Makes no sense. Get the paperwork that was submitted, and see if you can figure out what went wrong. It’s certainly not the scores. |
NNAT: 118
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) - 119 / 129 / 131 -- Composite - 130 GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) - 2 Frequent, 2 Consistent In-Pool: (Y/N) - N Parent Referral: (Y/N) - Yes WISC: N AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN) - IN! We were very pleasantly surprised by the results. Were not expecting it. Suspect that excellent GBRS commentary by the teacher and 2 letters of recommendation carried DC through. |
NNAT: 149
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 133/132/133/138 GBRS: Don’t Know In-Pool: Yes Parent Referral: Questionnaire only, no samples or recommendations WISC: No Zip Code: AAP Decision: IN |
2nd this Also check to make sure the scores are submitted correctly. Advise you to post in a new thread and keep us updated. Those scores should be IN |
This is bizarre...based on scores alone you should have been in-pool. Talk to your Resource teacher at your school |
Ok is anyone getting the sense that some of these file reviewers were drunk or high? I have never seen so many high scores rejected. |
It seems like a ton of weight was given to the teacher rec, which really disadvantages kids with new teachers or teachers who couldn’t care less. |
Agree. This is crazy-making. |
Why are you not in the pool? Non-FCPS? Really sorry, those are good scores. |
Every year, there are a few of these. This year appears to be a bit higher than usual. |
NNAT: 114 COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 120/135/120/130 GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) m In-Pool: (Y/N) Y Parent Referral: (Y/N) Y WISC: - Zip Code: 22306 AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN) IN |
NNAT: 133
COGAT: (V / Q / NV / Composite) 132 GBRS: (#Consistent / #Frequent / #Occasional) Don't know In-Pool: (Y/N) Yes Parent Referral: (Y/N) Letter only WISC: No AAP Decision: (IN / NOT IN) NOT IN |
NNAT 137
COGAT 130 In pool: Yes AAP decision: NOT IN |
My friends dd got in with no in pool scores-Highest score was a 122. 1 C and 3 Fs. Not in the highest reading group. |
Seriously doubt this ![]() |