I agree with all of this. But if she thought it was cool to hang out with a musician at the time, then she doesn't get to go back now, 20 years later, and say he was a creeper. There's enough denial of women and girl's agency on this forum. She doesn't need to do it to herself, too. |
| I think she's rewriting history in the framework of me too. I mean, she did sign the infamous forgive Polanski letter. |
It’s hollywood and rock stars, they all have more sexual partners than dates. Don’t be so naive. |
i am cracking up at this!!!
the angles even! |
I think his getting her age wrong was purposeful, and not because those years are interchangeable. Look at what she actually says: “I was surprised to hear that he characterised the very short time that I knew him as dating because my recollection is a much older man being creepy with me when I just had graduated high school,” Portman told us. “He said I was 20; I definitely wasn’t. I was a teenager. I had just turned 18. There was no fact checking from him or his publisher – it almost feels deliberate. That he used this story to sell his book was very disturbing to me. It wasn’t the case. There are many factual errors and inventions. I would have liked him or his publisher to reach out to fact check.” Even when he pushed back with the photo, he put her age wrong, when that is verifiable. Who's the unreliable narrator, here? He also called her interview part of "gossip." She spoke directly, on the record, to Harper's Bazaar. When I was looking for her quote, I found this on Lainey Gossip, which must have been reading my mind (and many others). https://www.laineygossip.com/natalie-portman-denies-mobys-claims-that-the-two-dated-in-his-new-memoir/55723 |
| “She says”? Sweetie, everything she “said” was curated and blasted by a multi-million PR agency. Bless your heart for being so naive. Her career has stalled and she’s embarrassed about her younger self’s rave attending and dating history as she tries to segue into some wannabe perfect mother Gwyneth Paltrow lane. |
This is it. Nothing more or less. He used the story to sell the book. |
|
It comes down to
He said they “dated.” She says they didn’t “date.” Honestly not many people care whether or not they did or didn’t. I’m into celebrity news, and this really doesn’t affect what I think of him or her. |
Yep. Also, I wouldn't have known that Moby has a new book out if Natalie Portman hadn't gotten outraged about it. So there's that. |
|
He said he "tried to be her boyfriend." That's not the same as dating someone.
I'm so disappointed. I LOVE his music. |
|
I'm not a Natalie Portman fan (nor a Moby fan) but I still believe her side.
I've had instances where I've been friendly with a guy to the point where in his mind we were dating. I also see "Throwback Thursday!" photos posted on Facebook and Instagram of me smiling with my rapist back in college. Most photos are from before the rape but some are from after, also no one posting those pics knows what happened. I'd hope that if I said something now that they wouldn't pull these photos out as proof that nothing happened since I was smiling in them. |
| Weaponizing MeToo to rewrite your embarrassing dating and partying history. What a class act. |
| Ugh this is how I felt when I learned Ryan Adams is a d-bag too. |
+1. I agree with the Jessica Goldstein piece on Lainey Gossip. |
"There is still, possibly, a way to salvage this, by demonstrating growth, as several men in the wake of the #MeToo movement have done. Instead, he posted a picture on Instagram that he thought constituted “proof” of his version of events but only made him look worse, what with him being shirtless and Natalie looking extremely young and not exactly comfortable (every woman will recognize that I’m-smiling-until-this-man-stops-touching-me expression on her face)" |