? |
what is your definition of "a good man?"
|
It may feel like you are making a choice, but it’s biology. Women generally are wired to heavily weigh a man’s status and ability to provide. That’s why you aren’t interested in young men. That’s why you want your equal. Men are different. They are wired to seek fertility and a nurturing personality. Most men don’t expect to marry their socioeconomic “equal.” |
Of course she would. |
No one has a good idea on how much of this behavior is driven by biology vs. conditioning. Let's not state things as fact when they are assumptions. Women over the next several generations will behave differently than those in the past as more women work and study and earn a wage to live independently. Many men here already say that they would never marry someone who is a SAHM divorced woman because of financial/other reasons. Money is a factor for many men as well. Your opinions on these matters are not scientific fact. |