Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else troubled by the fact that a PROSECUTOR is picking apart a crime victim and seemingly giving cover to an alleged perpetrator? I suppose it’s not a big deal, but it bugs me. If I were assaulted in Maricopa County next week, I’d feel especially vulnerable thinking she was the one who was supposed to get justice for me.

She was hired to stand in for the Republicans since the Dems made a big issue about the old white men stuff. So of course she's speaking for them. She's not acting as a prosecutor. Her job was to discredit Ford, just as the Dems tried to discredit (I'd say humiliate) Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe women.

No matter what.

I believe the person who has the preponderance of evidence on his or her side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people need to quite calling her a victim. She is an "alleged" victim.

You people need to stop trying to minimize the violence involved in this attack.

Nobody knows if the the alleged attack even happened, so their is no minimization of violence.

According to Kavanaugh, the attack happened, but it was Squi.

[Anonymous]

Let's hope the voters of Maine and Alaska step up against BK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe women.

No matter what.

I believe the person who has the preponderance of evidence on his or her side.

Even if he lies and is evasive about lots of other stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else troubled by the fact that a PROSECUTOR is picking apart a crime victim and seemingly giving cover to an alleged perpetrator? I suppose it’s not a big deal, but it bugs me. If I were assaulted in Maricopa County next week, I’d feel especially vulnerable thinking she was the one who was supposed to get justice for me.

She was hired to stand in for the Republicans since the Dems made a big issue about the old white men stuff. So of course she's speaking for them. She's not acting as a prosecutor. Her job was to discredit Ford, just as the Dems tried to discredit (I'd say humiliate) Kavanaugh.

They didn't have to try to discredit him, he discredited and humiliated himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else troubled by the fact that a PROSECUTOR is picking apart a crime victim and seemingly giving cover to an alleged perpetrator? I suppose it’s not a big deal, but it bugs me. If I were assaulted in Maricopa County next week, I’d feel especially vulnerable thinking she was the one who was supposed to get justice for me.

She was hired to stand in for the Republicans since the Dems made a big issue about the old white men stuff. So of course she's speaking for them. She's not acting as a prosecutor. Her job was to discredit Ford, just as the Dems tried to discredit (I'd say humiliate) Kavanaugh.

He humiliated himself. He knew darn well every little skeleton comes out to dance and he went forward anyway.

[Anonymous]

I think I am done following these threads. They have totally dropped my productivity and I have no need to keep reading these crazy conservative conspiracy theories

There is no hope left for you people

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else troubled by the fact that a PROSECUTOR is picking apart a crime victim and seemingly giving cover to an alleged perpetrator? I suppose it’s not a big deal, but it bugs me. If I were assaulted in Maricopa County next week, I’d feel especially vulnerable thinking she was the one who was supposed to get justice for me.

Yes, I too am confused by her taking on this role.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe women.

No matter what.

I believe the person who has the preponderance of evidence on his or her side.

Well that is Ford then. His evidence was his testimony (nuts) and his calendar (which shows he drank all the time and was at a party on july 1 with the people she said were there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe women.

No matter what.

We know. That's the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the Mitchell memo. No one is asking for charges to be brought. No one is contending that she met the reasonable doubt standard.

The report just makes me more sympathetic to Ford. She is being criticized and torn apart and now a prosecutor has torn through and prepared a report for nothing. And there is no report on Kavanaugh. And we all saw his performance and know where the inconsistencies are. Not to mention his conduct.

How bizarre.

She's not being torn apart for nothing. She makes some claims that stretch all plausibility.

After the bright lights of the hearing have faded away people are questioning substance of Ford's story as not passing the common sense test:

In the alleged assault, Ford says in her oral testimony she went upstairs to use the bathroom and her assailants came up from “behind her” and pushed her into a bedroom where “there was music playing in the bedroom”. Who turned on the music? If the assailants came in from behind her, it would not have been the assailants who turned the music on. Who leaves music playing in a bedroom that is empty?

Ford says in her testimony that there was no music or TV playing in the first floor living room where the main gathering was taking place and where everybody was drinking beer. How many teenage summer parties have you been to where there is NO music playing (esp in the 80's)?

And yet, she has NO REASON to lie. The Democrats do, but she personally has no reason to make this up and destroy her life. I don’t care how much the gofundme is.

Brian Williams had no reason to lie. Yet he did. Although if you ask him, and Ford, and K, I'd bet each of them would say they weren't lying. (Ok, Brian Williams now knows his memory is wrong, but I haven't ever heard him say he intentionally lied.) Memory is a strange thing. It's one reason eye witnesses aren't as great as we'd like to think they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else troubled by the fact that a PROSECUTOR is picking apart a crime victim and seemingly giving cover to an alleged perpetrator? I suppose it’s not a big deal, but it bugs me. If I were assaulted in Maricopa County next week, I’d feel especially vulnerable thinking she was the one who was supposed to get justice for me.

I had the same thought, and I’m shocked she even agreed to do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else troubled by the fact that a PROSECUTOR is picking apart a crime victim and seemingly giving cover to an alleged perpetrator? I suppose it’s not a big deal, but it bugs me. If I were assaulted in Maricopa County next week, I’d feel especially vulnerable thinking she was the one who was supposed to get justice for me.

I had the same thought, and I’m shocked she even agreed to do it.

It was a terrible move but she may have plans to transition in to politics and go up for election.

[Anonymous]

The SNL skit of the hearing was great about the prosecutor!
Not mocking her, but mocking the crappy position that the R. senators put her in.