Prince Charles' 70th Birthday family Portraits

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually think Kate’s dress is cute. I like polka dots, though. I think the collar is what is freaking everybody out. But Duggarish? Nope.

Why would an official portrait of the royal family on The birthday or the future king include kids he didn’t raise/nonroyals? That makes no sense.

If you’re gonna get nasty about the arms, I noticed Charlotte’s arms are looking pretty bare. That trollap. /s

I could have typed what you said too. But I like Kate’s dress even more. It’s just a “look.” And she wears it well. The other lady who wore it had an even more retro look with the same dress, I think bc of the hair up and/or gloves or something. Can’t remember.

Abigail Spencer, Meghan's former "Suits" co-star wore the same dress. I think Kate looks lovely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love the pictures. Kate's dress is horrifying. I didn't know you could channel the Duggars for $1200.

Agreed. She looks a frumpy mess.

Let's see you post your picture, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan seems like a try hard. Relax girl, you already bagged the prince.

That’s what it is! I always could see something and this is what it is - she’s not relaxed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually think Kate’s dress is cute. I like polka dots, though. I think the collar is what is freaking everybody out. But Duggarish? Nope.

Why would an official portrait of the royal family on The birthday or the future king include kids he didn’t raise/nonroyals? That makes no sense.

If you’re gonna get nasty about the arms, I noticed Charlotte’s arms are looking pretty bare. That trollap. /s

I could have typed what you said too. But I like Kate’s dress even more. It’s just a “look.” And she wears it well. The other lady who wore it had an even more retro look with the same dress, I think bc of the hair up and/or gloves or something. Can’t remember.

Abigail Spencer, Meghan's former "Suits" co-star wore the same dress. I think Kate looks lovely.

I bet kate’s Has more buttons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually think Kate’s dress is cute. I like polka dots, though. I think the collar is what is freaking everybody out. But Duggarish? Nope.

Why would an official portrait of the royal family on The birthday or the future king include kids he didn’t raise/nonroyals? That makes no sense.

If you’re gonna get nasty about the arms, I noticed Charlotte’s arms are looking pretty bare. That trollap. /s

I could have typed what you said too. But I like Kate’s dress even more. It’s just a “look.” And she wears it well. The other lady who wore it had an even more retro look with the same dress, I think bc of the hair up and/or gloves or something. Can’t remember.

Abigail Spencer, Meghan's former "Suits" co-star wore the same dress. I think Kate looks lovely.

I bet kate’s Has more buttons.

I forgot how awful Priyanka’s outfit was. Shudder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually think Kate’s dress is cute. I like polka dots, though. I think the collar is what is freaking everybody out. But Duggarish? Nope.

Why would an official portrait of the royal family on The birthday or the future king include kids he didn’t raise/nonroyals? That makes no sense.

If you’re gonna get nasty about the arms, I noticed Charlotte’s arms are looking pretty bare. That trollap. /s

I could have typed what you said too. But I like Kate’s dress even more. It’s just a “look.” And she wears it well. The other lady who wore it had an even more retro look with the same dress, I think bc of the hair up and/or gloves or something. Can’t remember.

Abigail Spencer, Meghan's former "Suits" co-star wore the same dress. I think Kate looks lovely.

I bet kate’s Has more buttons.

I forgot how awful Priyanka’s outfit was. Shudder.

Both of these are hideous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually think Kate’s dress is cute. I like polka dots, though. I think the collar is what is freaking everybody out. But Duggarish? Nope.

Why would an official portrait of the royal family on The birthday or the future king include kids he didn’t raise/nonroyals? That makes no sense.

If you’re gonna get nasty about the arms, I noticed Charlotte’s arms are looking pretty bare. That trollap. /s

I could have typed what you said too. But I like Kate’s dress even more. It’s just a “look.” And she wears it well. The other lady who wore it had an even more retro look with the same dress, I think bc of the hair up and/or gloves or something. Can’t remember.

Abigail Spencer, Meghan's former "Suits" co-star wore the same dress. I think Kate looks lovely.

I bet kate’s Has more buttons.

I forgot how awful Priyanka’s outfit was. Shudder.

Both of these are hideous.

Well, we still have Priyanka’s wedding to look forward to! I’m sure it will be over the top (tacky....)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Beautiful pictures and everyone looks wonderful. I'm sure there are other pictures out there with Cam's side of the family but why would they be released to the press? Cam's kids are private citizens. No need to release a family picture with them.

Diana would love to see this.

Um, I am not pretending to know her mind, but I am fairly certain that Diana would not "love" a picture of her ex husband's long term affair partner posing with her children and snuggling with her grandchildren.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Beautiful pictures and everyone looks wonderful. I'm sure there are other pictures out there with Cam's side of the family but why would they be released to the press? Cam's kids are private citizens. No need to release a family picture with them.

Diana would love to see this.

Um, I am not pretending to know her mind, but I am fairly certain that Diana would not "love" a picture of her ex husband's long term affair partner posing with her children and snuggling with her grandchildren.

Yeah - that caught my attention too. Diana would not love that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Beautiful pictures and everyone looks wonderful. I'm sure there are other pictures out there with Cam's side of the family but why would they be released to the press? Cam's kids are private citizens. No need to release a family picture with them.

Diana would love to see this.

Um, I am not pretending to know her mind, but I am fairly certain that Diana would not "love" a picture of her ex husband's long term affair partner posing with her children and snuggling with her grandchildren.

Yeah - that caught my attention too. Diana would not love that.

okay, okay...you are right about that one. But I do believe she would love to see a family picture of her sons, their wives and children! That's the part she would love to see.

Although, I think had she lived, Charles and Camilla would still have married and it wouldn't bother Diana as much. JMO.

[Anonymous]

So sad Diana isn’t there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is it always the women who are torn apart for their appearance? Prince Charles has always had sausage fingers, yet no one ever seems to notice.

I have actually noticed this for years. You are right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually think Kate’s dress is cute. I like polka dots, though. I think the collar is what is freaking everybody out. But Duggarish? Nope.

Why would an official portrait of the royal family on The birthday or the future king include kids he didn’t raise/nonroyals? That makes no sense.

If you’re gonna get nasty about the arms, I noticed Charlotte’s arms are looking pretty bare. That trollap. /s

I could have typed what you said too. But I like Kate’s dress even more. It’s just a “look.” And she wears it well. The other lady who wore it had an even more retro look with the same dress, I think bc of the hair up and/or gloves or something. Can’t remember.

Abigail Spencer, Meghan's former "Suits" co-star wore the same dress. I think Kate looks lovely.

The dress is ugly no matter who wears it. Kate herself is lovely, but the dress is like something you would see in a catalog of Duggar clothing.

[Anonymous]

Kate's dress is 1950's housewife-esque. Beyond ugly and far too old for her.

Meghan looks fine. Camilla is in white, too.

They look happy in the second photo, not stuffy and posed, except William. He has the smile he's been taught to use his entire life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So sad Diana isn’t there.

Why would she be there even if she were alive? The fairytale was just that. Camilla would still be next to Prince Charles, not Diana.